This paper presents a robotic solution to assist older adults with mild cognitive impairments in navigation. The system is based on a passive robotic walker, called FriWalk, which features actuated front steering wheels. Its key contribution is a guidance mechanism designed to follow a path while maintaining the user’s freedom of movement. When the user strays from the path, the system becomes rigid to ensure safe realignment. When the user’s movements are closely aligned with the path, the walker switches to ‘vehicle compliance mode’, allowing shared control through adjustable stiffness. In this mode, the system provides minimal interference, giving the user full control when s/he is very close to the planned path. However, as the user’s deviation increases, the walker gradually stiffens to keep the user on track. The paper includes theoretical validation of this mechanism, as well as simulations and experiments that demonstrate a strong balance between safety and user comfort.
AndreettoMDivanSFontanelliD, et al. (2017a) Harnessing steering singularities in passive path following for robotic walkers. In: Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Singapore: IEEE, 2426–2432.
2.
AndreettoMDivanSFontanelliD, et al. (2017b) Path following with authority sharing between humans and passive robotic walkers equipped with low-cost actuators. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters2(4): 2271–2278. https://doi.org/10.1109/lra.2017.2724772
3.
AndreettoMDivanSFontanelliD, et al. (2017c) Assistive robotic walker parameter identification for estimation of human thrust without force sensors. In: Proc. IEEE Intl. Forum on Research and Technologies for Society and Industry (RTSI). Modena, Italy: IEEE, September 12-13, 2017, 1–6.
4.
AndreettoMDivanSFerrariF, et al. (2018) Simulating passivity for Robotic Walkers via Authority-Sharing. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters3(2): 1306–1313. https://doi.org/10.1109/lra.2018.2797321
5.
AntonucciAPapiniGRBevilacquaP, et al. (2021) Efficient prediction of human motion for real-time robotics applications with physics-inspired neural networks. IEEE Access10: 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3138614
6.
AntonucciABevilacquaPLeonardiS, et al. (2023) Humans as path-finders for Mobile robots using teach-by-showing navigation. Autonomous Robots47(8): 1255–1273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-023-10125-5
7.
BennettRVijaygopalR (2023) Adoption of new transportation assistive technologies by people with mild intellectual disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology0(0): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2023.2286522
8.
BevilacquaPFregoMFontanelliD, et al. (2018) Reactive planning for assistive robots. IEEE Robotics Autom. Lett3(2): 1276–1283. https://doi.org/10.1109/lra.2018.2795642
9.
BevilacquaPFregoMPalopoliL, et al. (2021) Activity planning for assistive robots using chance-constrained stochastic programming. IEEE Trans. Ind. Informatics17(6): 3950–3961. https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2020.3012094
10.
BoldrerMAntonucciABevilacquaP, et al. (2022) Multi-Agent navigation in human-shared environments: a safe and socially-aware approach. Robotics and Autonomous Systems149: 103979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2021.103979
11.
ChuyOYHirataYWangZ, et al. (2007) A control approach based on passive behavior to enhance user interaction. IEEE Transactions on Robotics23(5): 899–908. https://doi.org/10.1109/tro.2007.907920
12.
CortésUMartínez-VelascoABarruéC, et al. (2008) Towards an intelligent service to elders mobility using the I-Walker. In: AAAI Fall Symposium: AI in Eldercare: New Solutions to Old Problems, 32–38.
13.
DubowskySGenotFGoddingS, et al. (2000) Pamm-a robotic aid to the elderly for mobility assistance and monitoring: a “helping-hand” for the elderly. In: Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No. 00CH37065). San Francisco, USA: IEEE, April 24-28, 2000, Vol. 1, 570–576. https://doi.org/10.1109/robot.2000.844114
14.
FalquetoPAntonucciAPalopoliL, et al. (2024) Humanising robot-assisted navigation. Intelligent Service Robotics17(2): 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-023-00495-1
15.
FerrariFDivanSGuerreroC, et al. (2020) Human–robot interaction analysis for a smart walker for elderly: the acanto interactive guidance system. International Journal of Social Robotics12(2): 479–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00572-5
16.
FontanelliDShamsfakhrFMaciiD, et al. (2021) An uncertainty-driven and observability-based State estimator for nonholonomic robots. IEEE Trans. on Instrumentation and Measurement70: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2021.3053066
17.
FreibergerESieberCKobR (2020) Mobility in older community-dwelling persons: a narrative review. Frontiers in Physiology11: 881. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00881
18.
GeravandMWernerCHauerK, et al. (2016) An integrated decision making approach for adaptive shared control of mobility assistance robots. International Journal of Social Robotics8: 631–648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0353-z
19.
GoebelRSanfeliceRGTeelAR (2012) Hybrid Dynamical Systems: Modeling, Stability, and Robustness. Princeton University Press.
20.
GoswamiAPeshkinMColgateJ (1990) Passive robotics: an exploration of mechanical computation. In: Proceedings of the 1990 American Control Conference, San Diego, USA, May 23 - 25, 1990, 2791–2796.
21.
GrafBSchraftRD (2007) Behavior-based path modification for shared control of robotic walking aids. In: 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Noordwijk, Netherlands, June, 13 -15, 2007, 317–322.
22.
HirataYHaraAKosugeK (2007) Motion control of passive intelligent walker using servo brakes. IEEE Transactions on Robotics23(5): 981–990. https://doi.org/10.1109/tro.2007.906252
23.
HsiehYHYoungKYKoCH (2015) Effective maneuver for passive robot walking helper based on user intention. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics62(10): 6404–6416. https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2015.2416679
24.
JiangSYLinCYHuangKT, et al. (2017) Shared control design of a walking-assistant robot. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology25(6): 2143–2150. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcst.2016.2638879
25.
JiménezMFMonllorMFrizeraA, et al. (2019) Admittance controller with spatial modulation for assisted locomotion using a smart walker. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems94: 621–637.
26.
LaumondJP (1998) Robot motion planning and control. Lectures Notes in Control and Information Sciences229: 3.
LeonhardW (2012) Control of Electrical Drives. Springer Science & Business Media.
29.
LoseyDPMcdonaldCGBattagliaE, et al. (2018) A review of intent detection, arbitration, and communication aspects of shared control for physical human-robot interaction. Applied Mechanics Reviews70: 010804. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039145
MusichSWangSSRuizJ, et al. (2018) The impact of mobility limitations on health outcomes among older adults. Geriatric Nursing39(2): 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2017.08.002
32.
NazemzadehPMoroFFontanelliD, et al. (2015) Indoor positioning of a robotic walking assistant for large public environments. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement64(11): 2965–2976. https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2015.2437637
33.
NazemzadehPFontanelliDMaciiD, et al. (2017) Indoor localization of mobile robots through qr code detection and dead reckoning data fusion. IEEE22(6): 2588–2599. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmech.2017.2762598
34.
PalopoliLArgyrosABirchbauerJ, et al. (2015) Navigation assistance and guidance of older adults across complex public spaces: the DALi approach. Intelligent Service Robotics8(2): 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-015-0169-y
35.
PauloJPeixotoPNunesUJ (2017) Isr-aiwalker: robotic walker for intuitive and safe mobility assistance and gait analysis. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems47(6): 1110–1122. https://doi.org/10.1109/thms.2017.2759807
36.
RentschlerAJSimpsonRCooperRA, et al. (2008) Clinical evaluation of guido robotic walker. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development45(9): 1281–1293.
37.
ResnikLAllenSIsenstadtD, et al. (2009) Perspectives on use of mobility aids in a diverse population of seniors: implications for intervention. Disability and Health Journal2(2): 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2008.12.002
38.
RingwaldMThebenPGerlingerK, et al. (2023) How should your assistive robot look like? A scoping review on embodiment for assistive robots. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems107(1): 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-022-01781-3
39.
SicilianoBSciaviccoLVillaniL, et al. (2010) Robotics: Modelling, Planning and Control. Springer Science & Business Media.
40.
SierraDGarzónMMúneraM, et al. (2019) Human–robot–environment interaction interface for smart Walker assisted gait: Agora Walker. Sensors19(13): 2897.
41.
SoetantoDLapierreLPascoalA (2003) Adaptive, non-singular path-following control of dynamic wheeled robots. IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control2: 1765–1770, IEEE.
42.
TaghvaeiSHirataYKosugeK (2011) Control of a passive walker using a depth sensor for user state estimation. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, Karon Beach, Thailand, December, 7-11, 2011, 1639–1645.
43.
VasP (1998) Sensorless Vector and Direct Torque Control. Oxford Univ. Press.
44.
WolfSGrioliGEibergerO, et al. (2015) Variable stiffness actuators: review on design and components. IEEE/ASME transactions on mechatronics21(5): 2418–2430. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmech.2015.2501019
