The state remains an undertheorized actor in studies of market change. Further, when the state's market-shaping activities are considered, they are generally characterized by notions of control over, or conflict with, market actors. In this project, we draw on theories of institutional change and management to develop and deploy an alternative perspective on state involvement in markets—one premised on collaboration. Using this conceptual framework, we examine how the state works to shape markets disrupted by ostensibly innovative entrants. Specifically, we examine the state's response to the market entry of transportation businesses Uber and Lyft, whose strategies of disregarding existing regulatory arrangements attempt to deliberately exclude the state from markets. Leveraging an institutional work perspective, we find the state engaging in four novel practices as it works to understand and shape market arrangements in conjunction with an array of interested market actors. We discuss the implications of this collaborative state behavior for studies of market change.
AkkermanTjitskeHajerMaartenGrinJohn (2004), “The Interactive State: Democratisation from Above?” Political Studies, 52 (1), 82–95.
2.
AndrewsJ. CraigBurtonScotGundlachGregory T.HillRonald PaulKeesJeremyNetemeyerRichard G., et al. (2022), “What Exactly Is Marketing and Public Policy? Insights for JPPM Researchers,” Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 41 (1), 10–33.
3.
ArndtJohan (1981), “The Political Economy of Marketing Systems: Reviving the Institutional Approach,” Journal of Macromarketing, 1 (2), 36–47.
4.
ArnouldEric J.ThompsonCraig J. (2005), “Consumer Culture Theory (CCT): Twenty Years of Research,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (4), 868–882.
5.
BakerJonathan J.StorbackaKajBrodieRoderick J. (2019), “Markets Changing, Changing Markets: Institutional Work as Market Shaping,” Marketing Theory, 19 (3), 301–328.
6.
BattilanaJulieDoradoSilvia (2010), “Building Sustainable Hybrid Organizations: The Case of Commercial Microfinance Organizations,” Academy of Management Journal, 53 (6), 1419–1440.
7.
Bech-LarsenTinoAschemann-WitzelJessica (2012), “A Macromarketing Perspective on Food Safety Regulation: The Danish Ban on Trans-Fatty Acids,” Journal of Macromarketing, 32 (2), 208–219.
8.
BishopJohn Douglas (2012), “The Limits of Corporate Human Rights Obligations and the Rights of For-Profit Corporation,” Business Ethics Quarterly, 22 (1), 119–144.
9.
CarmanJames M.HarrisRobert G. (1984), “Public Regulation of Marketing Activity: Part I: Institutional Typologies of Market Failure,” Journal of Macromarketing, 4 (1), 49–58.
10.
CharmazKathy (2006), Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd.
11.
ChimentiGianluca (2020), “Conceptual controversies at the boundaries between markets: The case of ridesharing,” Consumption Markets and Culture, 23 (2), 130–153.
12.
Coskuner-BalliGokçen (2020), “Citizen-Consumers Wanted: Revitalizing the American Dream in the Face of Economic Recessions, 1981–2012,” Journal of Consumer Research, 47 (3), 327–349.
13.
Coskuner-BalliGökçenPehlivanEkinÜçok HughesMine (2021), “Institutional Work and Brand Strategy in the Contested Cannabis Market,” Journal of Macromarketing, 41 (4), 663–674.
14.
DahanNicolas M.DohJonathan P.RaelinJonathan D. (2015), “Pivoting the Role of Government in the Business and Society Interface: A Stakeholder Perspective,” Journal of Business Ethics, 131 (3), 665–680.
15.
DayGeorge S. (1994), “The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations,” Journal of Marketing, 58 (4), 37–52.
16.
DiMaggioPaul J. (1988), “Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory,” in Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing, 3–22.
17.
DiMaggioPaul J.PowellWalter W. (1983), “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields,” American Sociological Review, 48 (2), 147–160.
18.
DolbecPierre-YannFischerEileen (2015), “Refashioning a Field? Connected Consumers and Institutional Dynamics in Markets,” Journal of Consumer Research, 41 (6), 1447–1468.
19.
DomeganChristineBrychkovDmitryMcHughPatriciaMcNamaraÁineHarkinKatharineFitzgeraldChristine, et al. (2020), “Marketing systems: A Listen, Learn, Leverage Framework,” Journal of Macromarketing, 40 (3), 380–395.
20.
DomeganChristineMcHughPatriciaFlahertyTinaDuaneSinead (2019), “A Dynamic Stakeholders’ Framework in a Marketing Systems Setting,” Journal of Macromarketing, 39 (2), 136–150.
21.
EdelmanBenjaminGeradinDamien (2016), “Spontaneous Deregulation,” Harvard Business Review, 2016 (April), 80–87.
22.
ErtekinZeynep OzdamarAtikDeniz (2020), “Institutional Constituents of Change for a Sustainable Fashion System,” Journal of Macromarketing, 40 (3), 362–379.
23.
ErtimurBurçakCoskuner-BalliGokcen (2015), “Navigating the Institutional Logics of Markets: Implications for Strategic Brand Management,” Journal of Marketing, 79 (2), 40–61.
24.
FiratA. FuatVenkateshAlladi (1995), “Liberatory Postmodernism and the Reenchantment of Consumption,” Journal of Consumer Research, 22 (3), 239–267.
25.
FitzsimmonsEmma G. (2018), “Uber Hit with Cap as New York City Takes Lead in Crackdown,” The New York Times.
26.
FligsteinNeilDauterLuke (2007), “The Sociology of Markets,” Annual Review of Sociology, 33 (1), 105–128.
27.
GieslerMarkus (2008), “Conflict and Compromise: Drama in Marketplace Evolution,” Journal of Consumer Research, 34 (6), 739–753.
28.
GieslerMarkus (2012), “How Doppelgänger Brand Images Influence the Market Creation Process: Longitudinal Insights from the Rise of Botox Cosmetic,” Journal of Marketing, 76 (6), 55–68.
29.
GieslerMarkusFischerEileen (2017), “Market System Dynamics,” Marketing Theory, 17 (1), 3–8.
30.
GieslerMarkusVeresiuEla (2014), “Creating the Responsible Consumer: Moralistic Governance Regimes and Consumer Subjectivity,” Journal of Consumer Research, 41 (3), 840–857.
31.
GlaserBarney G. and StraussAnselm L. (2017), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Routledge.
32.
GolderPeter N. (2000), “Historical Method in Marketing Research with New Evidence on Long-Term Market Share Stability,” Journal of Marketing Research, 37 (2), 156–172.
33.
GrossNeil (2009), “A Pragmatist Theory of Social Mechanisms,” American Sociological Review, 74 (3), 358–379.
34.
HaackPatrickSchilkeOliverZuckerLynne (2021), “Legitimacy Revisited: Disentangling Propriety, Validity, and Consensus,” Journal of Management Studies, 58 (3), 749–781.
35.
HackerJacob S.Hertel-FernandezAlexanderPiersonPaulThelenKathleen (Eds.) (2021), The American Political Economy: Politics, Markets, and Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36.
HampelChristian E.LawrenceThomas B.TraceyPaul (2018), “Institutional Work: Taking Stock and Making It Matter,” in The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, GreenwoodR.OliverC.LawrenceT., et al, eds. London, UK: Sage Publications, 558–590.
37.
HandelmanJay M.ArnoldStephen J. (1999), “The Role of Marketing Actions with a Social Dimension: Appeals to the Institutional Environment,” Journal of Marketing, 63 (3), 33–48.
38.
HarrisRobert G.CarmanJames M. (1985), “Public Regulaton of Marketing Activity: Part II: Regulatory Responses to Market Failures,” Journal of Macromarketing, 5 (1), 41–52.
39.
HenleyJon (2017), “Uber Clashes with Regulators in Cities Around the World,” The Guardian, (September 29). The Guardian.
40.
HiattShon R.ParkSangchan (2013), “Lords of the Harvest: Third-Party Influence and Regulatory Approval of Genetically Modified Organisms,” Academy of Management Journal, 56 (4), 923–944.
41.
HumphreysAshlee (2010a), “Megamarketing: The Creation of Markets as a Social Process,” Journal of Marketing, 74 (2), 1–19.
42.
HumphreysAshlee (2010b), “Semiotic Structure and the Legitimation of Consumption Practices: The Case of Casino Gambling,” Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (3), 490–510.
43.
HumphreysAshleeCarpenterGregory S. (2018), “Status Games: Market Driving Through Social Influence in the U.S. Wine Industry,” Journal of Marketing, 82 (5), 141–159.
44.
HumphreysAshleeThompsonCraig J. (2014), “Branding Disaster: Reestablishing Trust through the Ideological Containment of Systemic Risk Anxieties,” Journal of Consumer Research, 41 (4), 877–910.
45.
InnesJudith E. (1996), “Planning Through Consensus Building: A New View of the Comprehensive Planning Ideal,” Journal of the American Planning Association, 62 (4), 460–472.
46.
JamalTazimGetzDonald (1999), “Community Roundtables for Tourism-Related Conflicts: The Dialectics of Consensus and Process Structures,” Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 7 (3–4), 290–313.
47.
JonesGeorgeStewartJohn (2012), “Local Government: The Past, the Present and the Future,” Public Policy and Administration, 27 (4), 346–367.
48.
KadirovDjavlonbekVareyRichard J.WolfendenSally (2016), “Investigating Chrematistics in Marketing Systems: A Research Framework,” Journal of Macromarketing, 36 (1), 54–67.
49.
KarababaEmınegülGerGülız (2011), “Early Modern Ottoman Coffeehouse Culture and the Formation of the Consumer Subject,” Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (5), 737–760.
50.
KingBrayden G.PearceNicholas A. (2010), “The Contentiousness of Markets: Politics, Social Movements, and Institutional Change in Markets,” Annual Review of Sociology, 36 (1), 249–267.
51.
KjeldgaardDannieAskegaardSørenRasmussenJannick ØrnstedtØstergaardPer (2017), “Consumers’ Collective Action in Market System Dynamics: A Case of Beer,” Marketing Theory, 17 (1), 51–70.
52.
KleinKenji (2017), “Entrepreneurship, Identity, and the Transformation of Marketing Systems: Medical Cannabis in California,” Journal of Macromarketing, 37 (1), 85–101.
53.
KozinetsRobert V. (2002), “Can Consumers Escape the Market? Emancipatory Illuminations from Burning Man,” Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (1), 20–38.
54.
KozinetsRobert V.HandelmanJay M. (2004), “Adversaries of Consumption: Consumer Movements, Activism, and Ideology,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (3), 691–704.
55.
LamontMichèleMolnárVirág (2002), “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences,” Annual Review of Sociology, 28 (1), 167–195.
56.
LawrenceThomas B. and SuddabyRoy (2006), “Institutions and Institutional Work,” in Sage Handbook of Organization Studies, CleggS.HardyC.LawrenceT. B.NordW. R., eds. London: Sage Publications, 215–254.
57.
LawrenceThomas B.HardyCynthiaPhillipsNelson (2002), “Institutional Effects of Interorganizational Collaboration: The Emergence of Proto- Institutions,” Academy of Management Journal, 45 (1), 281–290.
58.
LaytonRoger A. (2015), “Formation, Growth, and Adaptive Change in Marketing Systems,” Journal of Macromarketing, 35 (3), 302–319.
59.
LevittTheodore (1960), “Marketing Myopia,” Harvard Business Review, 38 (4), 45–56.
60.
LindblomCharles E. (2001), The Market System: What It Is, How It Works, and What To Make of It. New Haven, CT, USA: Yale University Press.
61.
MacielAndre F.FischerEileen (2020), “Collaborative Market Driving: How Peer Firms Can Develop Markets Through Collective Action,” Journal of Marketing, 84 (5), 41–59.
62.
MazzucatoMariana (2013), The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. London: Anthem Press.
63.
McAlexanderJames H. and SchoutenJohn W. (1998), “Brandfests: Servicescapes for the Cultivation of Brand Equity,” in Servicescapes: The Concept of Place in Contemporary Markets, SherryJ. F.Jr., ed. Chicago: NTC Business Books, 377–402.
64.
McCrackenGrant (1986), “Culture and Consumption: A Theoretical Account of the Structure and Movement of the Cultural Meaning of Consumer Goods,” Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (1), 71–84.
65.
McHughPatriciaDomeganChristine (2013), “From Reductionism to Holism: How Social Marketing Captures the Bigger Picture Through Collaborative System Indicators,” in Contemporary Issues in Social Marketing 2, KubackiK.Rundle-ThieleS., eds. London: Cambridge Scholars, 78–94.
66.
MeyerJohn W.RowanBrian (1977), “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony,” American Journal of Sociology, 83 (2), 340–363.
67.
MurrayJeff B.OzanneJulie L. (1991), “The Critical Imagination: Emancipatory Interests in Consumer Research,” Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (2), 129–144.
68.
PressMeleaArnouldEric J.MurrayJeff B.StrandKatherine (2014), “Ideological Challenges to Changing Strategic Orientation in Commodity Agriculture,” Journal of Marketing, 78 (6), 103–119.
69.
ReayTrishHiningsC. R. (2009), “Managing the Rivalry of Competing Institutional Logics,” Organization Studies, 30 (6), 629–652.
70.
SaundersBenjaminSimJuliusKingstoneTomBakerShulaWaterfieldJackieBartlamBernadette, et al. (2018), “Saturation in Qualitative Research: Exploring its Conceptualization and Operationalization,” Quality and Quantity, 52 (4), 1893–1907.
71.
ScarabotoDaianeFischerEileen (2013), “Frustrated Fatshionistas: An Institutional Theory Perspective on Consumer Quests for Greater Choice in Mainstream Markets,” Journal of Consumer Research, 39 (6), 1234–1257.
72.
ScottW. Richard (2008), Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
SpiggleSusan (1994), “Analysis and Interpretation of Qualitative Data in Consumer Research,” Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (3), 491–503.
75.
StewartDavid W. (2014), “What is Policy? And Why it Matters,” Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 33 (1), 1–3.
76.
StiglitzJoseph E. (2017), The Welfare State in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Roosevelt Institute.
77.
SwyngedouwErik (2005), “Governance Innovation and the Citizen: The Janus Face of Governance-Beyond-the-State,” Urban Studies, 42 (11), 1991–2006.
78.
ThompsonCraig J (1997), “Interpreting Consumers: A Hermeneutical Framework for Deriving Marketing Insights from the Texts of Consumers' Consumption Stories,” Journal of Marketing Research, 34 (4), 438.
79.
ThompsonCraig J. (2004), “Marketplace Mythology and Discourses of Power,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (1), 162–180.
80.
ThompsonCraig J. (2007), “A Carnivalesque Approach to the Politics of Consumption (or) Grotesque Realism and the Analytics of the Excretory Economy,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611 (1), 112–125.
81.
ThompsonCraig J.Coskuner-BalliGokcen (2007), “Countervailing Market Responses to Corporate Co-optation and the Ideological Recruitment of Consumption Communities,” Journal of Consumer Research, 34 (2), 135–152.
82.
TraceyPaulPhillipsNelsonHaughHelen (2005), “Beyond Philanthropy: Community Enterprise as a Basis for Corporate Citizenship,” Journal of Business Ethics, 58 (4), 327–344.
83.
TruongV. Dao (2017), “Government-led Macro-social Marketing Programs in Vietnam: Outcomes, Challenges, and Implications,” Journal of Macromarketing, 37 (4), 409–425.
84.
VeresiuElaGieslerMarkus (2018), “Beyond Acculturation: Multiculturalism and the Institutional Shaping of an Ethnic Consumer Subject,” Journal of Consumer Research, 45 (3), 553–570.
85.
WeberKlausRaoHayagreevaThomasL. G. (2009), “From Streets to Suites: How the Anti-Biotech Movement Affected German Pharmaceutical Firms,” American Sociological Review, 74 (1), 106–127.
86.
WitkowskiTerence H. and Brian JonesD. G. (2006), “Qualitative Historical Research in Marketing,” in Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods in Marketing, BelkR. W., ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 70–82.
87.
YngfalkAnna FyrbergYngfalkCarl (2020), “Modifying Markets: Consumerism and Institutional Work in Nonprofit Marketing,” Marketing Theory, 20 (3), 343–362.
88.
ZietsmaCharleneLawrenceThomas B. (2010), “Institutional Work in the Transformation of an Organizational Field: The Interplay of Boundary Work and Practice Work,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 55 (2), 189–221.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
