The way in which platforms curate and assemble the music they present plays an important role in mediating fields of artistic practice to audiences. The different curatorial logics of platforms help shape the way audiences understand the contours of a field of creative practice and the extent to which they are exposed to novel and unfamiliar sounds. This article draws on a large-scale content analysis of how classical music is represented on each of radio, digital playlists and live concert programming to investigate the degree to which each platform supports audiences to engage with unfamiliar music. Incorporating novel approaches to measuring familiarity, the results demonstrate that concerts provide the most diverse and varied programming, whereas digital playlists assemble the most homogeneous musical landscape for listeners. As audiences increasingly shift to digital platforms, these curatorial patterns have significant implications for artistic practices by limiting opportunities for less established and more esoteric voices.
[REF]AcordS. K. (2010). Beyond the head: The practical work of curating contemporary art. Qualitative Sociology, 33(4), 447–467. doi:10.1007/s11133-010-9164-y
2.
AhlkvistJ. A. (2001). Programming philosophies and the rationalization of music radio. Media, Culture & Society, 23(3), 339–358. doi:10.1177/016344301023003004
3.
AhlkvistJ. A.FisherG. (2000). And the hits just keep on coming: Music programming standardization in commercial radio. Poetics, 27(5), 301–325. doi:10.1016/S0304-422X(00)00007-3
BeckerH. S. (2004). Jazz places. In BennettA.PetersonR. A. (Eds.), Music scenes: Local, translocal, and virtual (pp. 17–27). Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
8.
BeerD. (2009). Power through the algorithm? Participatory web cultures and the technological unconscious. New Media & Society, 11(6), 985–1002. doi:10.1177/1461444809336551
9.
BogdanovD.WackN.Gómez GutiérrezE.GulatiS.Herrera BoyerP.MayorO., …X.Serra (2013). Essentia: An audio analysis library for music information retrieval. Paper presented at the International Society for Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR), Curitiba, Brazil.
10.
BornG. (2005). On musical mediation: Ontology, technology and creativity. Twentieth-Century Music, 2(1), 7–36. doi:10.1017/s147857220500023x
11.
BourdieuP. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
CarboniM. (2014). The digitization of music and the accessibility of the artist. Journal of Professional Communication, 3(2), 149–164.
13.
ChambersS. (2020a). Art music curation in Australia: Logs of classical music presented on ABC Classic FM (1996-2018), concert events (2009-2018), and Spotify playlists (2018). Retrieved fromhttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/566223
14.
ChambersS. (2020b). Distances in the field: Mapping similarity and familiarity in the production, curation and consumption of Australian art music (PhD thesis). Western Sydney University.
15.
Commonwealth of Australia. (2019). Report on the inquiry into the Australian music industry.
16.
DattaH.KnoxG.BronnenbergB. J. (2018). Changing their tune: How consumers’ adoption of online streaming affects music consumption and discovery. Marketing Science, 37(1), 5–21. doi:10.1287/mksc.2017.1051
17.
DobsonM. (2008). Exploring classical music concert attendance: The effects of concert venue and familiarity on audience experience. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the First International Conference of Students of Systematic Musicology, Graz, Austria.
18.
DuboisV.LepauxV. (2018). Towards a sociology of arts managers. Profiles, expectations and career choices. In DeVereauxC. (Ed.), Arts and cultural management: Sense and sensibilities in the state of the field (pp. 39–58). New York: Routledge.
19.
ErikssonM. (2020). The editorial playlist as container technology: On Spotify and the logistical role of digital music packages. Journal of Cultural Economy, 13(4), 415–427. doi:10.1080/17530350.2019.1708780
20.
ErnstM. D. (2004). Permutation methods: A basis for exact inference. Statistical Science, 19(4), 676–685. doi:10.1214/088342304000000396
HennionA. (2012). Music and mediation: Toward a new sociology of music. In ClaytonM.HerbertT.MiddletonR. (Eds.), The cultural study of music: A critical introduction (2nd ed., pp. 249–260). New York: Routledge.
23.
KajikawaL. (2019). The possessive investment in classical music: Confronting legacies of white supremacy in U.S. Schools and departments of music. In CrenshawK. W.HarrisL. C.HoSangD.LipsitzG. (Eds.), Seeing race again: Countering colorblindness across the disciplines (pp. 155–174). Oakland: University of California Press.
24.
KitchinR. (2017). Thinking critically about and researching algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 14–29. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154087
25.
KramerJ. D. (2016). Postmodern music, postmodern listening. New York: Bloomsbury Academy.
26.
LatourB. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
MarshallL. (2015). ‘Let’s keep music special. F—Spotify’: On-demand streaming and the controversy over artist royalties. Creative Industries Journal, 8(2), 177–189. doi:10.1080/17510694.2015.1096618
28.
MorrisJ. W. (2015). Curation by code: Infomediaries and the data mining of taste. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4–5), 446–463. doi:10.1177/1367549415577387
NowakR. (2016). When is a discovery? The affective dimensions of discovery in music consumption. Popular Communication, 14(3), 137–145. doi:10.1080/15405702.2016.1193182
31.
O’NeillP. (2016). The culture of curating and the curating of culture(s). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
32.
PereiraC. S.TeixeiraJ.FigueiredoP.XavierJ.CastroS. L.BratticoE. (2011). Music and emotions in the brain: Familiarity matters. PLoS One, 6(11), e27241. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027241
33.
PreyR. (2020). Locating power in platformization: Music streaming playlists and curatorial power. Social Media + Society, 6(2), 205630512093329. doi:10.1177/2056305120933291
34.
RyanJ. (1985). The production of culture in the music industry: The ASCAP-BMI controversy. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
35.
SkandalisA.BanisterE.ByromJ. (2016). Marketplace orchestration of taste: Insights from the bridgewater Hall. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(9–10), 926–943. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2016.1187196
