In this essay, we explore AI critically from the perspectives of the corpus and structure of knowledge, human control of knowledge-based processes (including business decision-making and public policymaking), and capitalist ideology. We present a preliminary test of our argument with a re-analysis of a corpus of citizen visions of desirable and sustainable futures across 30 countries in Europe, demonstrating how pre-trained AI provides findings that appear convincing but in effect lack situational and contextual understanding and depth. Indeed, AI relies on the data that has been used in its training. Our conclusions discuss how capitalism through AI aims for advanced forms of productivity and efficiency that pose new challenges to marketing as an embedded cultural practice. We offer some suggestions for ways macromarketing scholars can help overcome some of these challenges.
AhmadS. F.HanH.AlamM. M.RehmatM.IrshadM.Arraño-MuñozMAriza-MontesA. (2023). Impact of artificial intelligence on human loss in decision making, laziness and safety in education. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01787-8
AlsaighR.MehmoodR.KatibI. (2023). AI Explainability and governance in smart energy systems: A review. Frontiers in Energy Research, 11, 1071291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2023.1071291
4.
AndradaG.ClowesR. W.SmartP. R. (2023). Varieties of transparency: Exploring agency within AI systems. AI & Society, 38(4), 1321–1331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01326-6
5.
AroraN.ChakrabortyI.NishimuraY. (2024). AI-human hybrids for marketing research: Leveraging LLMs as collaborators. Journal of Marketing, 89(2), 43–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429241276529
6.
BishopJ. M. (2021). Artificial intelligence is stupid and causal reasoning will not fix it. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 513474. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.513474
7.
BotezA.HietanenJ. (2024). It is not consumption technologies that have put the ‘self’ in peril. Journal of Marketing Management, 40(7-8), 579–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2024.2346008
8.
BrynjolfssonE.McAfeeA. (2011). Race against the machine: How the digital revolution is accelerating innovation, driving productivity, and irreversibly transforming employment and the economy. Brynjolfsson and McAfee. Digital Frontier Press.
9.
DholakiaN.FıratA. F. (2019). Markets, consumers and society in the age of heteromation. European Journal of Marketing, 53(8), 1504–1520. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-11-2017-0916
10.
DholakiaN.OzgunA.AtikD. (2021). The unwitting corruption of broadening of marketing into neoliberalism: A beast unleashed?European Journal of Marketing, 55(3), 868–893. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-10-2018-0688
11.
DholakiaN.OzgunA.AtikD. (2023). The miasma of misinformation: A social analysis of media, markets, and manipulation. Consumption Markets & Culture, 26(3), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2022.2149508
12.
FerrellO. C.FerrellL. (2024). Building a better world: The role of AI ethics and social responsibility. Journal of Macromarketing, 44(4), 928–935. https://doi.org/10.1177/02761467241285793
13.
FıratA. F.DholakiaN. (2006). Theoretical and philosophical implications of postmodern debates: Some challenges to modern marketing. Marketing Theory, 6(2), 123–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593106063981
14.
FıratA. F.DholakiaN. (2017). From consumer to construer: Travels in human subjectivity. Journal of Consumer Culture, 17(3), 504–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540515623605
15.
FloridiL. (2023). AI As agency without intelligence: On ChatGPT, large language models, and other generative models. Philosophy & Technology, 36(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00621-y
16.
FowlerJ. G.WatsonA.RoyleM. T. (2024). Commentary on “AI is changing the world: For better or worse” using a neo-colonialism perspective. Journal of Macromarketing, 44(4), 900–905. https://doi.org/10.1177/02761467241284790
17.
GrewalD.GuhaA.BeckerM. (2024). AI is changing the world: For better or for worse?Journal of Macromarketing, 44(4), 870–882. https://doi.org/10.1177/02761467241254450
HilbertM. (2020). Digital technology and social change: The digital transformation of society from a historical perspective. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 22(2), 189–194. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.2/mhilbert
21.
KimT. W.MaimoneF.PattitK.SisonA. J.TeehankeeB. (2021). Master and slave: The dialectic of human-artificial intelligence engagement. Humanistic Management Journal, 6(3), 355–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-021-00118-w
22.
LauferR. (1992). The social acceptability of AI systems: Legitimacy, epistemology and marketing. AI & Society, 6(3), 197–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02472794
23.
LiB.QiP.LiuB.DiS.LiuJ.PeiJ.YiJ.ZhouB. (2023). Trustworthy AI: From principles to practices. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(9), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555803
24.
LiP.CasteloN.KatonaZ.SarvaryM. (2024). Frontiers: Determining the validity of large language models for automated perceptual analysis. Marketing Science, 43(2), 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2023.0454
25.
MarianiM. M.Perez-VegaR.WirtzJ. (2022). AI In marketing, consumer research and psychology: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Psychology & Marketing, 39(4), 755–776. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21619
26.
MoserC.Den HondF.LindebaumD. (2022). Morality in the age of artificially intelligent algorithms. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 21(1), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2020.0287
27.
MoskvichevA. K.OdouardV. V.MitchellM. (2023). The concept ARC benchmark: Evaluating understanding and generalization in the ARC domain. Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.07141
28.
NitzbergM.ZysmanJ. (2022). Algorithms, data, and platforms: The diverse challenges of governing AI. Journal of European Public Policy, 29(11), 1753–1778. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2096668
29.
NordströmM. (2022). AI Under great uncertainty: Implications and decision strategies for public policy. AI & Society, 37(4), 1703–1714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01263-4
30.
ParkD. M.LeeH. J. (2024). Literature review of AI hallucination research since the advent of ChatGPT: Focusing on papers from arXiv. Informatization Policy, 31(2), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.22693/NIAIP.2024.31.2.003
PuntoniS. (2024). Artificial intelligence in marketing: From computer science to social science. Journal of Macromarketing, 44(4), 883–885. https://doi.org/10.1177/02761467241282666
33.
QiuL.SinghP. V.SrinivasanK. (2023). Consumer risk preferences elicitation from large language models. SSRN, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4526072
34.
RepoP.MatschossK.TimonenP. (2017). Sustainable futures: Comparing methodologies for analyzing citizen visions in Europe. Sociology Study, 7(5), 246–262. https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5526/2017.05.002
ThompsonC. J. (2024). Towards an ontology of consumers as distributed networks (or the end of ‘consumer research’as we know it?): Retrospective insights from the praxeomorphism of Russell Belk’s ‘extended self’. Journal of Marketing Management, 40(7-8), 555–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2024.2345320
