Imagined Interactions and Inner Speech

Abstract

Similarities and differences between inner speech and imagined interactions (IIs) are discussed. Selected studies in both areas are reviewed. Inner speech originally was conceptualized as a stage in language acquisition and the process of thought. It reflects speaking to oneself in the form of monologue. It has been referred to as verbal thinking, inner speaking, covert self-talk, internal monologue, and internal dialogue as people talk to themselves in silence. IIs are similar, yet different in that imaginary dialogue reflects talking to another person while monologue is self-talk. IIs are a type of daydreaming, social cognition, and mental imagery in which people experience cognitive representations of conversation with accompanying verbal and nonverbal features. We highlight relevant studies in the areas of daydreaming, public speaking, rumination, cardiovascular arousal, and road rage. We conclude with two suggestions for future research.

Keywords

imagined interactions inner speech daydreaming self-talk self-monologue

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alderson-Day

Fernyhough

(2015). Inner speech: Development, cognitive functions, phenomenology, and neurobiology. Psychological Bulletin, 141(5), 931–965. doi:10.1037/bul0000021

Alderson-Day

McCarthy-Jones

Bedford

Collins

Dunne

Rooke

Fernyhough

(2014). Shot through with voices: Dissociation mediates the relationship between varieties of inner speech and auditory hallucination proneness. Consciousness and Cognition, 27, 288–296.

Baddeley

(2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417–423. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2

Brinthaupt

T. M.

Hein

M. B.

Kramer

T. E.

(2009). The self-talk scale: Development, factor analysis, and validation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 82–92. doi:10.1080/00223890802484498

Choi

C. E.

Honeycutt

J. M.

Bodie

G. D.

(2015). Effects of imagined interactions and rehearsal on speaking performance. Communication Education, 64, 25–44. doi:10.1080/03634523.2014.978795

Cronen

Johnson

Lannaman

Pearce

W. B.

(1982). Paradoxes, double binds, and reflexive loops: A comparison of two theoretical perspectives and a suggested methodology. Family Process, 21, 91–112. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1982.00091.x

Eldredge

J. H.

Honeycutt

J. M.

White

R. C.

Standige

(2016). On the functions of imagined interactions in night dreams. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 35, 244–257. doi:10.1177/0276236615595231

Fernyhough

(2004). Alien voices and inner dialogue: Towards a developmental account of auditory verbal hallucinations. New Ideas in Psychology, 22(1), 49–68.

Hample

Richards

A. S.

(2012). A test of the conflict linkage model in the context of serial arguments. Western Journal of Communication, 76, 459–479. doi:10.1080/10570314.2012.703361

10.

Honeycutt

J. M.

(2003). Imagined interactions: Daydreaming about communication. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.

11.

Honeycutt

J. M.

(2010). Imagine that: Studies in imagined interaction. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.

12.

Honeycutt

J. M.

(2015). Imagined interaction theory: Mental representations of interpersonal communication. In Braithwaite

D. O.

Schrodt

(Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication (2nd ed., pp. 75–87). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

13.

Honeycutt

J. M.

(2018). Communicating with families through imagined interactions. In Honeycutt

J. M.

(Ed.), Communication diversity in families (pp. 86–106). San Diego, CA: Cognella.

14.

Honeycutt

J. M.

(2019). Promoting mental health through imagery and imagined interactions. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

15.

Honeycutt

J. M.

Choi

C. W.

Deberry

R. D.

(2009). Communication apprehension and imagined interactions. Communication Research Reports, 26, 228–236. doi:10.1080/08824090903074423

16.

Honeycutt

J. M.

Keaton

S. A.

Hatcher

L. C.

Hample

(2014). Effects of rumination and observing marital conflict on observers’ heart rates as they advise and predict the use of conflict tactics. In Honeycutt

J. M.

Sawyer

C. R.

Keaton

S. A.

(Eds.), The influence of communication on physiology and health (pp. 73–92). New York, NY: Peter Lang.

17.

Honeycutt

J. M.

Sheldon

P. A.

(2018). Scripts and communication for relationships (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Peter Lang.

18.

Honeycutt

J. M.

Vickery

A. J.

Hatcher

L. C.

(2015). The daily use of imagined interaction features. Communication Monographs, 82(2), 201–223. doi:10.1080/03637751.2014.953965

19.

Johnson, K. L., & Roloff, M. E. (1998). Serial arguing and relational quality: Determinants and consequences of perceived resolvability. Communication Research, 25, 327–343. doi:10.1177/009365098025003004

20.

Klinger

(1990). Daydreaming: Using waking fantasy and imagery for self-knowledge and creativity. Los Angeles, CA: Jeremy Tarcher.

21.

Klinger

(2009). Daydreaming and fantasizing: Thought flow and motivation. In Markman

K. D.

Klein

W. M. P.

Suhr

J. A.

(Eds.), Handbook of imagination and mental simulation (pp. 225–239). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

22.

Klinger

(2013). Goal commitments and the content of thoughts and dreams: Basic principles. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–17. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00415

23.

Malis, R. S., & Roloff, M. E. (2006). Demand/withdraw patterns in serial arguments: Implications for well-being. Human Communication Research, 32, 198–216. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00009.x

24.

McCarthy-Jones

Fernyhough

(2011). The varieties of inner speech: Links between quality of inner speech and psychopathological variables in a sample of young adults. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 1586–1593.

25.

McLeod

S. A.

(2018, August 5). Lev Vygotsky. Retrieved from https://www.simplypsychology.org/vygotsky.html

26.

Morin

Duhnych

Racy

(2018). Self-reported inner speech use in university students. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32, 376–382. doi:10.1002/acp.3404

27.

Morin

Uttl

(2013). Inner speech: A window into consciousness. The Neuropsychotherapist. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240024225_Inner_speech_A_window_into_consciousness

28.

Piaget

(1959). The language and thought of the child (Vol. 5). London, England: Psychology Press.

29.

Ren

Wang

Jarrold

(2016). Individual differences in frequency of inner speech: Differential relations with cognitive and non-cognitive factors. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1675. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01675

30.

Roloff, M. E., & Reznik, R. M. (2008). Communication during serial arguments: Connections with individuals' mental and physical well-being. In M. T. Motley (Ed.), Studies in applied interpersonal communication (pp. 97–120). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

31.

Shi

Brinthaupt

McCree

(2017). Understanding the influence of self-critical, self-managing, and social-assessing self-talk on performance outcomes in a public speaking context. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 36(4), 356–378. doi:10.1177/0276236617708740

32.

Uttl

Morin

Hamper

(2011). Are inner speech self-report questionnaires reliable and valid? Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 1719–1723. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.332

33.

Vygotsky

L. S.

(1987). Thinking and speech. In Rieber

R. W.

Carton

A. S.

(Eds.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky, Volume 1: Problems of general psychology (pp. 39–285). New York, NY: Plenum Press. (Original work published 1934)

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.16 MB