We investigated the biological and evolutionary significance of shape- and color-based traits—signals, elements, and markings—and asked what functions they serve across animals and plants. Within a framework grounded in perceptual organization, we combine experimental phenomenology with comparative analyses to examine how specific morphological and chromatic features (e.g., appendages, horns, elongated tails, spots, stripes, and other patterns) structure visual appearance and support recognition, communication, camouflage, and sexual signaling. The results support the principle of accentuation as a plausible perceptual mechanism that can be exploited by both natural and sexual selection, helping to explain why conspicuous traits cluster in particular body regions and why similar organizational solutions recur across species. Overall, the study clarifies the biological and psychological roles of shape and color in the evolution of visual appearance.
AlbertazziL. (2015). Philosophical background: Phenomenology. In WagemansJ. (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of perceptual organization (pp. 21–40). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199686858.013.048
2.
AttneaveF. (1968). Triangles as ambiguous figures. American Journal of Psychology, 81(3), 447–453. https://doi.org/10.2307/1420645
3.
BatesH. W. (1862). Contributions to an insect fauna of the Amazon valley. Lepidoptera: Heliconidae. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London, 23(3), 495–566. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1860.tb00146.x
4.
BülthoffH. H.MallotH. A. (1988). Integration of depth modules: Stereo and shading. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 5(10), 1749–1758. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.5.001749
5.
ChittkaL.SkorupskiP.RaineN. E. (2009). Speed–accuracy tradeoffs in animal decision making. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(7), 400–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.02.010
6.
CottH. B. (1940). Adaptive coloration in animals. Methuen & Co. Ltd.
7.
CuthillI. C.StevensM.SheppardJ.MaddocksT.PárragaC. A.TrosciankoT. S. (2005). Disruptive coloration and background pattern matching. Nature, 434(7029), 72–74. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03312
8.
DarwinC. (1859). The origin of species by means of natural selection. John Murray.
9.
DarwinC. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. John Murray.
De ValoisK. K. (2003). The role of color in spatial vision. In ChalupaL. M.WernerJ. S. (Eds.), The visual neurosciences (pp. 1003–1016). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7131.003.0069
12.
DorseyJ.RushmeierH.SillionF. (2008). Digital modeling of material appearance. Morgan Kaufmann/Elsevier.
13.
DrespB.LangleyK. (2006). Fine structural dependence of ultraviolet reflections in the king penguin beak horn. The Anatomical Record, Part A, 288(3), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.a.20314
14.
DrespB.LangleyK. (2009). The biologic significance of color. In SkusevichD.MatikasP. (Eds.), Color perception: Physiology, processes and analysis (pp. 110–115). Nova Science Publisher.
15.
DrespB.LangleyK. (2010). The importance of color perception to man and animals. Nova Science Publisher.
16.
DuhemP. (1906). La théorie physique. Son object et sa structure. Chevalier et Rivière.
17.
EdmundsM. (1974). Defence in animals. Longman Group Ltd.
18.
EndlerJ. A. (1978). A predator’s view of animal color patterns. In M. K. Hecht, W. C. Steere, & B. Wallace (Eds.), Evolutionary Biology (pp. 319–364). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6956-5_5.
EndlerJ. A. (1984). Progressive background matching in moths, and a quantitative measure of crypsis. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 22(3), 187–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1984.tb01677.x
21.
EndlerJ. A. (1988). Frequency-dependent predation, crypsis and aposematic coloration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 319(1196), 505–523. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1988.0062
22.
EndlerJ. A. (1991). Interactions between predators and prey. In KrebsJ. R.DavisN. B. (Eds.), Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach (3rd ed, pp. 169–196). Blackwell Scientific Publisher.
23.
ErnstM. O.BanksM. S. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415(6870), 429–433. https://doi.org/10.1038/415429a
FeldmanJ. (2000). Bias toward regular form in mental shape spaces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.26.1.152
FeldmanJ. (2003). Perceptual grouping by selection of a logically minimal model. International Journal of Computer Vision, 55(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024454423670
28.
FeldmanJ. (2007). Formation of visual “objects” in the early computation of spatial relations. Perception & Psychophysics, 69(5), 816–827. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193781
29.
FeldmanJ. (2009). Bayes And the simplicity principle in perception. Psychological Review, 116(4), 875–887. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017144
30.
FisherR. A. (1930). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon Press.
31.
FristonK. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory?Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2787
JohnstonA.PassmoreP. J. (1994). Independent encoding of surface orientation and surface curvature. Vision Research, 34(22), 3005–3012. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(94)90273-9
39.
KanizsaG. (1979). Organization in Vision. Praeger.
40.
KanizsaG. (1980). Grammatica del vedere. Il Mulino.
41.
KanizsaG. (1991). Vedere e pensare. Il Mulino.
42.
KnillD. C.PougetA. (2004). The Bayesian brain: The role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. Trends in Neurosciences, 27(12), 712–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2004.10.007
43.
KoenderinkJ. J. (2015). Methodological background: Experimental phenomenology. In WagemansJ. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of perceptual organization (pp. 41–54). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199686858.013.033
44.
KoenderinkJ. J.van DoornA. J.KappersA. M. L. (1992). Surface perception in pictures. Perception & Psychophysics, 52(5), 487–496. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206710
45.
KoffkaK. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. Harcourt, Brace and Company.
46.
KöhlerW. (1938). The place of value in a world of facts. Liveright Publishing Corporation.
LottoR. B.WickleinM. (2005). Bees encode behaviorally significant spectral relationships in complex scenes to resolve stimulus ambiguity. Proceedings of National Academy of Science USA, 102(46), 16870–16874. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0503773102
49.
MachE. (1959). The analysis of sensations and the relation of the physical to the psychical. Dover (Original work published 1922).
50.
MarkJ. T.MarionB. B.HoffmanD. D. (2010). Natural selection and veridical perceptions. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 266(4), 504–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.07.020
51.
MascalzoniE.OsorioD.RegolinL.VallortigaraG. (2012). Symmetry perception by poultry chicks and its implications for three-dimensional object recognition. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279(1730), 841–846. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.1486
52.
MerilaitaS.LindJ. (2006). Great tits (parus major) searching for artificial prey: Implications for cryptic coloration and symmetry. Behavioral Ecology, 17(1), 84–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arj007
53.
MetzgerW. (1963). Psychologie. Steinkopff Verlag.
54.
MetzgerW. (1975). Gesetze des Sehens. Kramer.
55.
Moreno-BoteR.RinzelJ.RubinN. (2007). Noise-induced alternations in an attractor network model of perceptual bistability. Journal of Neurophysiology, 98(3), 1125–1139. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01108.2006
PalmerS. E. (1980). What makes triangles point: Local and global effects in configurations of ambiguous triangles. Cognitive Psychology, 12(3), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(80)90012-2
60.
PalmerS. E.BucherN. M. (1981). Textural effect in perceiving pointing of ambiguous triangle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8(5), 693–708. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.8.5.693
61.
PinnaB. (1990). Il dubbio sull’apparire. Upsel Editore.
PinnaB. (2010a). New gestalt principles of perceptual organization: An extension from grouping to shape and meaning. Gestalt Theory, 32(1), 1–67.
64.
PinnaB. (2010b). What comes before psychophysics? The problem of “what we perceive” and the phenomenological exploration of new effects. Seeing & Perceiving, 23(5), 463–481. https://doi.org/10.1163/187847510x541144
65.
PinnaB. (2012a). What is the meaning of shape?Gestalt Theory, 33(3/4), 383–422.
66.
PinnaB. (2012b). Perceptual organization of shape, color, shade and lighting in visual and pictorial objects. i-Perception, 3(5), 257–281. https://doi.org/10.1068/i0460aap
67.
PinnaB. (2012c). The place of meaning in perception - Introduction. Gestalt Theory, 33(3-4), 221–244.
68.
PinnaB. (2013). What is a perceptual object? Beyond the gestalt theory of perceptual organization. In GeremekA.GreenleeM.MagnussenS. (Eds.), Beyond gestalt: Neural foundations of visual perception (pp. 48–66). Taylor & Francis.
69.
PinnaB. (2015). Directional organization and shape formation: New illusions and helmholtz's square. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(92), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00092
70.
PinnaB.AlbertazziL. (2011). From grouping to meaning. In AlbertazziL.van TonderG.VishwanathD. (Eds.), Perception beyond inference: The information content of visual processes (pp. 287–344). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8594.003.0016
PinnaB.DeianaK. (2015). Material properties from contours: New insights on object perception. Vision Research, 115(pt. B), 280–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2015.03.014
73.
PinnaB.KoenderinkJ.van DoornA. (2015). The phenomenology of the invisible: From visual syntax to “shape from shapes”. Philosophia Scientiae, 19(3), 127–151. https://doi.org/10.4000/philosophiascientiae.1135
74.
PinnaB.PorchedduD.DeianaK. (2016). From grouping to coupling: A new perceptual organization in vision, psychology, and biology. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(1051), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01051
75.
PinnaB.ReevesA. (2006). Lighting, backlighting and watercolor illusions and the laws of figurality. Spatial Vision, 19(2-4), 341–373. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856806776923434
76.
PinnaB.ReevesA. (2013). What is the purpose of color for living beings? Toward a theory of color organization. Psychological Research, 79(1), 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-013-0536-2
77.
PinnaB.ReevesA.KoenderinkJ.van DoornA.DeianaK. (2018). A new principle of figure-ground segregation: The accentuation. Vision Research, 143(1), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2017.08.009
78.
PinnaB.SiriguL. (2011). The accentuation principle of visual organization and the illusion of musical suspension. Seeing and Perceiving, 24(6), 595–621. https://doi.org/10.1163/187847611X603747
79.
PinnaB.SiriguL. (2016). The accentuation principle of figure–ground segregation and the downbeat illusion. Acta Psychologica, 170(1), 32–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.06.004
80.
PinnaB.SpillmannL. (2002). A new illusion of floating motion in depth. Perception, 31(12), 1501–1508. https://doi.org/10.1068/p3112pp
81.
PinnaB.SpillmannL. (2005). New illusions of sliding motion in depth. Perception, 34(12), 1441–1458. https://doi.org/10.1068/p3476
82.
PopperK. R. (1969). Conjectures and refutations. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
83.
PopperK. R. (1983). Postcript to the logic of scientific discovery, vol. 1: Realism and the aim of science. Hutchinson.
84.
PoultonE. B. (1890). The colours of animals: their meaning and use. Especially considered in the case of insects (2nd ed.). Kegan Paul, Trench Trübner and Co. Ltd.
85.
RogersB.CagenelloR. (1989). Disparity curvature and the perception of three-dimensional surfaces. Nature, 339(6220), 135–137. https://doi.org/10.1038/339135a0
86.
RosenthalG. G. (2017). Mate choice: The evolution of sexual decision making from microbes to humans. Princeton University Press.
87.
RosenthalG. G.EvansC. S. (1998). Female preference for swords in Xiphophorus helleri reflects a bias for large apparent size. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95(8), 4431–4436. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.8.4431
88.
RussellR. (2009). A sex difference in facial contrast and its exaggeration by cosmetics. Perception, 38(8), 1211–1219. https://doi.org/10.1068/p6331
89.
RuxtonG. D.SherrattT. N.SpeedM. P. (2004). Avoiding Attack: the Evolutionary Ecology of Crypsis, Warning Signals and Mimicry. Oxford University Press.
90.
SchumannF. (1900). Beiträge zur analyse der gesichtswahrnehmungen. Erste abhandlung. Einige beobachtungen über die zusam-menfassung von gesichtseindrücken zu einheiten. Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane, 23(1), 1–32.
91.
SpillmannL.EhrensteinW. H. (2004). Gestalt factors in the visual neurosciences. In ChalupaL.WernerJ. S. (Eds.), The visual neurosciences (pp. 181–197). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7131.003.0121
92.
StephenI. D.SmithM. J. L.StirratM. R.PerrettD. I. (2009). Facial skin coloration affects perceived health of human faces. International Journal of Primatology, 30(6), 845–857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-009-9380-z
VerstegenI. (2005). Mona lisa’s smile. The place of experimental phenomenology within gestalt theory. Gestalt Theory, 27(2), 91–106.
95.
WallaceA. R. (1889). Darwinism. An exposition of the theory of natural selection with some of its applications. Macmillan.
96.
WeissY.SimoncelliE. P.AdelsonE. H. (2002). Motion illusions as optimal percepts. Nature Neuroscience, 5(6), 598–604. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn858
97.
WilkinsL.MarshallN. J.JohnsenS.OsorioD. (2016). Modelling fish colour constancy, and the implications for vision and signalling in water. Journal of Experimental Biology, 219(Pt 12), 1884–1892. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.139147
ZylinskiS.OsorioD.JohnsenS. (2016). Cuttlefish see shape from shading, finetuning coloration in response to pictorial depth cues and directional illumination. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 283(1826), 1–7. 10.1098/rspb.2016.0062
