The present study tests the idea that individuals high on both trait Openness-to-Experience and fluid intelligence can suffer from an overactive mental state that depletes cognitive capability and leads to restless and impulsive behavior. In all, 118 participants (58 females, 59 males) were tested using the multidimensional assessment of fluid intelligence (GIA), an Open-to-Experience trait measure (HEXACO), and Levenson's secondary psychopathy questionnaire. Although analysis of variance (ANOVA) analyses revealed no interaction between Openness and fluid intelligence, an examination of the lower-order items of Openness and GIA revealed significant interactions in the female sample, particularly with esthetic appreciation. The results also suggest Openness as a unique predictor of secondary psychopathy, however the same does not hold true for fluid intelligence. The findings are discussed in relation to personnel selection procedures. Key considerations for attention capacity and activation theory are proposed. Sample size limitations are acknowledged.
AndersonN.PotočnikK.ZhouJ. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the- science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40, 1297–1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128
2.
AshtonM. C.LeeK.VernonP. A.JangK. L. (2000). Fluid intelligence, crystallized intelligence, and the openness/intellect factor. Journal of Research in Personality, 34(2), 198–207.
3.
BernerthJ. B.AguinisH. (2016). A critical review and best-practice recommendations for control variable usage. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 229–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12103
4.
Boxer, O., & Duran, R. E. F. (2009). The Relations among Creativity, Schizotypy, Intellectual Functioning, and Latent Inhibition in Healthy Adults [ProQuest Dissertations and Theses].
5.
CarsonS. H.HigginsD. M.PetersonJ. B. (2003). Decreased latent inhibition is associated with increased creative achievement in high-functioning individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 499–506.
6.
CattellR. B. (1987). Intelligence: Its structure, growth and action (Vol. 35). Elsevier.
7.
CupchikG. C.VartanianO.CrawleyA.MikulisD. J. (2009). Viewing artworks: Contributions of cognitive control and perceptual facilitation to aesthetic experience. Brain and Cognition, 70(1), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2009.01.003
8.
DannP. (2015). The general intelligence assessment (GIA) technical manual. Thomas International Limited.
9.
DeLisiM.VaughnM. G.BeaverK. M.WrightJ. P. (2010). The hannibal lecter myth: Psychopathy and verbal intelligence in the macarthur violence risk assessment study. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 32(2), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-009-9147-z
10.
DilchertS.OnesD.DavisR.RostowC. (2007). Cognitive ability predicts objectively measured counterproductive work behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 616–627.
11.
Dollinger, S., Urban, K., & James, T. (2004). Creativity and openness: Further validation of two creative product measures. Creativity Research Journal, 16(1), 35–47.
12.
ErdheimJ.WangM.ZickarM. J. (2006). Linking the Big Five personality constructs to organizational commitment. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(5), 959–970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.04.005
13.
EysenckM. (1977). Human memory: Theory, research, and individual differences (Vol. 22). Pergamon.
14.
FalkenbachD. M. (2008). Psychopathy and the assessment of violence in women. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 8(2), 212–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228930801964125
15.
FinkA.Slamar-HalbedM.UnterrainerH. F.WeissE. M. (2012). Creativity: Genius, madness, or a combination of both. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024874
16.
Fogarty, G., & Stankov, L. (1982). Competing tasks as an index of intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 3(4), 407–422.
GeorgeJ.ZhouJ. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behaviour: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 513–524.
20.
GrayN. S.FernandezM.WilliamsJ.RuddleR. A.SnowdenR. J. (2002). Which schizotypal dimensions abolish latent inhibition. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41, 271–284.
21.
HarpurT. J.HareR. D.HakstianA. R. (1989). Two-factor conceptualization of psychopathy: Construct validity and assessment implications. Psychological Assessment, 1, 6–17.
22.
HeitzR.UnsworthN.EngleR. (2005). Working memory capacity, attention control, and fluid intelligence. In WilhelmO.EngleR. W. (Eds.), Handbook of understanding and measuring intelligence (pp. 61–78). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
23.
KahnemanD. (1973). Attention and effort. Prentice-Hall.
24.
KeiserRoss. (2011). Carver and Whites’ BIS/FFFS/BAS scales and domains and facets of the five factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(1), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.007
25.
KennealyP. J.HicksB. M.PatrickC. J. (2007). Validity of factors of the psychopathy checklist-revised in female prisoners: Discriminant relations with antisocial behavior, substance abuse, and personality. Assessment, 14(4), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191107305882
26.
KuncelN. R.HezlettS. A.OnesD. S. (2004). Academic performance, career potential, creativity and job performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 148–161.
27.
LanderLutz-ZoisRyeGoodnight. (2011). The differential association between alexithymia and primary versus secondary psychopathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(1), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.08.027
28.
LeeK.AshtonM. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 3171(906465110). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3902
29.
LeeZ.SalekinR. T. (2010). Psychopathy in a noninstitutional sample: Differences in primary and secondary subtypes. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 1(3), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019269
30.
LevensonM. R.KiehlK. A.FitzpatrickC. M. (1995). Assessing Psychopathic Attributes in a Noninstitutionalized Population. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(1), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.1.151
31.
MaltarichM. A.NybergA. J.ReillyG. (2010). A conceptual and empirical analysis of the cognitive ability-voluntary turnover relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1058–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020331
32.
McDanielM. A.BanksG. C. (2010). General cognitive ability. Handbook of Workplace Assessment, 32, 61.
33.
NisbettR. E.AronsonJ.BlairC.DickensW.FlynnJ.HalpernD. F.TurkheimerE. (2012). Intelligence: New findings and theoretical developments. American Psychologist, 67(2), 130–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026699
34.
Peterson, J. B., & Carson, S. (2000). Latent inhibition and openness to experience in a highachieving student population. Personality and Individual Differences, 28(2), 323–332.
35.
Paulhus, D., & Williams, K. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98446-9_43
PoythressN. G.HallJ. R. (2011). Psychopathy and impulsivity reconsidered. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(2), 120–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2011.02.003
RossS. R.LutzC. J.BailleyS. E. (2004). Psychopathy and the five factor model in a noninstitutionalized sample: A domain and facet level analysis. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26, 213–223.
40.
SimontonD. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why?Guilford Press.
41.
WuJ.LeBretonJ. M. (2011). Reconsidering the dispositional basis of counterproductive work behavior: The role of aberrant personality. Personnel Psychology, 64, 593–626. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01220.x
42.
ZhangX.BartolK. M. (2010). The influence of creative process engagement on employee creative performance and overall job performance: A curvilinear assessment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 862–873. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020173
