This paper presents the application of operational space control based on hierarchical task optimization for quadrupedal locomotion. We show how the behavior of a complex robotic machine can be described by a simple set of least squares problems with different priorities for motion, torque, and force optimization. Using projected dynamics of floating base systems with multiple contact points, the optimization dimensionality can be reduced or decoupled such that the formulation is purely based on the inversion of kinematic system properties. The present controller is extensively tested in various experiments using the fully torque controllable quadrupedal robot StarlETH. The load distribution is optimized for static walking gaits to improve contact stability and/or actuator efficiency under various terrain conditions. This is augmented with simultaneous joint position and torque limitations as well as with an interpolation method to ensure smooth contact transitions. The same control structure is further used to stabilize dynamic trotting gaits under significant external disturbances such as uneven ground or pushes. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first documentation of static and dynamic locomotion with pure task-space inverse dynamics (no joint position feedback) control.
AghiliF (2005) A unified approach for inverse and direct dynamics of constrained multibody systems based on linear projection operator: Applications to control and simulation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics21(5): 834–849.
2.
BjörckAk (1996) Numerical Methods for Least Squares Problems. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
3.
BloeschMHutterMHoepflingerMH. (2012) State estimation for legged robots—Consistent fusion of leg kinematics and IMU. In: Proceedings of Robotics science and systems (RSS), Sydney, Australia, 9–13 July 2012, pp. 3–7.
4.
BuchliJKalakrishnanMMistryM. (2009) Compliant quadruped locomotion over rough terrain. In: Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), St Louis, MO, 10–15 October 2009, pp. 814–820.
5.
CorosSKarpathyAJonesB. (2011) Locomotion skills for simulated quadrupeds. ACM Transactions on Graphics30(4): 1–59.
6.
De LasaMHertzmannA (2009) Prioritized optimization for task-space control. Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), St Louis, MO, 11-15 October 2009, pp. 5755–5762
7.
DietrichAWimbockTAlbu-SchafferA. (2012) Integration of reactive, torque-based self-collision avoidance into a task hierarchy. IEEE Transactions on Robotics28(6): 1278–1293.
8.
EscandeAMansardNWieberPB (2010) Fast resolution of hierarchized inverse kinematics with inequality constraints. In: Proceedings of IEEE International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Anchorage, AK, 3–8 May 2010, pp. 3733–3738.
9.
FankhauserPHutterMGehringC. (2012) Optimizing robotic single legged locomotion with reinforcement learning. Master’s Thesis, ETH Zurich.
10.
FeatherstoneR (2004) An empirical study of the joint space inertia matrix. The International Journal of Robotics Research23(9): 859–871.
11.
GehringCCorosSHutterM. (2013) Control of dynamic gaits for a quadrupedal robot. In: Proceedings of IEEE International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Karlsruhe, Germany, 6–10 May 2013, pp. 3287–3292.
12.
Gonzales de SantosPGGarciaEEstremeraJ (2006) Stability in walking robots. In: Quadrupedal Locomotion. An Introduction to the Control of Four-legged Robots. Berlin: Springer, Vol. 1, pp. 33–54.
13.
HanafusaHYoshikawaTNakamuraY (1981) Analysis and control of articulated robot with redundancy. In: Proceedings of IFAC symposium on robot control, Vol. 14, Kyoto, Japan, pp. 78–83.
14.
HerzogARighettiLGrimmingerF. (2013) Momentum-based balance control for torque-controlled humanoids. Technical report. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.2042.
15.
HirzingerGAlbu-SchafferAHahnleM. (2001) On a new generation of torque controlled light-weight robots. In: Proceedings of IEEE International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Seoul, South Korea, 21–26 May 2001, Vol. 4. pp. 3356–3363.
16.
HutterM (2013) StarlETH & Co—Design and control of legged robots with compliant actuation. PhD Thesis, ETH Zurich.
17.
HutterMGehringCBloeschM. (2012a) StarlETH: A compliant quadrupedal robot for fast, efficient, and versatile locomotion. In: Proceedings of International conference on climbing and walking robots (CLAWAR), Baltimore, MD, 23–26 July 2012, pp. 483–490.
18.
HutterMGehringCSiegwartR (2011a) proNEu: Derivation of analytical kinematics and dynamics. Technical report, Autonomous Systems Lab, ETHZ.
19.
HutterMHoepflingerMHRemyCD. (2012b) Hybrid operational space control for compliant legged systems. In: Proceedings of Robotics science and systems (RSS), Sydney, Australia, July 2012, pp. 129–136.
20.
HutterMRemyCDHoepflingerMH. (2011b) High compliant series elastic actuation for the robotic leg ScarlETH. In: Proceedings of International conference on climbing and walking robots (CLAWAR). Paris, 6–8 September 2011, pp. 507–514.
21.
KanounOLamirauxFWieberPB (2011) Kinematic control of redundant manipulators: Generalizing the task-priority framework to inequality task. IEEE Transactions on Robotics27(4): 785–792.
22.
KhatibO (1987) A unified approach for motion and force control of robot manipulators: The operational space formulation. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation3(1): 43–53.
23.
MansardN (2012) A dedicated solver for fast operational-space inverse dynamics. In: Proceedings of IEEE International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Saint Paul, MN, 14–18 May 2012, pp. 4943–4949.
24.
MansardNKhatibOKheddarA (2009) A unified approach to integrate unilateral constraints in the stack of tasks. IEEE Transactions on Robotics25(3): 670–685.
25.
McGheeRBFkaskAAFrankA (1968) On the stability properties of quadruped creeping gaits. Mathematical Biosciences3: 331–351.
26.
MistryMBuchliJSchaalS (2010) Inverse dynamics control of floating base systems using orthogonal decomposition. In: Proceedings of International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Anchorage, AK, 3–8 May 2010, pp. 3406–3412.
27.
NakamuraYHanafusaHYoshikawaT (1987) Task-priority based redundancy control of robot manipulators. The International Journal of Robotics Research6(2): 3–15.
28.
NakanishiJCoryRMistryM. (2008) Operational space control: A theoretical and empirical comparison. The International Journal of Robotics Research27(6): 737–757.
29.
PhilippsenRSentisLKhatibO. (2011) An open source extensible software package to create whole-body compliant skills in personal mobile manipulators. In: IEEE/RSJ International conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), San Francisco, CA, 25–30 September 2011, pp. 1036–1041.
30.
RaibertMH (1986) Legged Robots that Balance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31.
RamosOEMansardNStasseO. (2012) Walking on non-planar surfaces using an inverse dynamic stack of tasks. In: Proceedings of IEEE-RAS International conference on humanoid robots, Osaka, Japan, 29 November–1 December 2012, pp.829–834.
32.
RemyCDBuffintonKWSiegwartR (2012) Comparison of cost functions for electrically driven running robots. In: Proceedings of IEEE International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Saint Paul, MN, 14–18 May 2012, pp. 2343–2350.
33.
RighettiLBuchliJMistryM. (2010) Inverse dynamics with optimal distribution of ground reaction forces for legged robots. In: Proceedings of international conference on climbing and walking robots (CLAWAR), Nagoya, Japan, pp. 580–587.
34.
RighettiLBuchliJMistryM. (2011a) Control of legged robots with optimal distribution of contact forces. In: Proceedings of IEEE-RAS International conference on humanoid robots (Humanoids 2011), Bled, Slovenia, 26–28 October 2011, pp. 318–324.
35.
RighettiLBuchliJMistryM. (2011b) Inverse dynamics control of floating-base robots with external constraints: A unified view. In: Proceedings of IEEE International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Shanghai, 9–13 May 2011, pp. 1085–1090.
36.
RighettiLBuchliJMistryM. (2013) Optimal distribution of contact forces with inverse dynamics control. International Journal of Robotics Research32(3): 280–298.
37.
RighettiLSchaalS (2012) Quadratic programming for inverse dynamics with optimal distribution of contact forces. In: Proceedings of IEEE-RAS International conference on humanoid robots (Humanoids 2011), Bled, Slovenia, 26–28 October 2011, pp. 538–543.
38.
SaabLMansardNKeithF. (2011a) Generation of dynamic motion for anthropomorphic systems under prioritized equality and inequality constraints. In: IEEE International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Shanghai, 9–13 May 2011, pp. 1091–1096.
39.
SaabLRamosOEKeithF. (2013) Dynamic Whole-body motion generation under rigid contacts and other unilateral constraints. IEEE Transactions on Robotics29(2): 346–362.
40.
SaabLRamosOEMansardN. (2011b) Generic dynamic motion generation with multiple unilateral constraints. In: IEEE/RSJ International conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), San Francisco, CA, 25–30 September 2011, pp. 4127–4133.
SamsonCBorgneMLEspiauB (1991) Robot Control: The Task Function Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
43.
SchaalS (2009) The SL simulation and real-time control software package. Technical report, USC.
44.
SchaalSSchweighoferN (2005) Computational motor control in humans and robots. Current Opinion in Neurobiology15(6): 675–682.
45.
ScholzJPSchonerG (1999) The uncontrolled manifold concept: Identifying control variables for a functional task. Experimental Brain Research126(3): 289–306.
46.
SentisL (2007) Synthesis and control of whole-body behaviors in humanoid systems. PhD Thesis, Stanford University.
47.
SentisLKhatibO (2005) Control of free-floating humanoid robots through task prioritization. In: Proceedings of IEEE International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Barcelona, Spain, 18–22 April 2005, pp. 1718–1723.
48.
SentisLKhatibO (2010) Compliant control of multicontact and center-of-mass behaviors in humanoid robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics26(3): 483–501.
49.
SentisLPetersenJPhilippsenR (2013) Implementation and stability analysis of prioritized whole-body compliant controllers on wheeled humanoid robots in uneven terrains. Journal of Autonomous Robots (Autonomous Robots)35: 301–319.
50.
SicilianoBSlotineJJE (1991) A general framework for managing multiple tasks in highly redundant robotic systems. In: Proceedings of International conference on robots in unstructured environments (ICAR), Milan, Italy, 19–22 June 1991, Vol. 2, pp. 1211–1216.
51.
WeinmannA (1991) Uncertain Models and Robust Control. Vienna; New York: Springer.
52.
ZhouDLowKHZielinskaT (2000) An efficient foot-force distribution algorithm for quadruped walking robots. Robotica18(4): 403–413.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
