Research on how affective priming influences art appreciation remains limited and contradictory. This study examined how unpleasant versus neutral primes affect beauty ratings and eye-movement patterns across abstract, landscape, and portrait paintings, comparing conscious (1000 ms) and preconscious (50 ms) prime presentations. Fifty-two participants rated 120 AI-generated paintings at baseline, then re-evaluated them two weeks later following affective primes while eye movements were recorded. Results revealed that painting category independently influenced rating changes, with abstract paintings showing larger decreases than landscapes and portraits. Critically, unpleasant primes reduced beauty ratings only under conscious presentation (p = .006), with no effect during preconscious viewing. Eye-tracking data (N = 48) showed the conscious group displayed less exploratory viewing behavior—fewer fixations, saccades, and shorter scan-paths—regardless of prime valence. Painting type also modulated scan-path length. These findings demonstrate that conscious awareness is necessary for negative affect to bias aesthetic judgments, while awareness level independently constrains visual exploration patterns.
AldhafeeriF. M.MackenzieI.KayT.AlghamdiJ.SlumingV. (2012). Regional brain responses to pleasant and unpleasant IAPS pictures: Different networks. Neuroscience Letters, 512(2), 94–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2012.01.064
2.
AndersonA. K.ChristoffK.StappenI.PanitzD.GhahremaniD. G.GloverG.SobelN. (2003). Dissociated neural representations of intensity and valence in human olfaction. Nature Neuroscience, 6(2), 196–202. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1001
BeckA. T.EpsteinN.BrownG.SteerR. A. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(6), 893–897. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.56.6.893
6.
BeckA. T.SteerR. A.BrownG. K. (1996). Beck Depression Inventory (2nd ed.). The Psychological Corporation.
7.
BerlyneD. E. (1974). The new experimental aesthetics. In BerlyneD. E. (Ed.), Studies in the new experimental aesthetics (pp. 1–25). Hemisphere.
8.
BlanchetteI.RichardsA. (2010). The influence of affect on higher level cognition: A review of research on interpretation, judgement, decision making and reasoning. Cognition & Emotion, 24(4), 561–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930903132496
9.
BurkeE. (1823). A philosophical inquiry into the origin of our ideas of the sublime and beautiful (2nd ed.). Thomas Tegg. London, UK (Original work published 1757).
10.
Cela-CondeC. J.García-PrietoJ.RamascoJ. J.MirassoC. R.BajoR.MunarE.MaestúF. (2013). Dynamics of brain networks in the aesthetic appreciation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(supplement_2), 10454–10461. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1302855110
DuttonD. (2009). The art instinct: Beauty, pleasure, & human evolution. Oxford University Press.
15.
EpsteinR.KanwisherN. (1998). A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature, 392(6676), 598–601. https://doi.org/10.1038/33402
16.
EraV.CandidiM.AgliotiS. M. (2015). Subliminal presentation of emotionally negative vs positive primes increases the perceived beauty of target stimuli. Experimental Brain Research, 233(11), 3271–3281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4395-5
EskineK. J.KacinikN. A.PrinzJ. J. (2012). Stirring images: Fear, not happiness or arousal, makes art more sublime. Emotion, 12(5), 1071–1074. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027200
19.
FlexasA.RossellóJ.ChristensenJ. F.NadalM.Olivera La RosaA.MunarE. (2013). Affective priming using facial expressions modulates liking for abstract art. PLoS ONE, 8(11), e80154. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080154
FrascaroliJ.LederH.BratticoE.Van de CruysS. (2024). Aesthetics and predictive processing: Grounds and prospects of a fruitful encounter. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 379(1895), 20220410. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0410
22.
FreedbergD.GalleseV. (2007). Motion, emotion and empathy in esthetic experience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(5), 197–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.02.003
23.
Fusar-PoliP.PlacentinoA.CarlettiF.LandiP.AllenP.SurguladzeS.PolitiP. (2009). Functional atlas of emotional faces processing: A voxel-based meta-analysis of 105 functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, 34(6), 418–432. https://doi.org/10.1139/jpn.0953
24.
GergerG.PelowskiM.IshizuT. (2019). Does priming negative emotions really contribute to more positive aesthetic judgments? A comparative study of emotion priming paradigms using emotional faces versus emotional scenes and multiple negative emotions with fEMG. Emotion, 19(8), 1396–1413. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000528
25.
GreifenederR.BlessH.PhamM. T. (2011). When do people rely on affective and cognitive feelings in judgment? A review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), 107–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310367640
26.
HamannS.HermanR. A.NolanC. L.WallenK. (2004). Men and women differ in amygdala response to visual sexual stimuli. Nature Neuroscience, 7(4), 411–416. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1208
27.
HendersonJ. M.HayesT. R. (2018). Meaning guides attention in real-world scene images: Evidence from eye movements and meaning maps. Journal of Vision, 18(6), 10. https://doi.org/10.1167/18.6.10
28.
HisliN. (1989). Beck depresyon envanterinin universite ogrencileri icin gecerliligi, guvenilirligi [A reliability and validity study of beck depression inventory in a university student sample]. Journal of Psychology, 7(23), 3–13.
29.
HolmqvistK.NyströmM.AnderssonR.DewhurstR.JarodzkaH.Van de WeijerJ. (2011). Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. Oxford University Press.
30.
HorgaG.MaiaT. V. (2012). Conscious and unconscious processes in cognitive control: A theoretical perspective and a novel empirical approach. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 199. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00199
31.
HumeD. (1987). Of the standard of taste. In MillerE. F. (Ed.), Essays, moral, political, and literary(rev. ed., pp. 226–249). Liberty Fund. (Original work published 1757)
IshizuT.ZekiS. (2017). The experience of beauty derived from sorrow. Human Brain Mapping, 38(8), 4185–4200. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23657
34.
KanwisherN.McDermottJ.ChunM. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17(11), 4302–4311. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-11-04302.1997
35.
KasparK.KönigP. (2012). Emotions and personality traits as high-level factors in visual attention: A review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 321. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00321
LangP. J.BradleyM. M.CuthbertB. N. (2005). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual (pp. A-8). NIMH, Center for the Study of Emotion & Attention.
38.
LederH.BelkeB.OeberstA.AugustinD. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95(4), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1348/0007126042369811
39.
LederH.GergerG.DresslerS. G.SchabmannA. (2012). How art is appreciated. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(1), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026396
40.
LocherP.KrupinskiE. A.Mello-ThomsC.NodineC. F. (2008). Visual interest in pictorial art during an aesthetic experience. Spatial Vision, 21(1), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856808782713762
41.
LocherP. J.NodineC. F. (1987). Symmetry catches the eye. In O'ReganJ. K.Lévy-SchoenA. (Eds.), Eye movements from physiology to cognition (pp. 353–361). Elsevier.
42.
MarinM. M.LederH. (2022). Gaze patterns reveal aesthetic distance while viewing art. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1514(1), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14792
43.
MorrisJ. S.ÖhmanA.DolanR. J. (1998). Conscious and unconscious emotional learning in the human amygdala. Nature, 393(6684), 467–470. https://doi.org/10.1038/30976
44.
MurphyS. T.ZajoncR. B. (1993). Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 723–739. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.723
45.
NayakB. K.KarmakarS. (2019). A review of eye tracking studies related to visual aesthetic experience: A bottom-up approach. In ChakrabartiA. (Ed.), Research into design for a connected world: Proceedings of ICoRD 2019 (Vol. 2, pp. 391–403). Springer.
46.
O'DohertyJ.KringelbachM. L.RollsE. T.HornakJ.AndrewsC. (2001). Abstract reward and punishment representations in the human orbitofrontal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 4(1), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1038/82959
PapenmeierF.DagitG.WagnerC.SchwanS. (2024). Is it art? Effects of framing images as art versus non-art on gaze behavior and aesthetic judgments. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 18(4), 642–656. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000466
49.
PhillipsM. H.EdelmanJ. A. (2008). The dependence of visual scanning performance on saccade, fixation, and perceptual metrics. Vision Research, 48(7), 926–936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2007.12.020
50.
PihkoE.VirtanenA.SaarinenV. M.PannaschS.HirvenkariL.TossavainenT.HariR. (2011). Experiencing art: The influence of expertise and painting abstraction level. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 94. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00094
51.
RascheS. E.BeyhA.PaoliniM.ZekiS. (2023). The neural determinants of abstract beauty. European Journal of Neuroscience, 57(4), 633–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15912
52.
RascheS. E.BeyhA.PaoliniM.ZekiS. (2024). Neural correlates of the experience of ugliness. European Journal of Neuroscience, 60(7), 5671–5679. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.16517
53.
ReberR.SchwarzN.WinkielmanP. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364–382. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3
54.
RussellJ. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–1178. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077714
55.
SatoW.KochiyamaT.MinemotoK.SawadaR.FushikiT. (2019). Amygdala activation during unconscious visual processing of food. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 7277. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43733-2
56.
SchützA. C.BraunD. I.GegenfurtnerK. R. (2011). Eye movements and perception: A selective review. Journal of Vision, 11(5), 9. https://doi.org/10.1167/11.5.9
57.
SilviaP. J. (2005). Cognitive appraisals and interest in visual art: Exploring an appraisal theory of aesthetic emotions. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 23(2), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.2190/12AV-AH2P-MCEH-289E
58.
StorbeckJ.RobinsonM. D.McCourtM. E. (2006). Semantic processing precedes affect retrieval: The neurological case for cognitive primacy in visual processing. Review of General Psychology, 10(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.10.1.41
59.
UlusoyM.SahinN. H.ErkmenH. (1998). Turkish version of the beck anxiety inventory: Psychometric properties. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 12(2), 163–172.
60.
Van GeertE.BossensC.WagemansJ. (2023). The order & complexity toolbox for aesthetics (OCTA): A systematic approach to study the relations between order, complexity, and aesthetic appreciation. Behavior Research Methods, 55(5), 2423–2446. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01900-w
61.
WallravenC.CunninghamD. W.RigauJ.FeixasM.SbertM. (2009, May). Aesthetic appraisal of art: From eye movements to computers. In Computational aesthetics 2009: Eurographics workshop on computational aesthetics in graphics, visualization and imaging (pp. 137–144). Eurographics.
62.
WhalenP. J.RauchS. L.EtcoffN. L.McInerneyS. C.LeeM. B.JenikeM. A. (1998). Masked presentations of emotional facial expressions modulate amygdala activity without explicit knowledge. Journal of Neuroscience, 18(1), 411–418. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-01-00411.1998
63.
ZangemeisterW. H.ShermanK.StarkL. (1995). Evidence for a global scanpath strategy in viewing abstract compared with realistic images. Neuropsychologia, 33(8), 1009–1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(95)00014-T
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
