This paper presents an algorithm to geometrically characterize inertial parameter identifiability for an articulated robot. The geometric approach tests identifiability across the infinite space of configurations using only a finite set of conditions and without approximation. It can be applied to general open-chain kinematic trees ranging from industrial manipulators to legged robots, and it is the first solution for this broad set of systems that is provably correct. The high-level operation of the algorithm is based on a key observation: Undetectable changes in inertial parameters can be represented as sequences of inertial transfers across the joints. Drawing on the exponential parameterization of rigid-body kinematics, undetectable inertial transfers are analyzed in terms of observability from linear systems theory. This analysis can be applied recursively, and lends an overall complexity of O(N) to characterize parameter identifiability for a system of N bodies. Matlab source code for the new algorithm is provided.
AtkesonCGAnCHHollerbachJM (1986) Estimation of inertial parameters of manipulator loads and links. The International Journal of Robotics Research5(3): 101–119.
2.
AyusawaKVentureGNakamuraY (2008) Identification of the inertial parameters of a humanoid robot using unactuated dynamics of the base link. In: IEEE RAS humanoids, Daejeon, Korea (South), 01–03 December 2008, 1–7.
3.
AyusawaKVentureGNakamuraY (2010) Identification of flying humanoids and humans. In: 2010 IEEE International conference on robotics and automation, Anchorage, AK, 03–07 May 2010, 3715–3720.
4.
AyusawaKVentureGNakamuraY (2014) Identifiability and identification of inertial parameters using the underactuated base-link dynamics for legged multibody systems. The International Journal of Robotics Research33(3): 446–468.
5.
BellmanRAströmKJ (1970) On structural identifiability. Mathematical Biosciences7: 329–339.
6.
BledtGPowellMJKatzB, et al. (2018a) Mit Cheetah 3: Design and Control of a Robust, Dynamic Quadruped Robot. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2245–2252.
7.
BledtGWensingPMIngersollS, et al. (2018b) Contact model fusion for event-based locomotion in unstructured terrains. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Brisbane, QLD, 21–25 May 2018, 4399–4406.
8.
BoffiNMSlotineJJE (2021) Implicit regularization and momentum algorithms in nonlinearly parameterized adaptive control and prediction. Neural Computation33(3): 590–673.
9.
BonnetVCrosnierAVentureG, et al. (2018) Inertial parameters identification of a humanoid robot hanged to a fix force sensor. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Brisbane, QLD, 21–25 May 2018, 4927–4932.
10.
CalafioreGIndriM (2000) Robust calibration and control of robotic manipulators. In: American control conference, Chicago, IL, 28–30 June 2000, 2003–2007.
11.
CalafioreGIndriMBonaB (2001) Robot dynamic calibration: optimal excitation trajectories and experimental parameter estimation. Journal of Robotic Systems18(2): 55–68.
12.
CarpentierJSaurelGBuondonnoG, et al. (2019) The pinocchio c++ library: a fast and flexible implementation of rigid body dynamics algorithms and their analytical derivatives. In: IEEE/SICE international symposium on system integration, Paris, 14–16 January 2019, 614–619.
13.
ChenKBealeDG (2002) A new symbolic method to determine base inertia parameters for general spatial mechanisms. International Design Engineering Technical Conferences36223: 731–735.
14.
ChenKBealeDGWangD (2002) A new method to determine the base inertial parameters of planar mechanisms. Mechanism and Machine Theory37(9): 971–984.
15.
ChungSJSlotineJJE (2009) Cooperative robot control and concurrent synchronization of Lagrangian systems. IEEE Transactions on Robotics25(3): 686–700.
16.
De LucaAAlbu-SchafferAHaddadinS, et al. (2006) Collision detection and safe reaction with the DLR-III lightweight manipulator arm. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, Beijing, 09–15 October 2006, 1623–1630.
17.
EcheandiaSWensingPM (2021) Numerical methods to compute the Coriolis matrix and Christoffel symbols for rigid-body systems. Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics16(9): 091004.
18.
FeatherstoneR (2008) Rigid Body Dynamics Algorithms. New York, NY: Springer.
19.
FeatherstoneROrinD (2008) Chapter 2: dynamics. In: SicilianoBKhatibO (eds) Springer Handbook of Robotics. New York, NY: Springer.
20.
GarofaloGWuXOttC (2021) Adaptive passivity-based multi-task tracking control for robotic manipulators. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters6(4): 7129–7136.
21.
GautierM (1991) Numerical calculation of the base inertial parameters of robots. Journal of Robotic Systems8: 485–506.
22.
GautierMKhalilW (1990) Direct calculation of minimum set of inertial parameters of serial robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation6(3): 368–373.
23.
GautierMKhalilW (1992) Exciting trajectories for the identification of base inertial parameters of robots. The International Journal of Robotics Research11(4): 362–375.
24.
GazCDe LucaA (2017) Payload Estimation Based on Identified Coefficients of Robot Dynamics—With an Application to Collision Detection. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 3033–3040.
25.
GazCFlaccoFDe LucaA (2016) Extracting feasible robot parameters from dynamic coefficients using nonlinear optimization methods. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2075–2081.
26.
HaddadinSDe LucaAAlbu-SchäfferA (2017) Robot collisions: a survey on detection, isolation, and identification. IEEE Transactions on Robotics33(6): 1292–1312.
27.
IriarteXRosJValeroF, et al. (2013) Symbolic calculation of the base inertial parameters of a low mobility mechanism. Proc. ECCOMAS Multibody Dynamics. Croatia: University of Zagreb, 1113–1124.
28.
JanotAVandanjonPOGautierM (2014a) A generic instrumental variable approach for industrial robot identification. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology22(1): 132–145.
29.
JanotAOlivier VandanjonPGautierM (2014b) An instrumental variable approach for rigid industrial robots identification. Control Engineering Practice25: 85–101.
30.
JovicJPhilippFEscandeA, et al. (2015) Identification of dynamics of humanoids: systematic exciting motion generation. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, Hamburg, 28 September 2015–02 October 2015, 2173–2179.
31.
JovicJEscandeAAyusawaK, et al. (2016) Humanoid and human inertia parameter identification using hierarchical optimization. IEEE Transactions on Robotics32(3): 726–735.
32.
KawasakiHBeniyaYKanzakiK (1991) Minimum dynamics parameters of tree structure robot models. Int. Conf. on Industrial Electronics, Control and Instrumentation2: 1100–1105.
33.
KhalilWBennisF (1995) Symbolic calculation of the base inertial parameters of closed-loop robots. The International Journal of Robotics Research14(2): 112–128.
34.
KhalilWDombreE (2002) Modeling Identification and Control of Robots. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
35.
KhalilWKleinfingerJF (1987) Minimum operations and minimum parameters of the dynamic models of tree structure robots. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation3(6): 517–526.
36.
KhalilWGautierMKleinfingerJ (1986) Automatic generation of identification models of robots. International Journal of Robotics and Automation1(1): 2–6.
37.
KhalilWVijayalingamAKhomutenkoB, et al. (2014) Opensymoro: an open-source software package for symbolic modelling of robots. 2014 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 1206–1211.
38.
KhoslaP (1986) Real-time Control and Identification of Direct-Drive Manipulators. PhD Dissertation, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
39.
KhoslaPK (1989) Categorization of parameters in the dynamic robot model. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation5(3): 261–268.
40.
LeeTParkFC (2018) A geometric algorithm for robust multibody inertial parameter identification. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters3(3): 2455–2462.
41.
LeeTKwonJParkFC (2018) A natural adaptive control law for robot manipulators. 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 1–9.
42.
LeeTWensingPMParkFC (2020) Geometric robot dynamic identification: a convex programming approach. IEEE Transactions on Robotics36(2): 348–365.
43.
LeeTLeeBDParkFC (2021) Optimal excitation trajectories for mechanical systems identification. Automatica131: 109773.
44.
LiWSlotineJJE (1989) An indirect adaptive robot controller. Systems & Control Letters12(3): 259–266.
45.
LuhJYSWalkerMWPaulRPC (1980) On-line computational scheme for mechanical manipulators. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control102(2): 69–76.
46.
MayedaHYoshidaKOsukaK (1990) Base parameters of manipulator dynamic models. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation6(3): 312–321.
NiemeyerGSlotineJJE (1991) Performance in adaptive manipulator control. The International Journal of Robotics Research10(2): 149–161.
49.
O’ConnellMShiGShiX, et al. (2022) Neural-fly enables rapid learning for agile flight in strong winds. Science Robotics7(66): eabm6597.
50.
PanYYuH (2018) Composite learning robot control with guaranteed parameter convergence. Automatica89: 398–406.
51.
PucciDRomanoFNoriF (2015) Collocated adaptive control of underactuated mechanical systems. IEEE Transactions on Robotics31(6): 1527–1536.
52.
RamdaniNPoignetP (2005) Robust dynamic experimental identification of robots with set membership uncertainty. IEEE10(2): 253–256.
53.
RosJIriarteXMataV (2012) 3d inertia transfer concept and symbolic determination of the base inertial parameters. Mechanism and Machine Theory49: 284–297.
54.
RosJPlazaAIriarteX, et al. (2015) Inertia transfer concept based general method for the determination of the base inertial parameters. Multibody System Dynamics34(4): 327–347.
55.
RughWJ (1996) Linear Systems Theory. 2nd edition. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
56.
SheuSYWalkerMW (1991) Identifying the independent inertial parameter space of robot manipulators. The International Journal of Robotics Research10(6): 668–683.
57.
SicilianoBSciaviccoLVillaniL, et al. (2008) Robotics: Modelling, Planning and Control. New York, NY: Springer.
58.
SlotineJJELiW (1987) On the adaptive control of robot manipulators. The International Journal of Robotics Research6(3): 49–59.
59.
SlotineJJELiW (1989) Composite adaptive control of robot manipulators. Automatica25(4): 509–519.
60.
SousaCDCortesãoR (2014) Physical feasibility of robot base inertial parameter identification: a linear matrix inequality approach. The International Journal of Robotics Research33(6): 931–944.
61.
SunZGeSLeeT (2002) Controllability and reachability criteria for switched linear systems. Automatica38(5): 775–786.
62.
SweversJGansemanCTukelDB, et al. (1997) Optimal robot excitation and identification. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation13(5): 730–740.
63.
TournoisGFocchiMPreteAD, et al. (2017) Online payload identi cation for quadruped robots. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, Vancouver, BC, 24–28 September 2017.
64.
TraversaroSPreteADMuradoreR, et al. (2013) Inertial parameter identification including friction and motor dynamics. In: IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots (Humanoids), Atlanta, GA, 15–17 October 2013, 68–73.
65.
WangH (2013) Recursive composite adaptation for robot manipulators. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control135(2): 021010.
66.
WangHXieY (2012) On the recursive adaptive control for free-floating space manipulators. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems66(4): 443–461.
67.
WangLOrtegaRBobtsovA, et al. (2023) Identifiability implies robust, globally exponentially convergent on-line parameter estimation. International Journal of Control1–17.
WensingPMKimSSlotineJJ (2017a) Linear matrix inequalities for phyiscally consistent inertial parameter identification: a statistical perspective on the mass distribution. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
72.
WensingPMWangASeokS, et al. (2017b) Proprioceptive actuator design in the MIT Cheetah: impact mitigation and high-bandwidth physical interaction for dynamic legged robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics33(3): 509–522.
73.
ZhuYShiTLiW, et al. (2023) Acceleration-free recursive composite learning control of high-dof robot manipulators. 2023 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. Atlanta, GA: 4739–4744.
