The People We Meet

Abstract

A recent Bureau of Labor Statistics study reported Americans spend more time watching television than engaging in interpersonal activities. At the same time, television content is increasing in both complexity and quality, and important questions are emerging. With viewers spending increased time with television content through omnipresent screens and always-on mobile devices, and with the content becoming more compelling, are media effects changing? This study takes a fresh look at the deep relationships audiences have with today's complex television characters and the ultimate effects of those relationships by exploring parasocial interactions and relationships from an intrapersonal perspective. In this survey, we found compelling evidence that viewers use parasocial relationships to maintain relationships with television characters, keep conflict alive, undergo catharsis, and develop a better understanding of themselves and their viewpoints.

Keywords

parasocial imagined interaction television entertainment quantitative

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

T. H.

(1994, November) Absence makes the mind work harder: Imagined interactions and coping with geographical separation. Paper presented at the National Communication Association Conference, New Orleans, LA: .

Allen

T. H.

Honeycutt

J. M.

(1997) Planning, imagined interaction, and the nonverbal display of anxiety. Communication Research 24: 64–82. doi:10.1177/009365097024001003.

American Time Use Survey – 2010 Results (2010) Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/atus.pdf.

Auter

P. J.

Palmgreen

(2000) Development and validation of a parasocial interaction measure: The audience-persona interaction scale. Communication and Research Reports 17(1): 79–89.

Auter

P. J.

Ashton

Soliman

M. R.

(2008) A study of Egyptian and American young adult parasocial “relationships” with music video personae. Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research 1(2): 131–144. doi:10.1386/jammr.1.2.131/1.

Average TV Viewing for 2008–2009 TV Season at All-Time High. (2011). Nielsenwire.com. Retrieved from http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/average-tv-viewing-for-2008-09-tv-season-at-all-time-high/.

Berkos

K. M.

(2010) The role of imagined interactions in online communication. In: Honeycutt

J. M.

(eds) Imagine that: Studies in imagined interaction, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc, pp. 115–125.

Bryant

Zillmann

(1984) Using television to alleviate boredom and stress: Selective exposure as a function of induced excitational states. Journal of Broadcasting 28: 1–20. doi:10.1080/08838158409386511.

Burns, R., & Burns, R. (2011). Chapter 25: Discriminant analysis. Sagepub.com. Retrieved from http://www.uk.sagepub.com/burns/website%20material/Chapter%2025%20-%20Discriminant%20Analysis.pdf.

10.

Caughey

J. L.

(1984) Imaginary social worlds: A cultural approach, Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

11.

Chandler, D. (2004). Television violence and children's behaviour. Retrieved from http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Modules/TF33120/tv-violence_and_kids.html.

12.

Chory-Assad

R. M.

Yanen

(2005) Hopelessness and loneliness as predictors of older adults' involvement with favorite television performers. Journal of Broadcast & Electronic Media 49: 182–201. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4902_3.

13.

Cohen

(2003) Parasocial breakups: Measuring individual differences in responses to the dissolution of parasocial relationships. Mass Communication and Society 6: 191–202. doi:10.1207/S15327825MCS0602_5.

14.

Cohen

(2004) Para-social breakup from favorite television characters: The role of attachment styles and relationship intensity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 21: 187–202. doi:10.1177/0265407504041374.

15.

Conway

J. C.

Rubin

A. M.

(1991) Psychological predictors of television viewing motivations. Communication Research 18(4): 443–464. doi:10.1177/009365091018004001.

16.

Davison

W. P.

(1983) The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly 47(1): 1–15. doi:10.1086/268763.

17.

Edwards

Honeycutt

J. M.

Zagacki

K. S.

(1988) Imagined interaction as an element of social cognition. Western Journal of Speech Communication 52: 23–45. doi:10.1080/10570318809389623.

18.

Eyal

Cohen

(2006) When good friends say goodbye: A parasocial breakup study. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 50: 502–523. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem5003_9.

19.

Eyal

Rubin

A. M.

(2003) Viewer aggression and homophily, identification, and parasocial relationships with television characters. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 47: 77–98. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4701_5.

20.

Ford

S. G.

(2010) Retroactive imagined interactions, compensation, and bereavement. In: Honeycutt

J. M.

(eds) Imagine that: Studies in imagined interaction, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc, pp. 67–82.

21.

Gerbner

Gross

Morgan

Signorielli

(1986) Living with television: The dynamics of the cultivation process. In: Bryant

Zillman

(eds) Perspectives on media effects, Hilldale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 17–40.

22.

Gleich

(1997) Parasocial interaction with people on the screen. In: Winterhoff-Spurk

van der Voort

T. H. A.

(eds) New horizons in media psychology: Research cooperation and projects in Europe, Wiesbaden, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 35–55.

23.

Greenwood

Pietromonaco

P. R.

Long

C. R.

(2008) Young women's attachment style and interpersonal engagement with female TV stars. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 25: 387–407. doi:10.1177/0265407507087964.

24.

Gumpert

Cathcart

(1986) Inter/media: Interpersonal communication in a media world, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

25.

Harsanyi, D. (2010). All the drama's on TV. Denverpost.com. Retrieved from http://www.denverpost.com/opinion/ci_16820705.

26.

Hartmann

Schramm

(2008) The PSI-process scales: A new measure to assess the intensity and breadth of parasocial processes. Communications: The European Journal of Research 33: 385–401. doi:10.1515/COMM.2008.025.

27.

Honeycutt

J. M.

(2003) Imagined interactions: Daydreaming about communication, Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc.

28.

Honeycutt

J. M.

(2010) Imagine that: Studies in imagined interaction, Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc, pp. 1–14.

29.

Horton

Wohl

R. W.

(1956) Mass communication and parasocial interaction. Psychiatry 19: 215–229.

30.

Huberty

C. J.

Hussein

M. H.

(2003) Some problems in reporting discriminant analyses. The Journal of Experimental Education 72(1): 177–191. doi:10.1080/00220970309602062.

31.

Jin

S. A.

Park

(2009) Parasocial interaction with my avatar: Effects of interdependent self-construal and the mediating role of self-presence in an avatar-based console game, Wii. CyberPsychology & Behavior 12(6): 723–727. doi:10.1089/cpb.2008.0289.

32.

Johnson

(2006) Everything bad is good for you: How today's popular culture is actually making us smarter, New York, NY: Riverhead.

33.

Klimmt

Hartmann

Schramm

(2006) Parasocial interactions and relationships. In: Bryant

Vorderer

(eds) Psychology of entertainment, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 291–313.

34.

Levy

M. R.

(1979) Watching TV news as para-social interaction. Journal of Broadcasting 23: 69–80.

35.

Miller

G. R.

(1986) A neglected connection: Mass media exposure and interpersonal communicative competency. In: Gumpert

Cathcart

(eds) Inter/media: Interpersonal communication in a media world, 3rd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 132–139.

36.

Perse

E. M.

Rubin

A. M.

(1988) Audience activity and satisfaction with favorite television soap opera. Journalism Quarterly 65: 368–375.

37.

Perse

E. M.

Rubin

R. B.

(1989) Attribution in social and parasocial relationships. Communication Research 16: 59–77. doi:10.1177/009365089016001003.

38.

Perse

E. M.

Rubin

A. M.

(1990) Chronic loneliness and television use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 34: 37–53. doi:10.1080/08838159009386724.

39.

Porter, L., & Sanders, M. S. (2011). Hero worship: Exploring parasocial relationships' effect on perceptions of product placements. Paper presented at 2011 National Communication Association annual conference. New Orleans, LA.

40.

Postman

(1985) Amusing ourselves to death: Public discourse in the age of show business, New York, NY: Viking.

41.

Potter

W. J.

(2003) The 11 myths of media violence, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

42.

Raney

A. A.

(2006) The psychology of disposition-based theories of media enjoyment. In: Bryant

Vorderer

(eds) Psychology of entertainment, Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, pp. 137–150.

43.

Rogers

E. M.

(2002) Intermedia processes and powerful media effects. In: Bryant

Zillmann

(eds) Media effects: Advances in theory and research, 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, Inc, pp. 199–214.

44.

Rosenblatt

P. C.

Meyer

(1986) Imagined interactions in the family. Family Relations 35: 319–324. doi:10.2307/583641.

45.

Rubin

A. M.

Perse

E. M.

(1987) Audience activity and soap opera involvement: A uses and effects investigation. Human Communication Research 14: 246–268. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1987.tb00129.x.

46.

Rubin

A. M.

Perse

E. M.

Powell

R. A.

(1985) Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research 12: 155–180. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1985.tb00071.x.

47.

Rubin

R. B.

McHugh

M. P.

(1987) Development of parasocial interaction relationships. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 31: 279–292. doi:10.1080/08838158709386664.

48.

Rubinstein

Shaver

(1982) The experience of loneliness. In: Peplau

Perlman

(eds) Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research, and therapy, New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 206–223.

49.

Rule of Drama. (2013). Retrieved from http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/RuleOfDrama.

50.

Schiappa

Allen

Gregg

P. G.

(2007) Parasocial relationships and television: A meta-analysis of the effects. In: Preiss

R. W.

Gayle

B. M.

Allen

Bryant

(eds) Mass media effects research: Advances through meta-analysis, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, pp. 301–314.

51.

Schiappa

Gregg

P. B.

Hewes

D. E.

(2005) The parasocial contact hypothesis. Communications Monographs 72: 92–115.

52.

Schramm

Wirth

(2010) Testing a universal tool for measuring parasocial interactions across different situations and media. Journal of Media Psychology 22(1): 26–36.

53.

Singer

J. L.

(1999) Imagination. In: Runco

Pritzker

(eds) Encyclopedia of creativity Vol. 2San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 13–25.

54.

Sun

(2010) Antecedents and consequences of parasocial interaction with sport athletes and identification with sport teams. Journal of Sport Behavior 33(2): 194–217.

55.

Tan

A. S.

(1986) Social learning of aggression from television. In: Bryant

Zillmann

(eds) Perspectives on media effects, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 41–55.

56.

Theran

S. A.

Newberg

E. M.

Gleason

T. R.

(2010) Adolescent girls' parasocial interactions with media figures. The Journal of Genetic Psychology 171(3): 270–277. doi:10.1080/00221325.2010.483700.

57.

Treat

S. R.

(2010) Imagining interactions with phantasy: Shared horizons for imagined interactions and fantasy theme analysis. In: Honeycutt

J. M.

(eds) Imagine that: Studies in imagined interaction, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc, pp. 171–192.

58.

Turner

J. R.

(1993) Interpersonal and psychological predictors of parasocial interaction with different television performers. Communication Quarterly 41(4): 443–453. doi:10.1080/01463379309369904.

59.

Valkenburg

P. M.

Peter

(2006) Psychology of entertainment, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 105–117.

60.

Zillmann

(1988) Mood management through communication choices. American Behavioral Scientist 31: 327–340.