Braided pneumatic artificial muscles, and in particular the better known type with a double helical braid usually called the McKibben muscle, seem to be at present the best means for motorizing robot-arms with artificial muscles. Their ability to develop high maximum force associated with lightness and a compact cylindrical shape, as well as their analogical behavior with natural skeletal muscle were very well emphasized in the 1980s by the development of the Bridgestone “soft robot” actuated by “rubbertuators”. Recent publications have presented ways for modeling McKibben artificial muscle as well as controlling its highly non-linear dynamic behavior. However, fewer studies have concentrated on analyzing the integration of artificial muscles with robot-arm architectures since the first Bridgestone prototypes were designed. In this paper we present the design of a 7R anthropomorphic robot-arm entirely actuated by antagonistic McKibben artificial muscle pairs. The validation of the robot-arm architecture was performed in a teleoperation mode.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bar-Cohen, Y. 2002. Electroactive polymers as artificial muscles: a review . Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets39(6): 822-827 .
2.
Bizzi, E., Hogan, N., Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A., and Giszter, S. F. 1992. Does the nervous system use equilibrium-point control to guide single and multiple joint movements? Behavorial and Brain Sciences15(4): 603-613 .
3.
Boff, K. R. and Lincoln, J. E. 1988. Engineering Data Compendium: Human Perception and Performance, Harry G. Armstrong Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson A. F. B., OH .
4.
Boitier, V. 1996. Design and control of a two DoF SCARA-type robot actuated with McKibben pneumatic artificial muscles. Ph.D. Thesis, INSA de Toulouse, France.
5.
Bouisset, S. 1987. The tension-length and force-velocity relationships of human muscle in situ. BioMechanics of Engineering Modelling, Simulation, Control, A. Morecki, editor, Springer-Verlag, Berlin , pp. 133-155.
6.
Bridgestone Corporation. 1987. Soft Arm ACFAS Robot System. Tokyo, Japan .
7.
Bridgestone Corporation and Taicubo Engineering. 1993. Soft Boy: Advanced Painting System Unit. Tokyo, Japan .
8.
Cai, D. and Yamaura, H. 1997. A VSS control method for a manipulator driven by an artificial muscle actuator . Electronics and Communications in Japan, Part 380(3): 55-63 .
9.
Caldwell, D. G., Medrano-Cerda, G. A., and Goodwin, M. 1995. Control of pneumatic muscle actuators . IEEE Control Systems Magazine15(1): 40-48 .
10.
Caldwell, D. G., Medrano-Cerda, G. A., and Bowler, C. J. 1997. Investigation of bipedal robot locomotion using pneumatic muscle actuators . Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Albuquerque, NM, pp. 799-804 .
11.
Caldwell, D. G., Tsagarakis, N., Artrit, P., and Medrano-Cerda, G. A. 1999. Bio-mimetic principles in actuator design for a humanoid robot . European Journal of Mechanical and Environmental Engineering44(2): 75-80 .
12.
Chou, C-P. and Hannaford, B. 1996. Measurement and modeling of McKibben pneumatic artificial muscles . IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation12(1): 90-102 .
13.
Davis, S., Tsagarakis, N., Canderle, J., and Caldwell, D. G. 2003. Enhanced modeling and performance in braided pneumatic muscle actuators . International Journal of Robotics Research22(3-4): 213-227 .
14.
E.P.W. 1984. Rubber muscles take robotics one step further . Rubber Development37(4): 117-119 .
15.
Ghez, C. 1991. Muscles: effectors of the motor system. Principles of Neural Science, E. R. Kandel, J. H. Schwartz, and T. M. Jessekk, editors, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ , pp. 548-563.
16.
Hajian, A. Z., Sanchez, D. S., and Howe, R. D. 1997. Drum roll: increasing bandwidth through passive impedance modulation . Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Albuquerque, NM, pp. 2294-2299 .
17.
Hannaford, B., Winters, J. M, Chou, C. P., and Marbot, P. 1995. The anthroform biorobotic arm: a system for the study of spinal circuits . Annals of Biomedical Engineering23: 399-408 .
18.
Hebert, M., Kant, R., and De Gennes, P.-G. 1997. Dynamics and thermodynamics of artificial muscles based on nematic gels . Journal de Physique7(7): 909-919 .
19.
Hesselroth, T., Sarkar, K., Van der Smagt, P., and Schulten, K. 1994. Neural network control of a pneumatic robot arm . IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics24(1): 28-37 .
20.
Hirai, K., Hirose, M., Haikawa, Y., and Takenaka, T. 1998. The development of Honda humanoid robot . Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Leuwen, Belgium, pp. 1321-1326 .
21.
Hollerbach, J.M. 1985. Optimumkinematicdesignforaseven degrees of freedom manipulator . Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Robotics Research, H. Hanafusa and H. Inoue, editors, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 215-222 .
22.
Inoue, K. 1988. Rubbertuators and applications for robots . Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Robotics Research, Cambridge, MA, pp. 57-63 .
23.
Kaneko, D., Jian Ping Gong, Y., and Osada, Y. 2002. Polymer gels as soft and wet chemomechanical systems—an approach to artificial muscles . Journal of Material Chemistry12(8): 2169-2177 .
24.
Kapandji, I. A. 1982. Physiology of the Joints, Volume 1, Upper Limb, 5th edition, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh .
25.
Kawamura, K., Peters, R. A. II, Baghi, S., Iskarous, M., and Bishay, M. 1995. Intelligent robotic systems in service of the disabled . IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering1(3): 14-21 .
26.
Klute, G. K., Czerniecki, J. M., and Hannaford, B. 1999. McKibben artificial muscles: pneumatic actuators with biomechanical intelligence actuator . Proceedings of the IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM’99), Atlanta, GA, pp. 19-22 .
27.
Klute, G. K., Czerniecki, J. M., and Hannaford, B. 2002. Artificial muscles: actuators for biorobotic systems . International Journal of Robotics Research21(4): 295-309 .
28.
Kreutz-Delgado, K., Long, M., and Seraji, H. 1992. Kinematic analysis of 7-DOF manipulators . International Journal of Robotics Research11(5): 469-481 .
29.
Matsushita, M. 1968. Synthesis of rubber artificial muscle . Journal of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers7(12): 110-116 (in Japanese).
30.
Martin, J. E. and Anderson, R. A. 1999. Electrostriction in field-structured composites: basis for a fast artificial muscle . Journal of Chemical Physics111(9): 4273-4281 .
31.
Noritsugu, T., Tanaka, T., and Yamanaha, T. 1996. Application of rubber artificial muscle manipulator as a rehabilitation robot . Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication, Tsukuba, Japan, pp. 112-117 .
32.
Pack, R. T., Christopher, J. L. Jr., and Kawamura, K. 1997. A rubbertuator-based structure-climbing inspection robot . Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Albuquerque, NM, pp. 1869-1874 .
33.
Rosheim, M. E. 1994. Robot Evolution. The Development of Anthrobotics. Wiley, New York .
34.
Schulte, H. F. 1961. The characteristics of the McKibben artificial muscle. The Application of External Power in Prosthetics and Orthotics, Appendix H, Publication 874, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC , pp. 94-115.
35.
Seraji, H., Long, M., and Lee, T. S. 1993. Motion control of 7-DOF arms: the configuration control approach . IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation9(2): 125-139 .
36.
Tondu, B. and Lopez, P. 1995. Theory of an artificial pneumatic muscle and application to the modelling of McKibben artificial muscle. C.R.A.S. French National Academy of Sciences, Series IIb, 320, pp. 105-114 (in French with an abridged English version).
37.
Tondu, B. and Lopez, P. 2000. Modeling and control of McKibben artificial muscle robot actuators . IEEE Control Systems Magazine20(2): 15-38 .
38.
Tuijhof, G. J. M. and Herder, J. L. 2000. Design, actuation and control of an anthropomorphic robot arm . Mechanism and Machine Theory35: 945-962 .
39.
Tsagarakis, N. G. and Caldwell, D. G. 2003. Development and control of a “soft-actuated” exoskeleton for use in physiotherapy and training . Autonomous Robots15(1): 21-33 (special issue on rehabilitation robotics).
40.
Van der Smagt, P., Groen, F., and Schulten, K. 1996. Analysis and control of a rubbertuator arm . Biological Cybernetics75: 433-440 .
41.
Winter, D. A. 1969. Anthropometry (Chapter 3) and Anthropometry, Kinematic and Force Plate Data (Appendix A). Biomechanics of Human Movement. Wiley, New York .
