Highly articulated organisms serve as blueprints for incredibly dexterous mechanisms, but building similarly capable robotic counterparts has been hindered by the difficulties of developing electromechanical actuators with both the high strength and compactness of biological muscle. We develop a stackable electrostatic brake that has comparable specific tension and weight to that of muscles and integrate it into a robotic joint. High degree-of-freedom mechanisms composed of such electrostatic brake enabled joints can then employ established control algorithms to achieve hybrid motor-brake actuated dexterous manipulation. Specifically, our joint design enables a ten degree-of-freedom robot equipped with only one motor to manipulate multiple objects simultaneously. We also show that the use of brakes allows a two-fingered robot to perform in-hand re-positioning of an object 45% more quickly and with 53% lower positioning error than without brakes. Relative to fully actuated robots, robots equipped with such electrostatic brakes will have lower weight, volume, and power consumption yet retain the ability to reach arbitrary joint configurations.
AukesDMHeynemanBUlmenJ, et al. (2014) Design and testing of a selectively compliant underactuated hand. The International Journal of Robotics Research33(5): 721–735.
2.
BaizidKGiglioGPierriF, et al. (2017) Behavioral control of unmanned aerial vehicle manipulator systems. Autonomous Robots41(5): 1203–1220.
3.
BillardAKragicD (2019) Trends and challenges in robot manipulation. Science364(6446): eaat8414.
4.
DillerSMajidiCCollinsSH (2016) A lightweight, low-power electroadhesive clutch and spring for exoskeleton actuation. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Stockholm, Sweden, 6-21 May 2016. IEEE, 682–689.
5.
DissadoLMazzantiGMontanariG (1997) The role of trapped space charges in the electrical aging of insulating materials. IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation4(5): 496–506.
6.
DoBHBanashekVOkamuraAM (2020) Dynamically reconfigurable discrete distributed stiffness for inflated beam robots. In: 2020 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Paris, 31 May - 31 August 2020. IEEE, 9050–9056.
FirouzehASalernoMPaikJ (2017) Stiffness control with shape memory polymer in underactuated robotic origamis. IEEE Transactions on Robotics33(4): 765–777.
9.
GosselinCPelletierFLaliberteT (2008) An anthropomorphic underactuated robotic hand with 15 dofs and a single actuator. In: 2008 IEEE International conference on robotics and automation, Pasadena, California, 19-23 May 2008. IEEE, 749–754.
10.
GrioliGCatalanoMSilvestroE, et al. (2012) Adaptive synergies: an approach to the design of under-actuated robotic hands. In: 2012 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, Vilamoura, Algarve, 7-12, October 2012. IEEE, 1251–1256.
11.
GuoJXiangCRossiterJ (2018) A soft and shape-adaptive electroadhesive composite gripper with proprioceptive and exteroceptive capabilities. Materials & Design156: 586–587.
12.
GuoJLengJRossiterJ (2019) Electroadhesion technologies for robotics: a comprehensive review. IEEE Transactions on Robotics36(2): 313–327.
13.
HeBWangSLiuY (2019) Underactuated robotics: a review. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems16(4): 1729881419862164.
14.
HinchetRSheaH (2020) High force density textile electrostatic clutch. Advanced Materials Technologies5(4): 1900895.
15.
HinchetRVechevVSheaH, et al. (2018) Dextres: wearable haptic feedback for grasping in vr via a thin form-factor electrostatic brake. In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Berlin, Germany, 14– 17 October 2018, 901–912.
16.
JacobsenSCKoHIversenEK, et al. (1989) Antagonistic control of a tendon driven manipulator. In: 1989 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Scottsdale, AZ, 14-19 May 1989. IEEE Computer Society, 1334–1335.
17.
JiXLiuXCacuccioloV, et al. (2019) An autonomous untethered fast soft robotic insect driven by low-voltage dielectric elastomer actuators. Science Robotics4(37): eaaz6451.
18.
JohnsenARahbekK (1923) A physical phenomenon and its applications to telegraphy, telephony, etc. Journal of the Institution of Engineers: Electronics61(320): 713–725.
19.
JonesLALedermanSJ (2006) Human Hand Function. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
20.
KaragozlerMECampbellJDFedderGK, et al. (2007) Electrostatic latching for inter-module adhesion, power transfer, and communication in modular robots. In: 2007 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, San Diego, California, Oct 29-Nov 2 2007. IEEE, 2779–2786.
KoganezawaKYamazakiM (1999) Mechanical stiffness control of tendon-driven joints. In: Proceedings 1999 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems. human and environment friendly robots with high intelligence and emotional quotients (Cat. No. 99CH36289), Kyongju, Korea, 17-21 October 1999. IEEE, Volume 2, 818–825.
23.
KontoudisGPLiarokapisMVZisimatosAG, et al. (2015) Open-source, anthropomorphic, underactuated robot hands with a selectively lockable differential mechanism: towards affordable prostheses. In: 2015 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), Hamburg, Germany, 28 September 2015. IEEE, 5857–5862.
24.
LancasterPESmithJRSrinivasaSS (2019) Improved proximity, contact, and force sensing via optimization of elastomer-air interface geometry. In: 2019 international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 20-24 May 2019. IEEE, 3797–3803.
25.
LancasterPGyawaliPMavrogiannisC, et al. (2022) Optical proximity sensing for pose estimation during in-hand manipulation. In: 2022 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), Kyoto, Japan, 23–27 October 2022. IEEE, 11818–11825.
26.
MaS (1999) Analysis of snake movement forms for realization of snake-like robots. In: Proceedings 1999 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (Cat. No. 99CH36288C),Detroit, Michigan, 10-15 May 1999. IEEE, Vol. 4, 3007–3013.
27.
MaRDollarA (2017) Yale openhand project: optimizing open-source hand designs for ease of fabrication and adoption. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine24(1): 32–40.
28.
MakoviychukVWawrzyniakLGuoY, et al. (2021) Isaac Gym: High Performance Gpu-Based Physics Simulation for Robot Learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.10470.
29.
MantiMCacuccioloVCianchettiM (2016) Stiffening in soft robotics: a review of the state of the art. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine23(3): 93–106.
30.
MazzolaiBLaschiCCianchettiM, et al. (2007) Biorobotic investigation on the muscle structure of an octopus tentacle. In: 2007 29th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, Lyon, France, 20 February 2007, IEEE, 1471–1474.
31.
McMahonWBirdsallHJohnsonG, et al. (1959) Degradation studies of polyethylene terephthalate. Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data4(1): 57–79.
32.
MensJDe GeeA (1991) Friction and wear behaviour of 18 polymers in contact with steel in environments of air and water. Wear149(1-2): 255–268.
33.
MontanariG (2000) The electrical degradation threshold of polyethylene investigated by space charge and conduction current measurements. IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation7(3): 309–315.
34.
OrsagMKorpelaCBogdanS, et al. (2014) Valve turning using a dual-arm aerial manipulator. In: 2014 international conference on unmanned aircraft systems (ICUAS), Orlando, FL, 27-30 May 2014. IEEE, 836–841.
35.
PatelRCorrellN (2016) Integrated force and distance sensing using elastomer-embedded commodity proximity sensors. In: Robotics: science and systems, Cambridge, MA, 12–14 July 2016.
36.
PelrineRKornbluhRPeiQ, et al. (2000) High-speed electrically actuated elastomers with strain greater than 100. Science287(5454): 836–839.
37.
PlooijMMathijssenGCherelleP, et al. (2015) Lock your robot: a review of locking devices in robotics. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine22(1): 106–117.
38.
PolygerinosPCorrellNMorinSA, et al. (2017) Soft robotics: review of fluid-driven intrinsically soft devices; manufacturing, sensing, control, and applications in human-robot interaction. Advanced Engineering Materials19(12): 1700016.
39.
PrahladHPelrineRStanfordS, et al. (2008) Electroadhesive robots—wall climbing robots enabled by a novel, robust, and electrically controllable adhesion technology. In: 2008 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Pasadena, California, 19-23 May. 2008. IEEE, 3028–3033.
40.
RosparsJPMeyer-VernetN (2016) Force per cross-sectional area from molecules to muscles: a general property of biological motors. Royal Society Open Science3(7): 160313.
41.
SavioliLSguottiGFrancesconiA, et al. (2014) Morphing electroadhesive interface to manipulate uncooperative objects. In: Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems 2014. Bellingham, Washington: International Society for Optics and Photonics, Vol. 9061, 906129.
42.
ShintakeJRossetSSchubertB, et al. (2016) Versatile soft grippers with intrinsic electroadhesion based on multifunctional polymer actuators. Advanced Materials28(2): 231–238.
TransethAAPettersenKYLiljebäckP (2009) A survey on snake robot modeling and locomotion. Robotica27(7): 999–1015.
45.
TsaiLW (1995) Design of tendon-driven manipulators. Technical report.
46.
WilliamsGWagenerNGoldfainB, et al. (2017) Information theoretic mpc for model-based reinforcement learning. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Singapore, 29 May 2017 - 03 June 2017. IEEE, 1714–1721.
47.
XuZKumarVMatsuokaY, et al. (2012) Design of an anthropomorphic robotic finger system with biomimetic artificial joints. In: 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS international conference on biomedical robotics and biomechatronics (BioRob), Rome, Italy, 24 - 27 June 2012. IEEE, 568–574.
48.
ZhangKFollmerS (2018) Electrostatic adhesive brakes for high spatial resolution refreshable 2.5 d tactile shape displays. In: 2018 IEEE haptics symposium (HAPTICS), San Francisco, California, 25-28 March 2018. IEEE, 319–326.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
