Dynamics simulation plays a key role in the design, verification, and operation planning of space manipulator systems because of the difficulties of ground-based physical tests with large, flexible robotic systems. Modeling of contact dynamics has increasingly become an essential step in dynamics simulation of space station robotic operations (such as the assembly and maintenance of the station). This role requires the modeling tool to have very high fidelity. This paper describes a research project aimed at experimentally validating a general contact dynamics simulation software developed by McDonald Dettwiler Space and Advanced Robotics Ltd (previously Spar Aerospace Ltd). The experimental tests were carried out in the robotics laboratory at the University of Victoria. The validation results demonstrated that the software is capable of predicting realistic contact behavior.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aghili, F., Dupuis, E., Piedboeuf, J.-C., and de Carufel, J. 1999. Hardware-in-the-loop simulation of robots performing contact tasks . Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space, the Netherlands, pp. 583–588 .
2.
Ananthakrishnan, S., Teders, R., and Alder, K. 1996. Role of estimation in real-time contact dynamics enhancement of Space Station engineering facility . IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine3: 20–28 .
3.
Anitescu, M., Cremer, J. F., and Potra, F. A. 1996. Formulating three-dimensional contact dynamics problems . Mechanics of Structures and Machines24: 405–437 .
4.
Bridges, N. M., and Dawson, D. M. 1993. Redesign of robust controller for RLFJ robotic manipulators actuated with harmonic drives . Proceedings of the American Control Conference, San Francisco, pp. 2507–2510 .
5.
Goyal, S., Pinson, E. N., and Sinden, F. W. 1994a. Simulation of dynamics of interacting rigid bodies including friction. I: General problem and contact model . Engineering with Computers10: 162–174 .
6.
Goyal, S., Pinson, E. N., and Sinden, F. W. 1994b. Simulation of dynamics of interacting rigid bodies including friction. II: Software system design and implementation . Engineering with Computers10: 175–195 .
7.
Han, I., and Gilmore, B. J. 1993. Multi-body impact motion with friction—Analysis, simulation and experimental validation . Journal of Mechanical Design115: 412–422 .
8.
Han, I., Gilmore, B. J., and Ogot, M. M. 1992. Synthesis and experimental validation of dynamics parts-orienting devices . ASME 18th Design Automation Conference: Advances in Design Automation1: 83–93 .
9.
Hariharesan, S., and Barhorst, A. A. 1999. Modelling, simulation and experimental verification of contact/impact dynamics in flexible multi-body systems . Journal of Sound and Vibration221: 709–732 .
10.
Johnson, K. L. 1985. Contact Mechanics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
11.
Khulief, Y. A., and Shabana, A. A. 1986. Dynamics of multi-body systems with variable kinematic structure . ASME Journal of Mechanisms, Transmission and Automation in Design108: 167–175 .
12.
Lankarani, H. M., and Nikravesh, P. E. 1994. Continuous contact force models for impact analysis in multibody systems . Nonlinear Dynamics5: 193–207 .
13.
Ma, D., and Lankarani, H. M. 1997. Multibody/finite element analysis approach for modelling of crash dynamics responses . Journal of Mechanical Design119: 382–387 .
Ma, O., Buhariwala, K., Roger, N., MacLean, J., and Carr, R. 1997. MDSF—A generic development and simulation facility for flexible, complex robotic systems . Robotica15: 49–62 .
16.
Nahon, M., Damaren, C., Goncalves, J., and Bergen, A. 1995. Test facility for multi-armed space-based manipulators . Canadian Aeronautics and Space Journal41(4): 150–162 .
17.
Potkonjak, V., Vukobratovic, M. K., and Matijevic, V. 1999. Dynamics of contact tasks in robotics. Part II: Case study in dynamics of contact motion . Mechanism and Machine Theory34: 943–972 .
18.
Smith, J. A., Rizer, A. L., and Obergefell, L. E. 1993. Predictive simulation of restrained occupant dynamics in vehicle rollovers . SAE Special Publications975: 5–13 .
19.
Van Vliet, J., and Sharf, I. 1998. Development of a planar macro-micro manipulator facility: From design through model validation . Canadian Aeronautics and Space Journal44: 40–50 .
20.
Van Vliet, J., and Sharf, I. 1999. Experimental investigations of contact tasks for space-based manipulators: Further validation of MDSF contact dynamics capabilities. Final report to McDonald Dettwiler Space and Advanced Robotics Ltd and the Canadian Space Agency.
21.
Vukobratovic, M. K., and Potkonjak, V. 1999. Dynamics of contact tasks in robotics. Part I: General model of robot interacting with environment . Mechanism and Machine Theory34: 923–942 .
22.
Wee, L.-B., and Walker, M. W. 1993. On the dynamics of contact between space robots and configuration control for impact minimization . IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation9: 581–591 .
23.
Whitney, D. E. 1982. Quasi-static assembly of compliantly supported rigid parts . Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control104: 65–77 .
24.
Yang, J. K., and Lovsund, P. 1997. Development and validation of a human-body mathematical model for simulation of car-pedestrian collisions. Doktorsavh Chalmers Tek Hogsk, No. 1320.
