This paper considers the effect of natural material compliance on the stiffness and stability of frictional multi-contact grasps and fixtures. The contact preload profile is a key parameter in the nonlinear compliance laws governing such contacts. The paper introduces the Hertz–Walton contact compliance model which is valid for linear contact loading profiles. The model is specified in a lumped parameter form suitable for on-line grasping applications, and is entirely determined by the contact friction and by the material and geometric properties of the contacting bodies. The model predicts an asymmetric stiffening of the tangential reaction force as the normal load at the contact increases. As a result, the composite stiffness matrix of multi-contact grasps governed by natural compliance effects is asymmetric, indicating that these contact arrangements are not governed by any potential energy function. Based on the compliant grasp dynamics, the paper derives rules indicating which contact point locations and what preload profiles guarantee grasp and fixture stability. The paper also describes preliminary experiments supporting the contact model predictions.
BicchiA (2000) Hands for dexterous manipulation and robust grasping: A difficult road toward simplicity. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation16: 652–662.
2.
CampbellP (1994) Basic Fixture Design. New York: Industrial Press.
3.
ChoiHKocM (2006) Design and feasibility tests of a flexible gripper based on inflatable rubber pockets. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture46: 1350–1361.
4.
ChouYCChandruVBarashMM (1989) A mathematical approach to automatic configuration of machining fixtures: Analysis and synthesis. ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry111: 299–306.
5.
ChuaPYIlschnerTCaldwellDG (2003) Robotic manipulation of food products—a review. Industrial Robot: An International Journal30: 345–354.
6.
CutkoskyMRKaoI (1989) Computing and controlling the compliance of a robotic hand. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation5(2): 151–165.
7.
ElataDBerrymanJG (1996) Contact force-displacement laws and the mechanical behavior of random packs of identical spheres. Mechanics of Materials24: 229–240.
8.
FangBDeVorREKapoorSG (2001) An elastodynamic model of frictional contact and its influence on the dynamics of a worpiece-fixture system. ASME Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering123: 481–489.
9.
FloresPMachadoMSilvaMTMartinsJM (2011) On the continuous contact force models for soft materials in multibody dynamics. Multibody System Dynamics25: 357–375.
10.
FunahashiYYamadaTTateMSuzukiY (1996) Grasp stability analysis considering the curvatures at contact points. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 3040–3046.
11.
HallingJ (1975) Principals of Tribology. London: Macmillan.
12.
HaradaKKanekoM (2002) A sufficient condition for manipulation of enveloping family. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation18: 597–607.
HertzH (1896) On the contact of elastic solids. In: Miscellaneous Papers by H. Hertz (1882). London: Macmillan.
15.
HirschMWSmaleS (1974) Differential Equations, Dynamical Systems, and Linear Algebra. New York: Academic Press.
16.
HockenbergerMJMeterECD (1995) Effect of machining fixture design parameters on workpiece displacement. Manufacturing Review8: 22–32.
17.
HoffmanEG (1991) Jig and Fixture Design. Albany, NY: Delmar Publishers.
18.
HowardWSKumarV (1996) On the stability of grasped objects. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation12: 904–917.
19.
InoueTHiraiS (2006) Elastic model of deformable fingertip for soft-fingered manipulation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics22: 1273–1279.
20.
JohnsonKL (1985) Contact Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
LankaraniHMNikraveshPE (1994) Continuous contact force models for impact analysis in multibody systems. Nonlinear Dynamics5: 193–207.
22.
LiBMelkoteSN (1999) An elastic contact model for the prediction of workpiece-fixture contact forces in clamping. ASME Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering121: 485–493.
23.
LinQBurdickJWRimonE (2004) Computation and analysis of natural compliance in grasping and fixturing arrangements. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation20: 651–667.
24.
LinQBurdickJWRimonE (2006) Constructing minimum deflection fixture arrangements using frame invariant norms. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering3: 272–286.
25.
MindlinRD (1949) Compliance of elastic bodies in contact. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 16: 259–268.
26.
MindlinRDDeresiewiczH (1953) Elastic spheres in contact under varying oblique forces. ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics20: 327–344.
27.
MontanaDJ (1988) The kinematics of contact with compliance. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 770–774.
28.
MontanaDJ (1992) Contact stability for two-fingered grasps. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation8: 421–230.
29.
NguyenVD (1988) Constructing force-closure grasps. The International Journal of Robotics Research7: 3–16.
30.
OmataTNagataK (2000) Rigid body analysis of the indeterminate grasp force in power grasps. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation16: 46–54.
31.
PetterssonADavisSGrayJODoddTJOhlssonT (2010) Design of a magnetorheological robot gripper for handling of delicate food products with varying shapes. Journal of Food Engineering98: 332–338. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.11.020.
32.
RimonEBurdickJWOmataT (2006) A polyhedral bound on the indeterminate contact forces in fixturing and grasping arrangements. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation22: 240–255.
33.
RimonEShovalSShapiroA (2001) Design of a spider robot for motion with quasistatic force constraints. Autonomous Robots10: 279–296.
34.
ShapiroA (2005) Stability of second-order asymmetric linear systems with application to robot grasping. ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics72: 966–968.
35.
ShapiroAGreenfieldAChosetH (2007) Frictional compliance model development and experiments for snake robot climbing. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 574–579.
36.
ShapiroARimonEOhev-ZionA (2012) On the Mechanics of Natural Compliance in Frictional Contacts and its Effect on Grasp Stiffness and Stability. Technical report, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ben Gurion University, robotics.bgu.ac.il.
37.
SinhaPRAbelJM (1992) A contact stress model for multifinger grasps of rough objects. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation8: 7–22.
38.
SmithRH (2008) Analyzing Friction in the Design of Rubber Products and Their Paired Surfaces. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
39.
TianJJiaYB (2009) Modeling deformable shell-like objects grasped by a robot hand. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1297–1302.
40.
TsaiCDKaoI (2009) The latency model for viscoelastic contact interface in robotics: Theory and experiments. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1291–1296.
41.
TsaiCDKaoISakamotoNHigashimoriMKanekoM (2008) Applying viscoelastic contact modeling to grasping task: an experimental case study. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 3737–3743.
42.
TsaiCDKaoIShibataAYoshimotoKHigashimoriMKanekoM (2010) Experimental study of creep response of viscoelastic contact interface under force control. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 4275–4280.
43.
van HentenEJHemmingJvan TuijlBAJ. (2002) An autonomous robot for harvesting cucumbers in greenhouses. Autonomous Robots13: 241–258.
44.
WaltonK (1978) The oblique compression of two elastic spheres. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids26: 139–150.
45.
WaltonK (1987) The effective elastic moduli of a random packing of spheres. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids35: 213–226.
46.
WangYTKumarV (1994) Simulation of mechanical systems with multiple frictional contacts. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design116: 571–579.
47.
XiongCHLiYFDingHXiongYL (1999) On the dynamic stability of grasping. The International Journal of Robotics Research18: 951–958.
48.
XiongCHWangMYTangYXiongYL (2005) Compliant grasping with passive forces. Journal of Robotics Systems22: 271–285.
49.
XydasNBhagavatMKaoI (2000) Study of soft-finger contact mechanics using finite elements analysis and experiments. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2179–2184.
50.
XydasNKaoI (1999) Modeling of contact mechanics and friction-limit-surfaces for soft fingers in robotics, with experimental results. The International Journal of Robotics Research18: 941–950.
