Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Imagination is a primordial cognitive capacity that enables humans to transcend their immediate reality and explore a world of possibilities. Traditionally, it has been understood as a purely mental, internal faculty resulting from introspective intellectual exercise. However, imaginative capacities would be severely limited without practical interaction. Accordingly, this paper adopts a post-cognitivist framework—particularly enactivism and ecological psychology—to account for the embodied, distributed, and environmentally mediated nature of human imagination. The ecological-enactive model proposes that imagination arises from sensorimotor simulation (Level 1) and the exploration of socio-material affordances (Level 2), both of which are mediated by artifacts and cultural practices. This approach is illustrated with the case of the Colombian “vueltiao” (rolled) hat, showing how artisans’ micro-embodied skills and the rich material and workshop environment shape a repertoire of imaginative possibilities.

Keywords

imagination post-cognitivism enactivism ecological psychology affordances

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abraham

(2016). The imaginative mind. Human Brain Mapping, 37(11), 4197–4211. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23300

Abraham

(2020). Surveying the imagination landscape. In Abraham

(Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the imagination (pp. 1–10). Cambridge University Press.

Aristóteles. (2005). De Anima (T. Calvo Martínez, Trad.). Gredos.

Ayman-Nolley

(1992). Vygotsky’s perspective on the development of imagination and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 5(1), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419209534424

Broncano

(2008). In media res: Cultura material y artefactos. ArtefaCToS. Revista De Estudios Sobre La Ciencia Y La tecnología, 1(1), 18–32. https://revistas.usal.es/cinco/index.php/artefactos/article/view/13

Broncano

(2012). La estrategia del simbionte. Cultural material para nuevas humanidades. Delirio.

Broncano

(2013). Sujetos en la niebla. Narrativas sobre identidad. Herder Editorial.

Chemero

A. P.

(2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. MIT Press.

Clark

Chalmers

D. J.

(1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7

10.

Dekleva

B. M.

Chowdhury

R. H.

Batista

A. P.

Chase

S. M.

B. M.

Boninger

M. L.

Collinger

J. L.

(2024). Motor cortex retains and reorients neural dynamics during motor imagery. Nature Human Behaviour, 8(4), 729–742. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01804-5

11.

Di Paolo

(2016). Enactivismo. In Vanney

Silva

Franck

(Eds.), Diccionario Interdisciplinar Austral. Universidad Austral. http://dia.austral.edu.ar/Enactivismo

12.

Di Paolo

Cuffari

E. C.

De Jaegher

(2018). Linguistic bodies. The continuity between life and language. The MIT Press. https://lccn.loc.gov/2018001231

13.

El Meridiano. (2024, December 27). XXVI Feria Artesanal del Sombrero Vueltiao en Tuchín. El Meridiano. https://elmeridiano.co/programese-para-la-xxvi-feria-artesanal-del-sombrero-vueltiao-en-tuchin

14.

Fodor

J. A.

(1975). The language of thought. Harvard University Press.

15.

Gallagher

(2005). How the body shapes the mind. Oxford University Press.

16.

García del Castillo

(2009). Aristóteles, De anima III, 3: Primera exploración por el territorio de la imaginación. Azafea, 3(3), 11–32. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2571299&orden=230394&info=link

17.

Gibson

J. J.

(1985). The ecological approach to visual perception - Classic edition. Psychology Press.

18.

Gubenko

Houssemand

(2022). Alternative object use in adults and children: Embodied cognitive bases of creativity. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 893420. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.893420

19.

Heras-Escribano

(2019). The philosophy of affordances. Palgrave Macmillan.

20.

Heras-Escribano

(2021). Pragmatism, enactivism, and ecological psychology: Towards a unified approach to post-cognitivism. Synthese, 198(Suppl 1), 337–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02111-1

21.

Horng

R.-Y.

Wang

C.-W.

Yen

Y.-C.

C.-Y.

C.-T.

(2021). A behavioural measure of imagination based on conceptual combination theory. Creativity Research Journal, 33(4), 376–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2021.1943136

22.

Hutto

D. D.

Myin

(2017). Evolving enactivism. Basic minds meet content. The MIT Press.

23.

Kimmel

Groth

(2023). An “in vivo” analysis of crafts practices and creativity—Why affordances provide a productive lens. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1127684. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1127684

24.

Liao

S.-y.

Gendler

(2020). Imagination. Obtenido de The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/imagination

25.

Loftus

E. F.

(1992). When a lie becomes memory's truth: Memory distortion after exposure to misinformation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(4), 121–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10769035

26.

McClelland

Dunin-Kozicka

(2024). Affording imagination. Philosophical Psychology, 37(7), 1615–1638. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2024.2354433

27.

Monterroza-Rios

A. D.

(2023). Una Concepción Enactiva de Cultura: Enculturación como Acople Dinámico entre Seres Humanos y sus Entornos de Cultura Material. Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology, 27(2), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2023.e85209

28.

Monterroza-Rios

A. D.

Gutierrez-Aguilar

C. M.

(2022). Enactivism and material culture: How enactivism could redefine enculturation processes. Philosophies, 7(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies7040075

29.

Monterroza-Ríos

A. D.

Novikova

(2020). La cultura como andamio de la agencia humana. Pensando - Revista de Filosofia, 11(23), 68–78. https://comunicata.ufpi.br/index.php/pensando/article/view/11057

30.

Mustile

Kourtis

Edwards

M. G.

Donaldson

D. I.

Ietswaart

(2024). Neural correlates of motor imagery and execution in real-world dynamic behavior: evidence for similarities and differences. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 18, 1412307. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2024.1412307

31.

Nanay

(2021, December 21). Mental imagery. Obtenido de The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2021 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/mental-imagery

32.

Newen

De Bruin

Gallager

(2018). The Oxford handbook of 4E cognition. Oxford University Press.

33.

Nichols

(2006). The architecture of the imagination: New essays on pretence, possibility, and fiction. Clarendon Press.

34.

Noë

(2006). Action in perception. The MIT Press.

35.

Ortega

Gasset

(1998). El mito del hombre allende la técnica. Teorema: Revista Internacional de Filosofía, 17(3), 119–124. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43047304

36.

Rietveld

Kiverstein

(2014). A rich landscape of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 26(4), 325–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2014.958035

37.

Rucińska

(2024). Enactive imagination: Its roots and contemporary horizons. In Wellner

Dierckxsens

Arienti

(Eds.), The philosophy of imagination. Technology, art, and ethics (pp. 203–217). Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.

38.

Sassenberg

T. A.

Condon

D. M.

Christensen

A. P.

DeYoung

C. G.

(2023). Imagination as a facet of openness/intellect: A new scale differentiating experiential simulation and conceptual innovation. Creativity Research Journal, 35(4), 583–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2177810

39.

Schacter

D. L.

(2012). Adaptive constructive processes and the future of memory. American Psychologist, 67(8), 603–613. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029869

40.

Shannon

C. E.

Weaver

(1949). The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press.

41.

Soto Calderón

(2022). Imaginación material. ebooks Patagonia-Ediciones Metales Pesados.

42.

Stankozi

(2024). Imagination, ecologized and enacted: driven by the historicity of affordance competition. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 136982. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1369820

43.

Travieso

Gómez-Jordana

Díaz

Lobo

Jacobs

D. M.

(2015). Body-scaled affordances in sensory substitution. Consciousness and Cognition, 38, 130–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.10.009

44.

Trocha

(2020). Sombrero Vueltiao: Transformaciones de un objeto artesanal. Cuadernos Del Centro De Estudios De Diseño Y Comunicación, 87, 165–220. https://doi.org/10.18682/cdc.vi87.3766

45.

Varela

F. J.

Rosch

Thompson

(1991). The embodied mind. Cognitive science and human experience. The MIT Press.

46.

Vygotsky

L. S.

(2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 42(1), 7–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/10610405.2004.11059210

47.

Warren

W. H.

(1984). Perceiving affordances: Visual guidance of stair climbing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(5), 683–703. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.10.5.683

48.

Wikipedia. (2024, May 24). Sombrero vueltiao. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sombrero_vueltiao

Commentary on the Practical and Material Dimension of Imagination

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References