An Exploratory Factor Analysis on the Boundary Questionnaire 18: Insights for Future Research

Abstract

The current study examines some Boundary Questionnaire 18 (BQ18) psychometric properties, a shorter version of the Boundary Questionnaire (BQ). The current study examines the BQ18 through factor analysis to understand more about the structure of the inventory. At this point, the BQ18 has not been examined in depth. Further, the authors suggest a shorter version of the BQ18 termed "BQ13" with stronger reliability. The current study also examines the utilization of the "BQ13" as a unidimensional scale. The authors discuss the positive outcomes of having a new scale to measure mental boundaries that are more up-to-date and can be utilized not only in research settings but clinical settings as well.

Keywords

Mental Boundaries factor analysis psychometrics counseling future research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aumann

Lahl

Pietrowsky

(2012). Relationship between dream structure, boundary structure and the Big Five personality dimensions. Dreaming, 22(2), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028977

Costello

A. B.

Osborne

(2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868

Federn

(1953). Ego psychology and the psychoses. Imago.

Fisher

Cleveland

S. E.

(1968). Body image and personality. Dover Publ.

Harrison

R. H.

Hartmann

Bevis

(2006). The Boundary Questionnaire: Its preliminary reliability and validity. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 25(4), 355–382. https://doi.org/10.2190/8120-6340-T808-7001

Hartmann

(1991). Boundaries in the mind: A new psychology of personality. Basic Books.

Hartmann

(1997). The concept of boundaries in counselling and psychotherapy. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 25(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069889708253798

Hartmann

Rosen

Rand

(1998). Personality and dreaming: Boundary structure and dream content. Dreaming, 8(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:drem.0000005913.21794.1f

Kunzendorf

R. G.

Hartmann

Cohen

Cutler

(1997). Bizarreness of the dreams and daydreams reported by individuals with thin and thick boundaries. Dreaming, 7(4), 265–271. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0094482

10.

Landis

(1970). Ego boundaries. Psychological Issues, 6(4), 1–172.

11.

Mccrae

R. R.

(1994). Openness to experience: Expanding the boundaries of factor V. European Journal of Personality, 8(4), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410080404

12.

Rawlings

(2001). An exploratory factor analysis of Hartmann's Boundary Questionnaire and an empirically-derived short version. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 21(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.2190/3XM9-LGA6-MJ76-X658

13.

Tabachnick

B. G.

Fidell

L. S.

Ullman

J. B.

(2019). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson.

14.

Watson

Clark

L. A.

Tellegen

(1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063