The present study tested the effect of title type on the aesthetic evaluation of Japanese poetry. Ninety participants read a Japanese poem presented with either a “descriptive” title, an “elaborative” title, or no title. Participants then gave ratings according to their aesthetic experiences on the poem. The results revealed that the title type significantly influenced the readers’ aesthetic evaluations. Specifically, descriptive titles promoted more thought about the poem compared to elaborative titles. This finding can be attributed to the enhanced processing fluency afforded by descriptive titles, which allows readers to more readily understand and grasp the key characteristics of the poem, thereby facilitating thought evocation. These results extend previous findings on the influence of titles on the aesthetic appreciation of paintings and music to the domain of poetry. Furthermore, they highlight the role of processing fluency in possibly mediating the relationship between title type and aesthetic evaluation.
AlterA. L.OppenheimerD. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(3), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309341564
2.
Anglada-TortM.SteffensJ.MüllensiefenD. (2019). Names and titles matter: The impact of linguistic fluency and the affect heuristic on aesthetic and value judgements of music. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(3), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000172
3.
BelfiA. M.VesselE. A.StarrG. G. (2018). Individual ratings of vividness predict aesthetic appeal in poetry. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(3), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000153
4.
BelkeB.LederH.StrobachT.CarbonC.-C. (2010). Cognitive fluency: High-level processing dynamics in art appreciation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(4), 214–222. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019648
5.
BignardiG.IshizuT.ZekiS. (2021). The differential power of extraneous influences to modify aesthetic judgments of biological and artifactual stimuli. PsyCh Journal, 10(2), 190–199. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.415
6.
BrunerJ. S.MinturnA. L. (1955). Perceptual identification and perceptual organization. The Journal of General Psychology, 53(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1955.9710133
7.
CleeremansA.GinsburghV.KleinO.NouryA. (2016). What’s in a name? The effect of an artist’s name on aesthetic judgments. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 34(1), 126–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276237415621197
8.
GaoC.GuoC. (2018). The experience of beauty of Chinese poetry and its neural substrates. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1540. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01540
9.
GergerG.LederH. (2015). Titles change the esthetic appreciations of paintings. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 464. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00464
10.
HitsuwariJ.NomuraM. (2022a). Ambiguity and beauty: Japanese-German cross-cultural comparisons on aesthetic evaluation of haiku poetry. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000497
11.
HitsuwariJ.NomuraM. (2022b). How individual states and traits predict aesthetic appreciation of Haiku poetry. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 40(1), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276237420986420
JacobsA. M. (2015). Neurocognitive poetics: Methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00186
14.
KirkU.SkovM.HulmeO.ChristensenM. S.ZekiS. (2009). Modulation of aesthetic value by semantic context: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 44(3), 1125–1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.009
15.
KraxenbergerM.MenninghausW. (2017). Affinity for poetry and aesthetic appreciation of joyful and sad poems. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(2051), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02051
16.
LauringJ. O.PelowskiM.ForsterM.GondanM.PtitoM.KupersR. (2016). Well, if they like it… effects of social groups’ ratings and price information on the appreciation of art. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(3), 344–359. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000063
17.
LederH.BelkeB.OeberstA.AugustinD. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95(4), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1348/0007126042369811
18.
LederH.CarbonC.-C.RipsasA.-L. (2006). Entitling art: Influence of title information on understanding and appreciation of paintings. Acta Psychologica, 121(2), 176–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.08.005
19.
MargulisE. H.LevineW. H.Simchy-GrossR.KrogerC. (2017). Expressive intent, ambiguity, and aesthetic experiences of music and poetry. PLOS ONE, 12(7), e0179145. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179145
20.
MenninghausW.BohrnI. C.KnoopC. A.KotzS. A.SchlotzW.JacobsA. M. (2015). Rhetorical features facilitate prosodic processing while handicapping ease of semantic comprehension. Cognition, 143, 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.026
21.
MillisK. (2001). Making meaning brings pleasure: The influence of titles on aesthetic experiences. Emotion, 1(3), 320–329. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.1.3.320
22.
MullennixJ. W.PilotK. M.SteevesT. A.BurnsJ. C. (2018). The effects of cognitive load on judgments of titled visual art. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(2), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000128
23.
ObermeierC.KotzS. A.JessenS.RaettigT.von KoppenfelsM.MenninghausW. (2016). Aesthetic appreciation of poetry correlates with ease of processing in event-related potentials. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 16(2), 362–373. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-015-0396-x
24.
ObermeierC.MenninghausW.von KoppenfelsM.RaettigT.Schmidt-KassowM.OtterbeinS.KotzS. A. (2013). Aesthetic and Emotional Effects of Meter and Rhyme in Poetry. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00010
25.
ReberR.SchwarzN.WinkielmanP. (2004a). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience?Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364–382. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3
26.
ReberR.WinkielmanP.SchwarzN. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9(1), 45–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00008
27.
ReberR.WurtzP.ZimmermannT. D. (2004b). Exploring “fringe” consciousness: The subjective experience of perceptual fluency and its objective bases. Consciousness and Cognition, 13(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00049-7
SwamiV. (2013). Context matters: Investigating the impact of contextual information on aesthetic appreciation of paintings by Max Ernst and Pablo Picasso. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(3), 285–295. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030965
30.
WallotS.MenninghausW. (2018). Ambiguity effects of rhyme and meter. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(12), 1947–1954. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000557
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
