The Dark Tetrad personality traits exhibit socially undesirable behaviors that can often lead to conflict. These negative personality traits might not only cause conflict, but they may play a role in resolving conflict as well. Using established psychology and communication research, this study sought to identify the conflict management styles associated with the Dark Tetrad personality traits. Participants (N = 1120) completed an online survey assessing Dark Tetrad personality traits and conflict management styles. The findings revealed that narcissism and Machiavellianism were positively correlated to every conflict management style (i.e., integrating, avoiding, dominating, obliging, and compromising). As hypothesized, all Dark Tetrad personality traits were positively related to the dominating conflict management style. Controlling for all Dark Tetrad personality traits, narcissism consistently predicted the use of all conflict management styles, suggesting that narcissistic individuals believe that they can navigate conflict in many different ways.
AghababaeiN.Lefdahl-DavisE. M.BłachnioA. (2022). Editorial: Positive and negative psychosocial outcomes of the “dark” personality traits. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 919304. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.919304
2.
AndershedH.GustafsonS. B.KerrM.StattinH. (2002). The usefulness of self-reported psychopathy-like traits in the study of antisocial behaviour among non-referred adolescents. European Journal of Personality, 16(5), 383–402. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.455
3.
AntonioniD. (1998). Relationship between the big five personality factors and Conflict Management Styles. International Journal of Conflict Management, 9(4), 336–355. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022814
4.
BarbutoJ. E.PhippsK. A.XuY. (2010). Testing relationships between personality, conflict styles and effectiveness. International Journal of Conflict Management, 21(4), 434–447. https://doi.org/10.1108/10444061011079967
5.
BaumertA.SchmittM.PeruginiM.JohnsonW.BlumG.BorkenauP.CostantiniG.DenissenJ. J.FleesonW.GraftonB.JayawickremeE.KurziusE.MacLeodC.MillerL. C.ReadS. J.RobertsB.RobinsonM. D.WoodD.WrzusC. (2017). Integrating personality structure, personality process, and personality development. European Journal of Personality, 31(5), 503–528. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2115
6.
BenderD. S. (2012). Mirror, mirror on the wall: Reflecting on narcissism. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68(8), 877–885. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.21892
7.
BergnerM. (2016). A theological and psychological provisional definition of narcissism. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 44(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/009164711604400106
8.
BlakeR.MoutonJ. (1964). The managerial grid: The key to leadership excellence. Gulf Publishing Company.
9.
BookA.VisserB. A.BlaisJ.Hosker-FieldA.Methot-JonesT.GauthierN. Y.VolkA.HoldenR. R.D'AgataM. T. (2016). Unpacking more “evil”: What is at the core of the Dark Tetrad. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 269–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.11.009
10.
BorroniS.SommaA.AndershedH.MaffeiC.FossatiA. (2014). Psychopathy dimensions, big five traits, and dispositional aggression in adolescence: Issues of gender consistency. Personality and Individual Differences, 66, 199–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.019
11.
BussD. M.GomesM.HigginsD. S.LauterbachK. (1987). Tactics of manipulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1219–1229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1219
12.
CollisonK. L.LynamD. R. (2022). Personality traits, personality disorders, and aggression: A comparison of intimate partner violence and non-intimate-partner aggression. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 45(2), 294–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-022-10001-z
13.
FilseckerM.AbsH. J.RoczenN. (2020). The structure of conflict styles in adolescents. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 36(4), 525–536. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000527
FurianL.MarchE. (2023). Trolling, the Dark Tetrad, and the four-facet spectrum of narcissism. Personality and Individual Differences, 208, 112169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112169
16.
FurnhamA.RichardsS. C.PaulhusD. L. (2013). The dark triad of personality: A 10 year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(3), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12018
17.
GaughanE. T.MillerJ. D.PryorL. R.LynamD. R. (2009). Comparing two alternative measures of general personality in the assessment of psychopathy: A test of the NEO PI-R and the MPQ. Journal of Personality, 77(4), 965–996. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00571.x
18.
GoodboyA. K.MartinM. M. (2020). Omega over alpha for reliability estimation of unidimensional communication measures. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44(4), 422–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1846135
19.
GrazianoW. G.Jensen-CampbellL. A.HairE. C. (1996). Perceiving interpersonal conflict and reacting to it: The case for agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 820–835. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.820
HockerJ. L.WilmotW. W. (2018). Interpersonal conflict (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
22.
HoneycuttJ. M.PenceM. E.GearhartC. C. (2013). Associations between imagined interactions and the “big five” personality traits. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 32(3), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.2190/ic.32.3.d
23.
JakobwitzS.EganV. (2006). The dark triad and normal personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(2), 331–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.07.006
24.
Jensen-CampbellL. A.GrazianoW. G.HairE. C. (1996). Personality and relationships as moderators of interpersonal conflict in adolescence. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 42(1), 148–164.
25.
JonasonP. K.WebsterG. D. (2012). A protean approach to social influence: Dark triad personalities and Social Influence Tactics. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(4), 521–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.023
KrumpalI. (2011). Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: A literature review. Quality & Quantity, 47(4), 2025–2047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9640-9
28.
LevineT. R.BeattyM. J.LimonS.HamiltonM. A.BuckR.Chory-AssadR. M. (2004). The dimensionality of the verbal aggressiveness scale. Communication Monographs, 71(3), 245–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/0363452042000299911
29.
LilienfeldS. O.WattsA. L.Francis SmithS.BergJ. M.LatzmanR. D. (2014). Psychopathy deconstructed and reconstructed: Identifying and assembling the personality building blocks of Cleckley's chimera. Journal of Personality, 83(6), 593–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12118
30.
MaleszaM.PolandW. (2020). Grandiose narcissism and vulnerable narcissism in prisoner's dilemma game. Personality and Individual Differences, 158(109841), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020
MonaghanC.BizumicB.SellbomM. (2018). Nomological network of two-dimensional machiavellianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 130(3c), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.047
33.
MyersI. B. (1962). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Manual (1962). Consulting Psychologists Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/14404-000
34.
OetzelJ. G. (1998). The effects of self-construals and ethnicity on self-reported conflict styles. Communication Reports, 11(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934219809367695
PajevicM.Vukosavljevic-GvozdenT.StevanovicN.NeumannC. S. (2018). The relationship between the dark tetrad and a two-dimensional view of empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 123, 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.11.009
37.
PaulhusD. L.BuckelsE. E.TrapnellP. D.JonesD. N. (2021). Screening for dark personalities. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 37(3), 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000602
38.
PerryJ. D.PerryJ. C. (2004). Conflicts, defenses and the stability of narcissistic personality features. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 67(4), 310–330. https://doi.org/10.1521/psyc.67.4.310.56570
39.
RahimM. A. (1983). A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 368–376. https://doi.org/10.5465/255985
40.
RahimM. A.MagnerN. R. (1995). Confirmatory factor analysis of the styles of handling interpersonal conflict: First-order factor model and its invariance across groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(1), 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.1.122
41.
RogozaR.CieciuchJ. (2018). Dark triad traits and their structure: An empirical approach. Current Psychology, 39(4), 1287–1302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9834-6
42.
SheldonP.RauschnabelP.HoneycuttJ. M. (2019). The Dark Side of Social Media: Psychological, Managerial, and Societal Perspectives. Elsevier Science.
43.
SherryA.HensonR. K. (2005). Conducting and interpreting canonical correlation analysis in personality research: A user-friendly primer. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8401_09
44.
SternbergR. J.SorianoL. J. (1984). Styles of conflict resolution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(1), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.1.115
45.
TafoyaM. A.HamiltonM. A. (2011). Relational dynamics and the expression of aggression and comforting between siblings. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31(1), 49–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927(11425035
