Imagined interactions (IIs) occur when individuals recall past conversations with others as well as anticipate future ones. IIs intersect with the concept of inner speech, yet little is known about what elements IIs and inner speech share as well as how they differ. Information is offered about both Imagined Interaction Theory and inner speech, followed by a discussion pertaining to how they interact with other inner experiences. Results based on self-reported inner speech using a Thought Listing procedure are also presented. Two main conclusions are reached: (a) IIs constitute mental activities that do include one type of inner speech but which recruit additional components absent in the latter. (b) Inner speech includes IIs, but also encompasses many other topics and functions not present in, or served by, IIs. Consequently, inner speech and IIs ought not to be equated.
Alderson-DayB.MitrengaK.WilkinsonS.McCarthy-JonesS.FernyhoughC. (2018).
The varieties of inner speech questionnaire—Revised (VISQ-R): Replicating and refining links between inner speech and psychopathology. Consciousness and Cognition,
65, 48–58. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2018.07.001
3.
ArnettD. C. (2016). Dialogue theory. In JensenK. B.CraigR. T.PooleyJ. D.RothenbuhlerE. W. (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of communication theory and philosophy, 4 volume set.
Oxford, England:
Wiley Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781118766804.wbiect008
4.
BodieG. D.HoneycuttJ. M.VickeryA. J. (2013).
An analysis of the correspondence between imagined interaction attributes and functions. Human Communication Research,
39, 157–183. doi:10.1111/hcre.12003
5.
BolenD. (2012). Cognitive script theory. In KosutM. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of gender in media.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
SAGE. doi:10.4135/9781452218540.n16
6.
BrinthauptT. M.BensonS. A.KangM.MooreZ. D. (2015).
Assessing the accuracy of self-reported self-talk. Frontiers in Psychology,
6, 570. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00570
7.
BrinthauptT. M.HeinM. B.KramerT. E. (2009).
The self-talk scale: Development, factor analysis, and validation. Journal of Personality Assessment,
91, 82–92.
8.
De GuerreroM. C. M. (2005). Methodology of research on inner speech. In: GuerreroM. C. M. De (Ed.), Inner speech—L2: Thinking words in a second language (Chapter 2, pp. 89–118).
New York, NY:
Springer.
9.
DuncanR. M.CheyneJ. A. (1999).
Incidence and functions of self-reported private speech in young adults: A self-verbalization questionnaire. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences du Comportement,
31, 133–136. doi:10.1037/h0087081
10.
DuncanR.TarulliD. (2009). On the persistence of private speech: Empirical and theoretical considerations. In WinslerA.FernyhoughC.MonteroI. (Eds.), Private speech, executive functioning, and the development of verbal self-regulation (pp. 176–187).
New York, NY:
Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511581533.015
11.
FernyhoughC.MeinsE. (2009). Private speech and theory of mind: Evidence for developing interfunctional relations. In WinslerA.FernyhoughC.MonteroI. (Eds.), Private speech, executive functioning, and the development of verbal self-regulation (pp. 95–104).
Cambridge, England:
Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511581533.008
12.
GillihanS.FarahM. J. (2005).
Is self-related processing special? A critical review. Psychological Bulletin,
131, 76–97.
13.
HeaveyC. L.HurlburtR. T. (2008).
The phenomena of inner experience. Consciousness and Cognition,
17(3), 798–810.
14.
HermansH. J. M. (1996).
Voicing the self: From information processing to dialogical interchange. Psychological Bulletin,
119, 31–50.
15.
HoneycuttJ. M. (2010a). Dialogue theory and imagined interactions. In HoneycuttJ. M. (Ed.), Imagine that: Studies in imagined interaction (pp. 195–206).
Cresskill, NJ:
Hampton.
16.
HoneycuttJ. M. (2010b). Introduction. In HoneycuttJ. M. (Ed.), Imagine that: Studies in imagined interaction.
Cresskill, NJ:
Hampton.
17.
HoneycuttJ. M. (2015). Imagined interaction theory: Mental representations of interpersonal communication. In BraithwaiteD. O.SchrodtP. (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication (2nd ed., pp. 75–87).
Thousand Oaks, CA:
SAGE.
18.
HoneycuttJ. M.PenceM. E.GearhartC. C. (2013).
Associations between imagined interactions and the “Big Five” personality traits. Imagination, Cognition and Personality,
32(3), 273–289.
19.
HubbardT. L. (2018).
Some methodological and conceptual considerations in studies of auditory imagery. Auditory Perception & Cognition,
1(1–2), 6–41. doi:10.1080/25742442.2018.1499001
20.
HurlburtR. T. (2011). Investigating pristine inner experience: Moments of truth.
Cambridge, England:
Cambridge University Press.
21.
McCannR. M.HoneycuttJ. M. (2006).
A cross-cultural analysis of imagined interactions. Human Communication Research,
32, 274–301.
22.
MeadG. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society.
Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press.
23.
MorfC. C.MischelW. (2002). The self as a psycho-social dynamic processing system: Toward a converging science of selfhood. In LearyM. R.TangneyJ. P. (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (2nd ed., pp. 21–49).
New York, NY:
Guilford.
24.
MorinA. (2005).
Possible links between self-awareness and inner speech: Theoretical background, underlying mechanisms, and empirical evidence. Journal of Consciousness Studies,
12, 115–134.
25.
MorinA. (2009). Inner speech and consciousness. In BanksW. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of consciousness.
Amsterdam, the Netherlands:
Elsevier.
26.
MorinA. (2012). Inner speech. In: HirsteinW. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (2nd ed., pp 436–443).
San Diego, CA:
Elsevier.
27.
MorinA. (2017).
Toward a glossary of self-related terms. Frontiers in Psychology,
8, 280. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00280
28.
MorinA. (2018). The self-reflective functions of inner speech: Thirteen years later. In: Langland-HassanP.VicenteA. (Eds.), Inner speech: New voices.
Oxford, England:
Oxford University Press.
29.
MorinA.DuhnychC.RacyF. (2018).
Self-reported inner speech use in university students.Applied Cognitive Psychology,
32(3), 376–382. doi:10.1002/acp.3404
30.
MorinA.RacyF. (in press). Dynamic self-processes. In RauthmannJ. (Ed.), Handbook of personality dynamics and processes.
Amsterdam, the Netherlands:
Elsevier.
31.
MorinA.RunyanJ.BrinthauptT. (2015).
Editorial: Inner experiences: Theory, measurement, frequency, content, and functions. Frontiers in Cognitive Science,
2, 1–2.
32.
MorinA.UttlB. (2013). Inner speech: A window into consciousness. The Neuropsychotherapist. doi:10.12744/tnpt.14.04.2013.01
33.
MorinA.UttlB.HamperB. (2011).
Self-reported frequency, content, and functions of inner speech. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Journal,
30, 1714–1718.
34.
RacyF.MorinA.DuhnychC. (2019). Using a Thought Listing procedure to construct the General Inner Speech Questionnaire: An ecological approach. Journal of Constructivist Psychology.
35.
RosenblattP. C.MeyerC. (1986).
Imagined interactions and the family. Family Relations,
35(2), 319–324.
36.
TullettA. M.InzlichtM. (2010).
The voice of self-control: Blocking the inner voice increases impulsive responding. Acta Psychologica,
135, 252–256. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.07.008
37.
UttlB.MorinA.FauldsT.HallT.WilsonJ. (2012, June 7–9). Sampling inner speech using text messaging. Poster presented at the Canadian Society for Brain, Behavior, and Cognitive Science Conference, Kingston, ON.
38.
UttlB.MorinA.HamperB. (2011).
Are self-report questionnaires of inner speech valid and reliable?Procedia-Social and Behavioral Journal,
30, 1719–1723.
39.
WinslerA. (2009). Still talking to ourselves after all these years: A review of current research on private speech. In: WinslerA.FernyhoughC.MonteroI. (Eds.), Private speech, executive functioning, and the development of verbal self-regulation (pp 3–41).
New York, NY:
Cambridge University Press.
