Aesthetic appreciation of dance is associated with external components of physical features and audiences’ subjective aspects, which can be explained by cross-modal integration. In this study, we designed aesthetic appraisal tasks measured on a 5-point Likert scale by manipulating audiovisual combinations of dance movements and musical properties to measure novices and experts’ interest appraisals. Using statistical analyses and psychometric curve fitting, we found that novices judged that variations in travel patterns on stage and moving the entire body were interesting. In contrast, experts judged that the variation in the dancer's upper body parts synchronized only with the time signature was interesting. Accordingly, while novices had a low interest decision threshold for dancing across the stage and a high range of body configurations, experts had a high threshold for those cases. Overall, only experts had the ability to integrate audiovisual contents to appreciate the aesthetic values in dance movements.
AlbrechtD. G.HamiltonD. B. (1982). Striate cortex of monkey and cat: Contrast response function. Journal of Neurophysiology, 48(1), 217–237. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1982.48.1.217
3.
Alcalá-QuintanaR.García-PérezM. (2009). Fixed vs. variable noise in 2AFC contrast discrimination: Lessons from psychometric functions. Retrieved June 30, 2020 from https://doi.org/10.1163/156856809788746309
4.
AtkinsonA. P.TunstallM. L.DittrichW. H. (2007). Evidence for distinct contributions of form and motion information to the recognition of emotions from body gestures. Cognition, 104(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.005
BerlyneD. E. (1974). Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: Steps toward an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
7.
BläsingB.Calvo-MerinoB.CrossE. S.JolaC.HonischJ.StevensC. J. (2012). Neurocognitive control in dance perception and performance. Acta Psychologica, 139(2), 300–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.12.005
8.
Calvo-MerinoB.JolaC.GlaserD. E.HaggardP. (2008). Towards a sensorimotor aesthetics of performing art. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(3), 911–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.11.003
9.
ChapadosC.LevitinD. J. (2008). Cross-modal interactions in the experience of musical performances: Physiological correlates. Cognition, 108(3), 639–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.008
10.
CharnavelI. (2019). Steps towards a universal grammar of dance: Local grouping structure in basic human movement perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1364. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01364
11.
ChristensenJ. F.GaiggS. B.GomilaA.OkeP.Calvo-MerinoB. (2014). Enhancing emotional experiences to dance through music: The role of valence and arousal in the cross-modal bias. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 757. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00757
12.
ChristensenJ. F.GomilaA.GaiggS. B.SivarajahN.Calvo-MerinoB. (2016). Dance expertise modulates behavioral and psychophysiological responses to affective body movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(8), 1139. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000176
De SilvaP. R.Bianchi-BerthouzeN. (2004). Modeling human affective postures: An information theoretic characterization of posture features. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds, 15(3–4), 269–276. https://doi.org/10.1002/cav.29
15.
DixonS. (2015). Digital performance: A history of new media in theater, dance, performance art, and installation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16.
FaynK.SilviaP. J.ErbasY.TiliopoulosN.KuppensP. (2018). Nuanced aesthetic emotions: Emotion differentiation is related to knowledge of the arts and curiosity. Cognition and Emotion, 32(3), 593–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2017.1322554
17.
ForsytheA.NadalM.SheehyN.Cela-CondeC. J.SaweyM. (2011). Predicting beauty: Fractal dimension and visual complexity in art. British Journal of Psychology, 102(1), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712610X498958
18.
GeringerJ. M.MadsenC. K. (2003). Gradual tempo change and aesthetic responses of music majors. International Journal of Music Education, (1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/025576140304000102
19.
GlowinskiD.MortillaroM.SchererK.DaelN.VolpeG.CamurriA. (2015, September). Towards a minimal representation of affective gestures. 2015 International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII), Xi’an, China (pp. 498–504). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACII.2015.7344616
20.
GolomerE.DupuiP. (2000). Spectral analysis of adult dancers’ sways: sex and interaction vision-proprioception. International Journal of Neuroscience, 105(1-4), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.3109/00207450009003262
21.
HassN. C.SchneiderE. J.LimS. L. (2015). Emotional expressions of old faces are perceived as more positive and less negative than young faces in young adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1276. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01276
22.
HenleyM. K. (2015). Comparison of shape, space, and time judgments in expert dancers and novices: Evidence that production enhances perception. Journal of Dance Medicine & Science, 19(3), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.12678/1089-313X.19.3.103
23.
HidiS. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60(4), 549–571. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060004549
24.
HowlinC.VicaryS.OrgsG. (2020). Audiovisual aesthetics of sound and movement in contemporary dance. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 38(2), 191–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276237418818633
25.
HuangL.DobkinsK. R. (2005). Attentional effects on contrast discrimination in humans: Evidence for both contrast gain and response gain. Vision Research, 45(9), 1201–1212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2004.10.024
26.
JamesJ.IngallsT.QianG.OlsenL.WhiteleyD.WongS.RikakisT. (2006, October). Movement-based interactive dance performance. Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on multimedia, ACM, New York (pp. 470–480). https://doi.org/10.1145/1180639.1180733
27.
JolaC.Abedian-AmiriA.KuppuswamyA.PollickF. E.GrosbrasM. H. (2012). Motor simulation without motor expertise: Enhanced corticospinal excitability in visually experienced dance spectators. PLoS One, 7(3), e33343. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033343
28.
JolaC.DavisA.HaggardP. (2011). Proprioceptive integration and body representation: Insights into dancers’ expertise. Experimental Brain Research, 213(2–3), 257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2743-7
29.
JolaC.PollickF. E.Calvo-MerinoB. (2014). “Some like it hot”: Spectators who score high on the personality trait openness enjoy the excitement of hearing dancers breathing without music. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 718. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00718
30.
KirschL. P.DawsonK.CrossE. S. (2015). Dance experience sculpts aesthetic perception and related brain circuits. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1337(1), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12634
31.
KleinsmithA.Bianchi-BerthouzeN. (2007, September). Recognizing affective dimensions from body posture. International conference on affective computing and intelligent interaction (pp. 48–58), Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74889-2_5
32.
KleinsmithA.Bianchi-BerthouzeN. (2012). Affective body expression perception and recognition: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 4(1), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.1109/T-AFFC.2012.16
33.
KleinsmithA.Bianchi-BerthouzeN.SteedA. (2011). Automatic recognition of non-acted affective postures. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), 41(4), 1027–1038. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCB.2010.2103557
34.
LederH.BelkeB.OeberstA.AugustinD. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95(4), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1348/0007126042369811
35.
LeeT. H.ChoiJ. S.ChoY. S. (2012). Context modulation of facial emotion perception differed by individual difference. PLoS One, 7(3), e32987. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032987
36.
LeeI. E.LatchoumaneC. F.JeongJ. (2017). Arousal rules: An empirical investigation into the aesthetic experience of cross-modal perception with emotional visual music. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 440. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00440
MaldonatoN. M.SperandeoR.CocoM.CioffiV.de LuciaS.MoscaL. L.EspositoA. (2020, September). Multimodal integrative perception: Biological correlates and qualitative experiences. 2020 11th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom), Mariehamn, Finland (pp. 000267–000272). https://doi.org/10.1109/CogInfoCom50765.2020.9237912
39.
McDanielM. A.WaddillP. J.FinstadK.BourgT. (2000). The effects of text-based interest on attention and recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 492. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.492
40.
NadalM.MunarE.MartyG.Cela-CondeC. J. (2010). Visual complexity and beauty appreciation: Explaining the divergence of results. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 28(2), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.2190/EM.28.2.d
OrgsG.HaguraN.HaggardP. (2013). Learning to like it: Aesthetic perception of bodies, movements and choreographic structure. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(2), 603–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.03.010
43.
OrlandiA.CrossE. S.OrgsG. (2020). Timing is everything: Dance aesthetics depend on the complexity of movement kinematics. Cognition, 205, 104446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104446
OulasvirtaA.RoosT.ModigA.LeppänenL. (2013, April). Information capacity of full-body movements. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Paris, France (pp. 1289–1298). https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466169
PoikonenH.ToiviainenP.TervaniemiM. (2018). Dance on cortex: Enhanced theta synchrony in experts when watching a dance piece. European Journal of Neuroscience, 47(5), 433–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13838
48.
ReasonM.JolaC.KayR.ReynoldsD.KauppiJ. P.GrobrasM. H.TohkaJ.PollickF. E. (2016). Spectators’ aesthetic experience of sound and movement in dance performance: A transdisciplinary investigation.Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040032
49.
RenningerK. A.HidiS. (2011). Revisiting the conceptualization, measurement, and generation of interest. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 168–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.587723
RoetherC. L.OmlorL.ChristensenA.GieseM. A. (2009a). Critical features for the perception of emotion from gait. Journal of Vision, 9(6), 15–15. https://doi.org/10.1167/9.6.15
52.
RoetherC. L.OmlorL.GieseM. A. (2009b). Features in the recognition of emotions from dynamic bodily expression. In U. Ilg & G. Masson (Eds.), Dynamics of visual motion processing (pp. 313–340). Boston, MA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0781-3_14
53.
SclarG.MaunsellJ. H.LennieP. (1990). Coding of image contrast in central visual pathways of the macaque monkey. Vision Research, 30(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(90)90123-3
54.
SilviaP. J. (2010). Confusion and interest: The role of knowledge emotions in aesthetic experience. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(2), 75. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017081
55.
SilviaP. J. (2013). Interested experts, confused novices: Art expertise and the knowledge emotions. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 31(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.2190/EM.31.1.f
56.
SiorosG.MironM.DaviesM.GouyonF.MadisonG. (2014). Syncopation creates the sensation of groove in synthesized music examples. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1036. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01036
TorrentsC.CastañerM.JofreT.MoreyG.ReverterF. (2013). Kinematic parameters that influence the aesthetic perception of beauty in contemporary dance. Perception, 42(4), 447–458. https://doi.org/10.1068/p7117
59.
TorrentsC.CastañerM.ReverterF.MoreyG.JofreT. (2015). Dance teachers’ aesthetic perception of kinematic parameters. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(4), 442. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039757
60.
ToiviainenP.LuckG.ThompsonM. R. (2010). Embodied meter: hierarchical eigenmodes in music-induced movement. Music Perception, 28(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2010.28.1.59
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
