The current study aimed to investigate the antecedents of choreographic adaptability at the psychological and cognitive levels among professional Ukrainian choreographers and contemporary dancers in the context of global and national transformations. One hundred ninety-four participants from 46 Ukrainian cities were surveyed using six instruments: The Choreographic Transformation Questionnaire, the Flow Short Scale, the Body Self-Attitude Typology Scale, the Executive Network Activity Scale, the Passive Neurocognitive Activity Scale, and the Objective Cognitive Evaluation Scale. Heterogeneity in correlation patterns was significant, with choreographers exhibiting larger innovation-executive function and smaller symbolic embodiment-flow correlations. Dancers showed stronger symbolic links between embodiment and flow, whereas choreographers relied more on executive and metacognitive resources. Mediation analyses identified objective cognitive evaluation (cognitive–emotional flexibility) as a partial mediator between internal embodiment and overall innovation-readiness among choreographers. The results show that artistic adaptability in Ukrainian choreographic community members includes principal roles for psychological embodiment, flow, and cognitive control.
BazelaD.PavliukT.BabychO.BatieievaN.KyzimP. (2022). Contemporary global trends in choreographic art development at the beginning of the 21st century. SPORT TK-EuroAmerican Journal of Sport Sciences, 11, 60. https://doi.org/10.6018/sportk.536581
BirringerJ. (2008). Performance, technology and science. PAJ Publications.
4.
BlahovaT. (2021). Choreographic education development in Ukraine in the structure of culture and art educational institutions. UNESCO Chair Journal Lifelong Professional Education in the XXI Century, 1(3), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.35387/ucj.1(3).2021.58-65
5.
BläsingB.Calvo-MerinoB.CrossE. S.JolaC.HonischJ.StevensC. J. (2012). Neurocognitive control in dance perception and performance. Acta Psychologica, 139(2), 300–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.12.005
6.
BroadhurstS. (2007). Digital practices: Aesthetic and neuroesthetic approaches to performance. Palgrave Macmillan.
BuckR.SnookB. (2020). How might creative learning through dance support resilience?Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 30(3), 289–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2019.1680474
9.
CasaleC. E.MoffatR.CrossE. S. (2024). Aesthetic evaluation of body movements shaped by embodied and arts experience: Insights from behaviour and fNIRS. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 25841. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-75427-9
10.
ChichininaE.BukhalenkovaD.TvardovskayaA.SemyonovY.GavrilovaM.AlmazovaO. (2022). The relationship between executive functions and dance classes in preschool age children. Education Sciences, 12(11), 788. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110788
11.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.
HefferonK. M.OllisS. (2007). “Just clicks”: An interpretive phenomenological analysis of professional dancers’ experience of flow. Research in Dance Education, 7(2), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647890601029527
14.
JaqueS. V.ThomsonP.ZaragozaJ.WernerF.PodeszwaJ.JacobsK. (2020). Creative flow and physiologic states in dancers during performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 1000. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01000
15.
KarpenkoD. (2022). Theoretical understanding of “choregraphic culture” concept in scientific discourse. National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald, 2022(4), 30–34. https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.4.2022.269427
KhomulenkoT. B.KramchenkovaV. O.TurkovaD. M. (2019). Bodily locus of control as coping. In Peculiarity in Crisis Conditions and Critical Life Situations: Materials of the V International Scientific and Practical Conference (Sumy, February 28 – March 1, 2019) (pp. 361–363). Sumy: Vydavnytstvo SumDPU imeni A. S. Makarenka.
18.
KolomiietsA MMuzykaY O (2023). Features of the activities of the vinnytsia city center for artistic and choreographic education of children and youth “barvinok”. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, 2(38), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_ijitss/30062023/7985
19.
KurtievaK. (2024). Folk-stage dance of the carpathian region as a folklore basis of contemporary choreographic art. Folk Art and Ethnology, 1(401), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.15407/nte2024.01.097
20.
KvetskoO. Y. (2022). Choreographic art of Ukraine in the context of globalization: Challenges of war. In Peculiarities of the Work of a Choreographer in the Modern Socio-Cultural Space: Materials of the VII International Scientific and Practical Conference (Kyiv, June 3, 2022) (pp. 16–19). Kyiv: NAKKKiM.
21.
KyrylenkoI. M. (2023). Dynamics of the development of choreographic culture and education. Scientific Bulletin of South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University Named After K. D. Ushynsky, 1(142), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.24195/2617-6688-2023-1-3
22.
LegrandD.RavnS. (2009). Perceiving subjectivity in bodily movement: The case of dancers. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8(3), 389–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-009-9135-5
23.
LindbergL.MarinA.SilvermanZ. (2023). Improvisational dance as enactive cognition: What do novice dancers teach us about embodied cognition in dance?Journal of Dance Education, 23(4), 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/15290824.2021.1957480
24.
LukyanenkoK. (2023). Contemporary dance in choreographic art of Ukraine. National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald, 2023(2), 117–121. https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.2.2023.286887
25.
LytvynenkoV APerovaG.MyroniukN.KrysA.KoresandovychN.MorozovA. (2023). Analysis of modern trends in contemporary choreographic art: The challenges of digitalization. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 12(3), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v12n3p198
26.
NebesnykA. (2018). Studies of contemporary dance in Ukraine at the end of the 20th – beginning of the 21st century. Art Notes, 33, 346–351. https://doi.org/10.32461/149835
OstroverkhT.PavliukT.DegtiarD.MyroniukN.KorytnaA.BoichenkoO. (2022). Regional choreographic schools in Ukraine: The socio-cultural and pedagogical aspects. SPORT TK – Revista EuroAmericana de Ciencias del Deporte, 11(Suppl 3), 64–76. https://doi.org/10.6018/sportk.535221
PlakhotniukO. (2013). Folk-jazz dance in the context of the development of modern choreographic art of Ukraine. Visnyk of the Lviv University. Series: Art Studies, 2013(12), 242–247. https://doi.org/10.30970/vas.12.2013.3067
32.
PlakhotniukO. (2022). Scientific search for applicants for the specialty choreography, which are factors in the formation of an individual educational trajectory. Actual Problems of the Humanities, 53(2), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.24919/2308-4863/53-2-10
33.
Preciado-AzanzaG.AkinleyeA. (2020). Dancing the digital age: A survey of the new technologies in the choreographic process. Journal of Genius and Eminence, 5(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.18536/jge.2020.01.04
34.
PriceT. F.PetersonC. K.Harmon-JonesE. (2012). The emotive neuroscience of embodiment. Motivation and Emotion, 36(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9258-1
RheinbergF.VollmeyerR.EngeserS. (2003). Die Erfassung des Flow-Erlebens. In Stiensmeier-PelsterJ.RheinbergF. (Eds.), Diagnostik von Selbstkonzept, Lernmotivation und Selbstregulation (pp. 261–279). Hogrefe.
37.
SadovenkoS. M. (2023). Choreographic culture of Ukraine and the creativity of radu poklitaru in theoretical discourse. Bulletin of the National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts, 2(2023), 111–116. https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.2.2023.286886
38.
Salazar SutilN. (2015). Motion and representation: The language of human movement. MIT Press.
39.
SerdyukR. V. (2023). The development of Ukrainian choreographic art in the second half of the 20th – early 21st century. Vinnytsia State Pedagogical University named after M. Kotsiubynsky.
40.
SeredaS.LunovV. (2024). Scale of cognitive assessment of executive network activity. In MatiashM.MaksymenkoS.LunovV.PavlovA.TkachB.SeredaS. (Eds.), Integrative foundations of medical psychology: Normogenesis, neuroscience and health behavior (pp. 69–70). Ludmila Publishing House.
41.
ShapiroL. (2011). Embodied cognition. Routledge.
42.
ShevchukO.LehkaI. (2024). Local aspect in Ukrainian dance as a factor of individualization of the choreographic language. Culture of Ukraine, 2024(86), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.31516/2410-5325.086.10
43.
SokilL. (2024). Interpretation of literary works in the choreographic art of Ukraine of the 20th – early 21st centuries. Philosophical Horizons, 2024(48), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.33989/2075-1443.2024.48.308075
44.
SokoliukL.NaidenkoV.KhudiakovaA. (2022). Interaction of arts in the works of Ukrainian artists at the turn of the 20th–21st centuries (based on the example of the kharkiv school). Scientific Journal Artistic Culture. Current Issues, 18(2), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.31500/1992-5514.18(2).2022.269776
45.
SwannC.KeeganR. J.PiggottD.CrustL. (2012). A systematic review of the experience, occurrence, and controllability of flow states in elite sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(6), 807–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.05.006
46.
ThomsonP.JaqueS. V. (2023). Creativity and flow: Not a simple relationship. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 57(1), 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.586
47.
TkachenkoO. (2024). Ballroom dance in the school education system of Ukraine in wartime: Challenges and prospects. In Artistic Practices and Art Education in the Cross-Cultural Space of Modernity: Materials of the VII All-Ukrainian Scientific-Practical Conference (Poltava, October 9–10, 2024) (pp. 98–100). Poltava: V. G. Korolenko National Polytechnic University.
48.
WhatleyS.CisnerosR. K.SabiescuA.2018). Digital echoes: Spaces for intangible and performance-based cultural heritage. Palgrave Macmillan.
49.
YatsenkoO.KhomiachykI.HladkaL.VasinaN.KoresandovychN.SlupskaN. (2022). Systemic interaction between educators of choreographic disciplines under distance learning conditions. SPORT TK – EuroAmerican Journal of Sport Sciences, 11, Article 17. https://doi.org/10.6018/sportk.538971
50.
ZabelinaD. L.FriedmanN. P.Andrews-HannaJ. (2019). Unity and diversity of executive functions in creativity. Consciousness and Cognition, 68, 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2018.12.005
51.
ZaietsS.MarkinaV. (2023). Formation of the national consciousness of Ukrainians in the context of socio-choreographic projects in wartime. Politeness. Humanitas, 4, 11–17. https://doi.org/10.32782/humanitas/2023.4.2
