The inclusion of isolated white frames devoid of figurative information, whose function is to trigger an impact on the viewer, constitutes a deliberate audiovisual strategy. In the present study, 99 films were identified that contain at least one isolated white frame, totaling 740 target stimuli. Through inductive analysis, specific narrative contexts associated with the use of white frames were categorized as follows: (I) explosions or shots, (II) lights, (III) spatial/temporal jumps (IV) mental images (V) chromatic changes, and (VI) hits. Statistical analysis indicated a tendency for the white frame to be accompanied by a sound mark, as well as to appear associated with a triggering event. Similarly, we could differentiate how when it is associated with an explosion or a light were usually embedded during the shot, while chromatic changes or spatial/temporal jumps are usually incorporated in editing cuts.
BakurovI.BuzzelliM.SchettiniR.CastelliM.VanneschiL. (2022). Structural similarity index (SSIM) revisited: A data-driven approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 189(1), 116087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116087
BenjaminW. (2005). Libro de los pasajes. Ediciones Akal.
4.
BenjaminW. (2008). The work of art in the age of its technological reproducibility, and other writings on media. Harvard University Press.
5.
BordwellD. (1991). Interpretation as construction. In BordwellD. (Ed.), Making meaning: Inference and rhetoric in the interpretation of cinema (pp. 1–7). Harvard University Press.
BrownlowK. (1968). The Parade's Gone By…University of California Press.
8.
BurchN. (1987). La Lucarne de l’infini. Naissance du langage cinématographique. Éditions Nathan.
9.
ChaterN.ManningC. (2006). Probabilistic models of language processing and acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(7), 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.006
10.
ClarkA. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000477
11.
Cohen-SéatG. (1958). Essai sur les principes d'une philosophie du cinéma. Presses universitaires de France.
12.
CuttingJ. E. (2016). Narrative theory and the dynamics of popular movies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(6), 1713–1743. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1051-4
13.
CuttingJ. E. (2021). Movies on our minds: The evolution of cinematic engagement. Oxford University Press.
FauconT. (2009). Penser et expérimenter le montage. Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle.
16.
GaudreaultA.Le ForestierL. (2022). De l’assemblage au montage cinématographique: Instauration et standardisation d’une pratique. Presses de l’Université de Montréal.
17.
GunningT. (2025). The attractions of the moving image: Essays on history, theory, and the Avant-Garde. University of Chicago Press.
18.
HalimB. A.FaizaT.SeridiH. (2019). Shot boundary detection: Fundamental concepts and survey. In International conference on innovative trends in computer science (pp. 34–40).
19.
HeddleJ. (1974). Visionary film: The American avant-garde. Oxford University Press.
20.
HuffM.JacobsenC.PapenmeierF. (2025). Edit blindness is not related to immersion and presence in hollywood movies. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 19(2), 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000542
21.
JamesonF. (1991). Postmodernism, or, the cultural logic of late capitalism. Duke University Press.
22.
JullierL. (2002). Cinéma et cognition. L’Harmattan.
23.
López AliagaG. (2023). La eminencia gris. Conversaciones en la sala de montaje cinematográfico. Tirant Lo Blanch.
24.
LoschkyL. C.LarsonA. M.SmithT. J.MaglianoJ. P. (2020). The scene perception & event comprehension theory (SPECT) applied to visual narratives. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12(1), 311–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12455
25.
MaglianoJ. P.MillerJ.ZwaanR. A. (2001). Indexing space and time in film understanding. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 15(5), 533–545. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.724
SchiavoneR. (2002). Montare un film. Dalla moviola al montaggio digitale. Un manuale pratico. Dino Audino Editore.
35.
SchwanS.IldirarS. (2010). Watching film for the first time: How adult viewers interpret perceptual discontinuities in film. Psychological Science, 21(7), 970–976. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610372632
36.
ShaviroS. (2009). Post cinematic affect. O Books.
37.
SmithT. J.HendersonJ. M. (2008). Edit Blindness: The relationship between attention and global change blindness in dynamic scenes. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.2.2.6
38.
StewartG. (1999). Between film and screen: Modernism's photo synthesis. University of Chicago Press.
39.
TanE.DoicaruM. M.HakemulderF.BalintK.KuijpersM. M. (2017). Into film. In HakemulderF.BálintK.TanS.KuijpersM. M. (Eds.), Narrative absorption (pp. 97–118). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
TerukinaI. (2005). El Fotograma es una Imagen Estática… sin embargo, se Mueve. Razón y Palabra, 46, 1–16.
42.
TsivianY. (2009). Cinemetrics, part of the Humanities’ cyberinfrastructure. In RossM.GrauerM.FreislebenB. (Eds.), Digital tools in media studies: Analysis and research. An overview (pp. 93–100). Transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839410233
43.
WangZ.BovikA. C.SheikhH. R.SimoncelliE. P. (2004). Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13(4), 600–612. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2003.819861
44.
WolfW. (2004). Aesthetic illusion as an effect of fiction. Style, 38(3), 325–350. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5325/style.38.3.325
