Unbound Dialogue: Exploring the Perception of AI-Mediated Art

Abstract

Despite its ubiquity within research and society, the study of AI-mediated art and its perception remain superficial and lacks depth. This study offers valuable perspectives for the fields of psychology and art history regarding the perception of AI-mediated art. It establishes a foundation for future investigations into the implications of art mediated by artificial intelligence, featuring nine artworks by contemporary artists: Alexandra Crouwers, Canek Zapata, Daan Couzijn, Estelle Flores, Mathias Mu, Marnix van Soom and Rodell Warner. The artworks utilize AI in diverse ways, employing different media, including paintings, sculpture, screens and projections. As the works were curated by an art historian and displayed in a gallery setting, this study provides a distinctive contribution. In contrast to the numerous existent studies that compare AI-generated images with reproductions of analog paintings in online settings, this study examines authentic works created by early and mid-career artists.

The study comprised a total of 39 participants. 26 of these were able to visit the exhibition on their own, without context or time constraints. They then took part in an in-depth interview and completed a questionnaire, aimed at gaining insights into how participants perceive the use of AI in art. The remaining 13 participants were able to visit the exhibition with context and only completed the questionnaire. We focused on how they experienced such a multimedia exhibition and what it meant to them that the artworks were mediated by AI. Additionally, we examined the role of different kinds of screens, and the presence of new digital technologies in art.

The results show a marked discrepancy between the critical openness to understanding the role of AI and other digital technologies in art, and their appreciation of the specific artworks in the context of this exhibition. The predominant explanation for this discrepancy is probably the lack of a framework for viewing this type of art.

Keywords

AI-mediated art art perception art and technology empirical aesthetics AI art perception

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bara

Ramsey

Cross

E. S.

(2025). AI Contextual information shapes moral and aesthetic judgments of AI-generated visual art. Cognition, 257, 106063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106063

Bellaiche

Shahi

Turpin

M. H.

Ragnhildstveit

Sprockett

Barr

Christensen

Seli

(2023). Humans versus AI: Whether and why we prefer human-created compared to AI-created artwork. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 8(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-023-00499-6

Bianchi

Branchini

Uricchio

Bongelli

(2025). Creativity and aesthetic evaluation of AI-generated artworks: Bridging problems and methods from psychology to AI. Frontiers in Psychology, 16(September), 1648480. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1648480

Cajulis

R. C. J.

Tuazon

J. A.

Cabauatan

R. R.

(2025). Artificial intelligence in digital art: A comparative analysis on impacts to artists. International Journal of Arts, Recreation and Sports, 4(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.47941/ijars.2444

Chamberlain

Mullin

Scheerlinck

Wagemans

(2018). Putting the art in artificial: Aesthetic responses to computer-generated art. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000136

Chiarella

S. G.

Torromino

Gagliardi

D. M.

Rossi

Babiloni

Cartocci

(2022). Investigating the negative bias towards artificial intelligence: Effects of prior assignment of AI-authorship on the aesthetic appreciation of abstract paintings. Computers in Human Behavior, 137, 107406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107406

Cunningham

(2025). An eye for AI: quantitative insights into viewer ability to identify AI-generated artworks. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 24, 124–144. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-05-2025-0105

Darda

K. M.

Cross

E. S.

(2023). The computer, A choreographer? Aesthetic responses to randomly-generated dance choreography by a computer. Heliyon, 9(1), e12750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12750

Darewych

(2023). The impact of authorship on aesthetic appreciation: A study comparing human and AI-generated artworks. Art and Society, 2(1), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.56397/AS.2023.02.11

10.

Di Dio

Ardizzi

Schieppati

S. V.

Massaro

Gilli

Gallese

Marchetti

(2025). Art made by artificial intelligence: The effect of authorship on aesthetic judgments. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 19(5), 1164–1176. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000602

11.

Fernández-Castrillo

(2023). The AI work of art in the age of its co-creation. Magazén, 4(2), 357–383. https://doi.org/10.30687/mag/2724-3923/2023/01/008

12.

Horton Jr

C. B.

White

M. W.

Iyengar

S. S.

(2023). Bias against AI art can enhance perceptions of human creativity. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 19001. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45202-3

13.

Hupbach

Janger

(2025). The impact of Pseudo-profound bullshit titles on memory for artist-created and AI-generated art. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 44(1), 02762374251314402. https://doi.org/10.1177/02762374251314402

14.

Khan

M. A.

Mikalonytė

E. S.

Mann

S. P.

Liu

Chu

Attie-Picker

Buyukbabani

M. B.

Savulescu

Hannikainen

I. R.

Earp

B. D.

(2026). Personalizing AI art boosts credit, not beauty. Technology in Society, 84, 103055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103055

15.

Liu

Chu

Zhao

Zhai

(2025). Machine creativity: Aversion, appreciation, or indifference?. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000739

16.

Messingschlager

T. V.

Appel

(2025). Mind ascribed to AI and the appreciation of AI-generated art. New Media & Society, 27(3), 1673–1692. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231200248

17.

Morewedge

C. K.

(2022). Preference for human, not algorithm aversion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26(10), 824–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.07.007

18.

Neef

N. E.

Zabel

Papoli

Otto

(2024). Drawing the full picture on diverging findings: Adjusting the view on the perception of art created by artificial intelligence. AI & SOCIETY, 40, 2859–2879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-02020-z

19.

Ragot

Martin

Cojean

(2020). AI-generated vs. Human artworks. A perception bias towards artificial intelligence? Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–10). https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382892

20.

R Core Team. (2023). R: A Language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.3.1) [Computer Software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/

21.

Rozental

Van Dartel

De Rooij

(2024). How artists use AI as a responsive material for art creation. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gjdnw

22.

Rueda-Arango

Y. D.

Rojas-Velazquez

Gorelova

A. V.

Lopez-Rincon

(2024). Exploring human perception of AI-generated artworks. 2024 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS) (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS61960.2024.10732054

23.

Samo

Highhouse

(2023). Artificial intelligence and art: Identifying the aesthetic judgment factors that distinguish human- and machine-generated artwork. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 19(5), 1084–1098. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000570

24.

Spiers

Smith

J. A.

(2019). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036813346

25.

Srinath

D. D.

(2025). Is the message of art bigger than the tools of the artist? Proceedings of the Conference on Animation and Interactive Art (pp. 74–88). https://doi.org/10.1145/3749893.3749899

26.

Starr

R. A.

Smith

J. A.

(2023). Making sense of an artwork: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of participants’ accounts of viewing a well-known painting. Qualitative Psychology, 10(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000231

27.

Van Hees

Grootswagers

Quek

G. L.

Varlet

(2025). Human perception of art in the age of artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1497469. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1497469

28.

White

M. W.

de Leon

R. P.

(2026). Less “awe”-some art: How AI diminishes the empathic power of the arts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 122, 104840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104840

29.

Hsu

Wang

(2025). Examining artificial intelligence anxiety in the context of anthropocentrism and the art turing test. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/02762374251353671

30.

Zhang

(2024). “Confrontation or Acceptance”: Understanding Novice Visual Artists’ Perception towards AI-assisted Art Creation (arXiv:2410.14925). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.14925

31.

Zhang

Gosline

(2023). Human favoritism, not AI aversion: People’s perceptions (and bias) toward generative AI, human experts, and human–GAI collaboration in persuasive content generation. Judgment and Decision Making, 18, e41. https://doi.org/10.1017/jdm.2023.37

32.

Zhou

Kawabata

(2023). Eyes can tell: Assessment of implicit attitudes toward AI art. I-Perception, 14(5), 20416695231209846. https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695231209846