Conjoined collaborative robots, functioning as supernumerary robotic bodies (SRBs), can enhance human load tolerance abilities. However, in tasks involving physical interaction with humans, users may still adopt awkward, non-ergonomic postures, which can lead to discomfort or injury over time. In this paper, we propose a novel control framework that provides kinesthetic feedback to SRB users when a non-ergonomic posture is detected, offering resistance to discourage such behaviors. This approach aims to foster long-term learning of ergonomic habits and promote proper posture during physical interactions. To achieve this, a virtual fixture method is developed, integrated with a continuous, online ergonomic posture assessment framework. Additionally, to improve coordination between the operator and the SRB, which consists of a robotic arm mounted on a floating base, the position of the floating base is adjusted as needed. Experimental results demonstrate the functionality and efficacy of the ergonomics-driven control framework, including two user studies involving practical loco-manipulation tasks with 14 subjects, comparing the proposed framework with a baseline control framework that does not account for human ergonomics.
BalattiPOzdamarISirintunaD, et al. (2024) Robot-assisted navigation for visually impaired through adaptive impedance and path planning. In: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp. 2310–2316.
2.
BärMSteinhilberBRiegerMA, et al. (2021) The influence of using exoskeletons during occupational tasks on acute physical stress and strain compared to no exoskeleton–a systematic review and meta-analysis. Applied Ergonomics94: 103385.
3.
BenziFMancusCSecchiC (2022) Whole-body control of a mobile manipulator for passive collaborative transportation. IFAC-PapersOnLine55(38): 106–112.
4.
BowyerSAy BaenaFR (2015) Dissipative control for physical human–robot interaction. IEEE Transactions on Robotics31(6): 1281–1293.
5.
BowyerSADaviesBLy BaenaFR (2013) Active constraints/virtual fixtures: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Robotics30(1): 138–157.
6.
Castillo-CrucesRAWahrburgJ (2010) Virtual fixtures with autonomous error compensation for human–robot cooperative tasks. Robotica28(2): 267–277.
7.
De LoozeMPBoschTKrauseF, et al. (2016) Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load. Ergonomics59(5): 671–681.
8.
DominijanniGPinheiroDLPollinaL, et al. (2023) Human motor augmentation with an extra robotic arm without functional interference. Science Robotics8(85): eadh1438.
9.
EdenJBräckleinMIbáñezJ, et al. (2022) Principles of human movement augmentation and the challenges in making it a reality. Nature Communications13(1): 1345.
10.
FerragutiFVillaRLandiCT, et al. (2020) A unified architecture for physical and ergonomic human–robot collaboration. Robotica38(4): 669–683.
11.
GiammarinoAGandariasJMBalattiP, et al. (2024) Super-man: supernumerary robotic bodies for physical assistance in human–robot conjoined actions. Mechatronics103: 103240.
12.
HartSG (2006) Nasa-task load index (Nasa-tlx); 20 years later. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting50(9): 904–908.
13.
HasanenBSutharBZweiriY, et al. (2024) Design of twisted string actuated flexure joint for supernumerary robotic arm for bi-manual tasks. IEEE Sensors Journal25: 7848–7857.
14.
HendriksSHasanenBAfzalN, et al. (2024) Enhancing functional and extra motor abilities: a focus group study on the re-design of an extra-robotic finger. In: 2024 33rd IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN). IEEE, pp. 667–673.
15.
HignettSMcAtamneyL (2000) Rapid entire body assessment (Reba). Applied Ergonomics31(2): 201–205.
16.
HuWPanXWangH (2024) Proxy-based guidance virtual fixtures with orientation constraints. International Journal of Intelligent Robotics and Applications8: 1–11.
17.
KastritsiTDoulgeriZ (2022) A passive admittance controller to enforce remote center of motion and tool spatial constraints with application in hands-on surgical procedures. Robotics and Autonomous Systems152: 104073.
18.
KastritsiTPapageorgiouDSarantopoulosI, et al. (2019) Stability of active constraints enforcement in sensitive regions defined by point-clouds for robotic surgical procedures. In: 2019 18th European Control Conference (ECC). IEEE, pp. 1604–1609.
19.
KeeminkAQVan der KooijHStienenAH (2018) Admittance control for physical human–robot interaction. The International Journal of Robotics Research37(11): 1421–1444.
20.
KermavnarTde VriesAWde LoozeMP, et al. (2021) Effects of industrial back-support exoskeletons on body loading and user experience: an updated systematic review. Ergonomics64(6): 685–711.
KimWBalattiPLamonE, et al. (2020) Moca-man: a mobile and reconfigurable collaborative robot assistant for conjoined human-robot actions. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp. 10191–10197.
23.
KoutrasLDoulgeriZ (2021) Exponential stability of trajectory tracking control in the orientation space utilizing unit quaternions. In: 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, pp. 8151–8158.
24.
LagomarsinoMLorenziniMConstableMD, et al. (2023) Maximising coefficiency of human-robot handovers through reinforcement learning. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters8(8): 4378–4385.
25.
LamyXColledaniFGeffardF, et al. (2009) Achieving efficient and stable comanipulation through adaptation to changes in human arm impedance. In: 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, pp. 265–271.
26.
LecoursAMayer-St-OngeBGosselinC (2012) Variable admittance control of a four-degree-of-freedom intelligent assist device. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, pp. 3903–3908.
27.
LeighAPineauJOlmedoN, et al. (2015) Person tracking and following with 2d laser scanners. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp. 726–733.
28.
LewisJR (2018) The system usability scale: past, present, and future. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction34(7): 577–590.
29.
LiaoZLorenziniMLeonoriM, et al. (2023) An ergo-interactive framework for human-robot collaboration via learning from demonstration. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters9: 359–366.
30.
LorenziniMKimWAjoudaniA (2022) An online multi-index approach to human ergonomics assessment in the workplace. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems52(5): 812–823.
31.
LorenziniMLagomarsinoMFortiniL, et al. (2023) Ergonomic human-robot collaboration in industry: a review. Frontiers in Robotics and AI9: 813907.
32.
McAtamneyLCorlettEN (1993) Rula: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Applied Ergonomics24(2): 91–99.
33.
MiyashitaKUrabeYKobayashiH, et al. (2008) Relationship between maximum shoulder external rotation angle during throwing and physical variables. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine7(1): 47–53.
34.
MorfinoRLaurettiCCordellaF, et al. (2024) A hybrid position/force control for robot-aided pedicle tapping in spinal surgery. In: 2024 10th IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference for Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob). IEEE, pp. 1004–1010.
35.
NakamuraYHanafusaH (1986) Inverse kinematic solutions with singularity robustness for robot manipulator control. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control108(3): 163–171.
36.
NavarroBCherubiniAFonteA, et al. (2017) A framework for intuitive collaboration with a mobile manipulator. In: 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, pp. 6293–6298.
37.
PapageorgiouDKastritsiTDoulgeriZ (2020a) A passive robot controller aiding human coaching for kinematic behavior modifications. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing61: 101824.
38.
PapageorgiouDKastritsiTDoulgeriZ, et al. (2020b) A passive phri controller for assisting the user in partially known tasks. IEEE Transactions on Robotics36(3): 802–815.
39.
PrattichizzoDPozziMBaldiTL, et al. (2021) Human augmentation by wearable supernumerary robotic limbs: review and perspectives. Progress in Biomedical Engineering3(4): 042005.
40.
ProiaSCarliRCavoneG, et al. (2021) Control techniques for safe, ergonomic, and efficient human-robot collaboration in the digital industry: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering19(3): 1798–1819.
41.
RaeiHGandariasJMDe MomiE, et al. (2024) A multipurpose interface for close-and far-proximity control of mobile collaborative robots. In: 2024 10th IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference for Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob). IEEE, pp. 457–464.
42.
RosenbergLB (1992) The use of virtual fixtures as perceptual overlays to enhance operator performance in remote environments. Air Force Material Command. 1–42.
43.
RuspiniDCKolarovKKhatibO (1997) The haptic display of complex graphical environments. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Los Angeles, CA, USA, August 3-8, 1997, 345–352.
44.
RydenFKosariSNChizeckHJ (2011) Proxy method for fast haptic rendering from time varying point clouds. In: 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, pp. 2614–2619.
45.
ShaftiAAtakaALazpitaBU, et al. (2019) Real-time robot-assisted ergonomics. In: 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp. 1975–1981.
46.
SidiropoulosAKastritsiTPapageorgiouD, et al. (2021) A variable admittance controller for human-robot manipulation of large inertia objects. In: 2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, pp. 509–514.
47.
SirintunaDKastritsiTOzdamarI, et al. (2024) Enhancing human–robot collaborative transportation through obstacle-aware vibrotactile warning and virtual fixtures. Robotics and Autonomous Systems178: 104725.
48.
StavridisSPapageorgiouDDoulgeriZ (2017) Dynamical system based robotic motion generation with obstacle avoidance. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters2(2): 712–718.
49.
TheurelJDesbrossesK (2019) Occupational exoskeletons: overview of their benefits and limitations in preventing work-related musculoskeletal disorders. IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors7(3-4): 264–280.
50.
TongYLiuJ (2021) Review of research and development of supernumerary robotic limbs. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica8(5): 929–952.
51.
YangBHuangJChenX, et al. (2021) Supernumerary robotic limbs: a review and future outlook. IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics3(3): 623–639.
52.
ZanchettinAMLotanoERoccoP (2019) Collaborative robot assistant for the ergonomic manipulation of cumbersome objects. In: 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, pp. 6729–6734.
53.
ZillesCBSalisburyJK (1995) A constraint-based god-object method for haptic display. In: Proceedings 1995 ieee/rsj International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots, (Vol. 3, pp. 146–151). IEEE.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
