This study explores the relationship between public speaking anxiety (PSA) and Imaginary Interactions (IIs). Participants (N = 17) were recruited from the multi-section departmental introductory public speaking course. Virtual reality (VR) as a potential form of II treatment for PSA blurs the reality between imagined and actual interactions. This study utilized a sequential explanatory approach to examine inferential and descriptive findings. The inferential investigation employed a four-stage design requiring participants to complete pre-test PSA and post-test assessments before and after VR simulations, exploring II functions and attributions. The follow-up descriptive analysis expanded and generated new understanding for the complexities of II through participants’ experiences using directed content analysis. Utilizing VR as an extension of IIs highlighted the rehearsal function, and variations in attributions for discrepancy and specificity between VR realism and artificial simulated perceptions. The implications suggest that VR provides students in public speaking environments a treatment mechanism that minimizes the cognitive strain to imagine the scene and setting of the situation, while simultaneously providing assistance in PSA reduction.
Alsina-Jurnet, I., Gutierrez-Maldonado, J., & Rangel-Gomez, M. (2011). The role of presence in the level of anxiety experienced in clinical virtual environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 504–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.09.018
2.
AllenM.BerkowitzS.HuntS.LoudenA. (1999).
A meta-analysis of the impact of forensics and communication education on critical thinking. Communication Education,
48(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529909379149
3.
AllenM.BourhisJ. (1996).
The relationship of communication apprehension to communication behavior: A meta-analysis. Communication Quarterly,
44(2), 214–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379609370011
4.
AllenM.HunterJ. E.DonohueW. A. (1989).
Meta-analysis of self-report data on the effectiveness of public speaking anxiety treatment techniques. Communication Education,
38(1), 54–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528909378740
5.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental health disorders (5th ed.).
6.
Anderson, P. L., Price, M., Edwards, S. M., Obasaju, M. A., Schmertz, S. K., Zimand, E., & Calamaras, M. R. (2013). Virtual reality exposure therapy for social anxiety disorder: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81(5), 751–760. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033559
7.
Anderson, P. L., Zimand, E., Hodges, L. F., & Rothbaum, B. O. (2005). Cognitive behavioral therapy for public-speaking anxiety using virtual reality for exposure. Depression and Anxiety, 22(3), 156–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20090
AyersJ. (1992).
An examination of the impact of anticipated communication and communication apprehension on negative thinking, task relevant thinking, and recall. Communication Research Reports,
9(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824099209359892
10.
AyersJ.AyersF. E.BakerA. L.ColbyN.De BlasiC.DimkeD.DockenL.GrubbJ.HopfT.MuellerR. D.SharpD.Kathleen WilcoxA. (1993).
Two empirical tests of a videotape designed to reduce public speaking anxiety. Journal of Applied Communication Research,
21(2), 132–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909889309365362
11.
Aymerich-French, L., Kizilcec, R. F., & Bailenson, J. N. (2014). The relationship between virtual self similarity and social anxiety. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 19, 944. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00944
12.
BeebeS. A. (2013, May).
Our “front porch.” Spectra,
49(2), 3–22.
13.
BehnkeR. R.SawyerC. R. (1999).
Milestones of anticipatory public speaking anxiety. Communication Education,
48(2), 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529909379164
14.
BensonH.KlipperM. Z. (2000). The relaxation response. HarperCollins.
15.
BerkosK. M. (2010). The role of imagined interactions in online communication. In HoneycuttJ. M. (Ed.), Imagine that: Studies in imagined interaction (pp. 115–125).
Hampton.
16.
BioccoF.DelaneyB. (1995). Immersive virtual reality technology. In BioccoF.LevyM. R. (Eds.), Communication in the age of virtual reality (pp. 57–124).
Erlbaum.
17.
BioccoF.LevyM. R. (1995a). Virtual reality as a communication system. In BioccoF.LevyM. R. (Eds.), Communication in the age of virtual reality (pp. 15–32).
Erlbaum.
18.
BioccoF.LevyM. R. (1995b). Communication applications of virtual reality. In BioccoF.LevyM. R. (Eds.), Communication in the age of virtual reality (pp. 127–157).
Erlbaum.
19.
BodieG. D. (2010).
A racing heart, rattling knees, and ruminative thoughts: Defining, explaining, and treating public speaking anxiety. Communication Education,
59(1), 70–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520903443849
20.
BodieG. D.HoneycuttJ. M.VickeryA. J. (2013).
An analysis of the correspondence between imagined interaction attributes and functions. Human Communication Research,
39(2), 157–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12003
21.
BourhisJ.AllenM. (1992).
Meta-analysis of the relationship between communication apprehension and cognitive performance. Communication Education,
41(1), 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529209378871
22.
BourhisJ.AllenM. (1992).
The role of videotaped feedback in the instruction of public speaking: A quantitative synthesis of published empirical research. Communication Research Reports,
15(3), 256–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824099809362121
23.
ChoiC. W.HoneycuttJ. M.BodieG. D. (2015).
Effects of imagined interactions and rehearsal on speaking performance. Communication Education,
64(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2014.978795
24.
ClevengerT. (1984). Analysis of research on social anxieties. In DalyJ. A.McCroskeyJ. C.(Eds.), Avoiding communication: Shyness, reticence, and communication apprehension (1st ed., pp. 219–236).
Sage.
25.
DalyJ. A.McCroskeyJ. C.AyersJ.HopfT.AyersD. M. (1997). Avoiding communication: Shyness, reticence, and communication apprehension (2nd ed.).
Hampton Press.
26.
DavisA.LinvillD. L.HodgesL. F.Da CostaA. F.LeeA. (2020).
Virtual reality versus face-to-face practice: A study into situational apprehension and performance. Communication Education,
69(1), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2019.1684535
DwyerK. K. (2000).
The multidimensional model: Teaching students to self-manage high communication apprehension by self-selecting treatments. Communication Education,
49(1), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520009379194
29.
EdwardsR.HoneycuttJ. M.ZagackiK. S. (1988).
Imagined interactions as an element of social cognition. Western Journal of Communication,
52(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570318809389623
30.
EdwardsR.HoneycuttJ. M.ZagackiK. S. (1989).
Gender differences in imagined interactions. Sex Roles,
21, 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289906
31.
FaravelliC.ZucchiT.VivianiB.SalmoriaR.PeroneA.PaionniA.ScarpatoA.VigliaturoD.RosiS.D’adamoD.BartolozziD.CecchiC.AbrardiL. (2000).
Epidemiology of social phobia: A clinical approach. European Psychiatry,
15(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-9338(00)00215-7
FoxJ.ArenaD.BailensonJ. N. (2009).
Virtual reality: A survival guide for the social scientist. Journal of Media Psychology,
21(3), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105.21.3.95
34.
FrisbyB. N.KaufmannR.ValladeJ. I.FreyT. K.MartinJ. C. (2020).
Using virtual reality for speech rehearsals: An innovative instructor approach to enhance student public speaking efficacy.Basic Communication Course Annual,
32, 59–78. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1587&context=bcca
35.
GarauM.SlaterM.PertaubD. P.RazzaqueS. (2005).
The responses of people to virtual humans in an immersive virtual environment. PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments,
14(1), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1162/1054746053890242
GreeneJ. O.SparksG. G. (1983a).
Explication and test of a cognitive model of communication apprehension: A new look at an old construct. Human Communication Research,
9(4), 349–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1983.tb00704.x
38.
GreeneJ. O.SparksG. G. (1983b).
The role of outcome expectations in the experience of a state of communication apprehension. Communication Quarterly,
31(3), 212–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463378309369506
39.
Harris, S. R., Kemmerling, R. L., & North, M. M. (2002). Brief virtual reality therapy for public speaking anxiety. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 5(6), 543–550. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493102321018187
40.
HoneycuttJ. M. (1995). Imagined interactions, recurrent conflict and thought about personal relationships: A memory structure approach. In AitkenJ. E.SchedletskyL. J.(Eds.), Intrapersonal communication processes (pp. 138–150).
Midnight Oil Multimedia.
41.
HoneycuttJ. M. (1999).
Typological differences in predicting marital happiness from oral history behaviors and imagined interactions. Communication Monographs,
66(3), 276–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759909376478
42.
HoneycuttJ. M. (2003). Imagined interactions.
Hampton Press.
43.
HoneycuttJ. M. (2004).
Imagined interaction conflict-linkage theory: Explaining the persistence and resolution of interpersonal conflict in everyday life.Imagination, Cognition, and Personality,
23(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.2190/240J-1VPK-K86D-1JL8
44.
HoneycuttJ. M. (2008). Imagined interaction theory: Mental representations of interpersonal communication. In BaxterL. A.BraithwaiteD. O. (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 77–87).
Sage.
45.
HoneycuttJ. M. (2010). Imagine that: Studies in imagined interaction.
Hampton.
46.
HoneycuttJ. M. (2015). Imagined interaction theory: Mental representation of interpersonal communication. In BraithwaiteD. O.SchrodtP.(Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 75–88).
Sage.
47.
HoneycuttJ. M.ChoiC.W.DeBerryJ. R. (2009).
Communication apprehension and imagined interactions. Communication Research Reports,
26(3), 228–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090903074423
48.
HoneycuttJ. M.EdwardsR.ZagackiK. S. (1989–1990).
Using Imagined Interaction features to predict measures of self-awareness: Loneliness, locus of control, self-dominance, and emotional intensity. Imagination, Cognition and Personality,
9(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.2190/02 L8
49.
HoneycuttJ. M.FordS. G. (2001). Mental imagery and intrapersonal communication: A review of research on imagined interactions (IIs) and current developments. In GudykunstW. B. (Ed.), Communication yearbook 25 (pp. 315–345).
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
50.
HoneycuttJ. M.GotcherJ. M. (1991). Influence of imagined interactions on communicative outcomes: The case of forensic competition. In KunzendorfR.(Ed.), Mental imagery (pp. 139–143).
Plenum.
51.
Honeycutt, J. M., Zagacki, K. S., Edwards, R. (1989). Intrapersonal communication, social cognition, and imagined interactions. In C. V. Roberts & K. W. Watson (Eds.), Intrapersonal communication processes (pp. 166–184). Gorsuch Scariskbrick.
52.
HoneycuttJ. M.ZagackiK. S.EdwardsR. (1992–1993).
Imagined interaction, conversational sensitivity, and communication competence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality,
12(2), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.2190/B9PC-5IRJ-1D7N-4M94
53.
HopfT.AyersJ. (1992).
Coping with public speaking anxiety: An examination of various combinations of systematic desensitization, skills training, and visualization. Journal of Applied Communication Research,
20(2), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909889209365328
54.
HsiehH-F.ShannonS. E. (2005).
Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.Qualitative Health Research,
15, 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
55.
LeFebvreL. (2017). Basic course in communication. In AllenM. (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of communication research methods (pp. 87–90).
Sage.
56.
LeFebvreL.LeFebvreL. E. (2019).
The introductory communication course from 1956 to 2016: A meta-synthesis. Communication Education,
69(2), 199–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2019.1679380
57.
LeFebvreL.LeFebvreL. E.AllenM. (2018).
Training the butterflies to fly in formation: Cataloguing student fears about public speaking. Communication Education,
67(3), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2018.1468915
58.
LeFebvreL.LeFebvreL. E.AllenM.BucknerM. M.GriffinD. (2019).
Metamorphosis of public speaking anxiety: Student fear transformation throughout the introductory communication course. Communication Studies,
71(1), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2019.1661867
59.
LeFebvreL. E.CarmackH. J.PedersonJ. R. (2020).
“It’s only one negative comment”: Women instructors’ perceptions of (un)helpful support messages following hurtful course evaluations. Communication Education,
69(1), 19–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2019.1672879
LucasS. E. (1999). Teaching public speaking. In VangelistiA. L.DalyJ. A.FriedrichG. W. (Eds.), Teaching communication: Theory research, and methods (2nd ed., pp. 75–84).
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
McCroskeyJ. C. (1984). The communication apprehension perspective. In DalyJ. A.McCroskeyJ. C.(Eds.), Avoiding communication: Shyness, reticence, and communication apprehension (pp. 13–38).
Sage.
66.
McCroskeyJ. C.BeattyM. J. (1984).
Communication apprehension and accumulated communication state anxiety experiences: A research note. Communication Monographs,
51(1), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758409390185
67.
McCroskeyL. L.TevenJ. J.MinielliM. C.Richmond McCroskeyV. P. (2014).
James C. McCroskey’s instructional communication legacy: Collaborations, mentorships, teachers, and students. Communication Education,
63(4), 283–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2014.911929
68.
MeyerJ. R. (1997). Cognitive influences on the ability to address interaction goals. In GreeneJ. O. (Ed.), Message production: Advances in communication theory (pp. 71–90).
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
69.
Morina, N., Brinkman, W., Hartanto, D., & Emmelkamp, P. M. G. (2014). Sense of presence and anxiety during virtual social interactions between a human and virtual humans. PeerJ Computer Science, 2, e337. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.337
70.
MorrealeS. P.MyersS. A.BacklundP. M.SimondsC. J. (2016).
Study IX of the basic communication course at two- and four-year U.S. colleges and universities: A re-examination of our discipline’s “front porch.” Communication Education,
65(3), 338–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2015.1073339
71.
MorrealeS. P.PearsonJ. C. (2008).
Why communication education is important: The centrality of the discipline in the 21st century. Communication Education,
57(2), 224–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520701861713
72.
MorrealeS. P.WorleyD. W.HugenbergB. (2010).
The basic communication course at two- and four-Year U.S. colleges and universities: Study VIII—The 40th Anniversary. Communication Education,
59(4), 405–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520701861713
OwensM. E.BeidelD. C. (2015).
Can virtual reality effectively elicit distress associated with social anxiety disorder?Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment,
37(2), 296–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-014-9454-x
77.
PattonM. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.).Sage.
78.
PaulG. L. (1966). Insight vs. desensitization in psychotherapy: An experiment in anxiety reduction.
Stanford University Press.
79.
Price, M., & Anderson, P. L. (2012). Outcome expectancy as a predictor of treatment response in cognitive behavioral therapy for public speaking fears within social anxiety disorder. Psychotherapy, 49(2), 173–179. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024734
80.
RichmondV. P.WrenchJ. S.McCroskeyJ. C. (2013). Communication apprehension, avoidance, and effectiveness (6th ed.).
Pearson.
RuscellaJ. J. (2019, October 18). Virtual reality and job interviews. Academic Minute. https://academicminute.org
83.
SawyerC. R.BehnkeR. R. (1997).
Communication apprehension and implicit memories of public speaking state anxiety. Communication Quarterly,
45(3), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379709370061
84.
SchlenkerB. R.LearyM. R. (1982).
Social anxiety and self-presentation: A conceptualization and model.Psychological Bulletin,
92, 641–669. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.92.3.641
85.
SheldonP.GreyS. H.VickeryA. J.HoneycuttJ. M. (2015).
An analysis of imagined interactions with Pro-Ana (Anorexia): Implications for mental and physical health.Imagination, Cognition and Personality: Consciousness in Theory, Research, and Clinical Practice,
35(2), 166–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276236615587493
86.
SlaterM.AntleyA.DavisonA.SwappD.GugerC.BarkerC.PastrangN.Sanchez-VivesM. V. (2006).
A virtual reprise of the Stanley Milgram obedience experiments.PLoS One,
1(1), e39. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000039
87.
Student Loan Hero. (2017). Ready to payoff your student loans? We thought so. Student Loan Hero, Inc. https://studentloanhero.com
88.
Stupar-RutenfransS.KetelaarsL. E. H.van GisbergenM. S. (2017).
Beat the fear of public speaking: Mobile 360 video virtual reality exposure training in home environment reduces public speaking anxiety.Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking,
20(10), 624–633. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0174
89.
TeddlieC.TashakkoriA. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences.
Sage.
90.
TracyS. J. (2010).
Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry,
16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
91.
Van KelegomM. J.WrightC. (2013).
The use of imagined interactions to manage relational uncertainty. Southern Communication Journal,
78(2), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2012.726688
92.
VickeryA. (2019).
Everyday (imagined) talk: An exploration of everyday conversational topics and imagined interaction features.Imagination, Cognition and Personality: Consciousness in Theory, Research, and Clinical Practice,
39(2), 175–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276236618809670
93.
Wallach, H. S., Safir, M. P., & Bar-Zvi, M. (2009). Virtual reality cognitive behavior therapy for public speaking anxiety: A randomized clinical trial. Behavior Modification, 33(3), 314–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445509331926
94.
WhitworthR. H.CochranC. (1996).
Evaluation of integrated versus unitary treatments for reducing public speaking anxiety. Communication Education,
45(4), 306–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529609379060
95.
WiederholdB. K.RivaG. (2019).
Virtual reality therapy: Emerging topics and future challenges.Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking,
22(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.29136.bkw
96.
ZagackiK. S.EdwardsR.HoneycuttJ. M. (1992).
The role of mental imagery and emotion in Imagined Interactions. Communication Quarterly,
40(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379209369820
