Macromarketing is often contrasted with micro-views of dyadic relationships, such as firm/customer interactions and transactional exchange. However, developing solutions for “wicked” social problems that are often viewed through a macro lens requires an approach that considers multiple perspectives at aggregated levels of interaction. We propose a framework for bridging the micro-macro divide by applying a metatheoretical lens, based on service-dominant logic and its service-ecosystems view. This approach highlights the importance of studying value cocreation practices as a microfoundation of macrostructures and highlights the need for studying institutions and institutional arrangements at varying levels of granularity. We argue for consideration of a meso-level, which is conceptually nested between micro-actions and macro-structures and allows researchers to investigate the emergence of markets as institutionalized, and potentially sustainable solutions. Exploring multiple levels of interaction can aid researchers and practitioners in understanding the complexity of wicked problems and cocreating solutions for major societal challenges faced in the world today.
AkakaMelissa ArchpruChandlerJennifer D (2011), “Roles as Resources: A Social Roles Perspective of Change in Value Networks,” Marketing Theory, 11 (3), 243-60.
4.
AkakaMelissa ArchpruVargoStephen LLuschRobert F (2013), “The Complexity of Context: A Service Ecosystems Approach for International Marketing,” Journal of International Marketing, 21 (4), 1-20.
5.
BarneyJ. A. Y.FelinTeppo (2013), “What are Microfoundations?” Academy of Management Perspectives, 27 (2), 138-55.
6.
BartelsRobert (1983), “Is Marketing Defaulting its Responsibilities?” Journal of Marketing, 47 (4), 32-5.
7.
BoxenbaumEvaPedersenJesper Strandgaard (2009), “Scandinavian Institutionalism: A Case of Institutional Work,” in Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations, LawrenceThomas BSuddabyRoyLecaBernard, eds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 178-204.
8.
CallonMichel (1998), “Introduction: The Embeddedness of Economic Markets in Economics,” The Sociological Review, 46 (1_suppl), 1-57.
9.
CampbellJohn L (2004), Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
ChandlerJennifer DDanatzisIliasWernickeCarolinAkakaMelissa ArchpruReynoldsDavid (2019), “How Does Innovation Emerge in a Service Ecosystem?,” Journal of Service Research, 22 (1), 75-89.
11.
ChandlerJennifer DVargoStephen L (2011), “Contextualization and Value-in-Context: How Context Frames Exchange,” Marketing Theory, 11 (1), 35-49.
12.
CrowleyKateHeadBrian W. (2017), “The Enduring Challenge of ‘Wicked Problems’: Revisiting Rittel and Webber,” Policy Sciences, 50 (4), 539-47.
13.
CzarniawskaBarbara and SevónGuje (Eds) 1996), Translating Organizational Change. Berlin: de Gruyter.
14.
DolanPaddy (2002), “The Sustainability of ‘Sustainable Consumption,” Journal of Macromarketing, 22 (2), 170-81.
15.
EdvardssonBoTronvollBårdGruberThorsten (2011), “Expanding Understanding of Service Exchange and Value Co-Creation: A Social Construction Approach,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39 (2), 327-39.
16.
GiddensAnthony (1984), The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
17.
GieslerMarkusFischerEileen (2017), “Market System Dynamics,” Marketing Theory, 17 (1), 3-8.
18.
HaackPatrickSiewekeJostWesselLauri (2019), “Microfoundations and Multi-Level Research on Institutions,” in Microfoundations of Institutions (Research in the Sociology of Organizations), Vol. 65A, HaackPatrickSiewekeJostWesselLauri, eds. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited, 11-40.
19.
HolbrookMorris B (2003), “Adventures in Complexity: An Essay on Dynamic Open Complex Adaptive Systems, Butterfly Effects, Self-Organizing Order, Coevolution, the Ecological Perspective, Fitness Landscapes, Market Spaces, Emergent Beauty at the Edge of Chaos, and All That Jazz,” Academy of Marketing Science Review, 6 (1), 1-184.
20.
HuffAimee DinninBarnhartMichelleMcAlexanderBrandonMcAlexanderJim (2017), “Addressing the Wicked Problem of American gun Violence: Consumer Interest Groups as Macro-Social Marketers,” Journal of Macromarketing, 37 (4), 393-408.
21.
HuntShelby D (1976), “The Nature and Scope of Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 40 (3), 17-28.
22.
HuntShelby D (2003), Controversy in Marketing Theory: For Reason, Realism, Truth, and Objectivity. New York, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
23.
HuntShelby D (2010), “Doctoral seminars in marketing theory,” Journal of Historical Research in Marketing, 2 (4), 443-56.
24.
HuntShelby D (2020), “Institutional Norms and the Institutionalization of Macromarketing: Historical Insights, the Long Macro View, and Service-Dominant Logic,” Journal of Macromarketing, 40 (3), 286-93.
25.
KennedyAnn-Marie (2016), “Macro-social Marketing,” Journal of Macromarketing, 36 (3), 354-65.
26.
KennedyAnn-MarieParsonsAndrew (2012), “Macro-Social Marketing and Social Engineering: A Systems Approach,” Journal of Social Marketing, 2 (2), 37-51.
27.
KjellbergHansHelgessonClaes-Fredrik (2006), “Multiple Versions of Markets: Multiplicity and Performativity in Market Practice,” Industrial Marketing Management, 35 (7), 839-55.
28.
KjellbergHansHelgessonClaes-Fredrik (2007), “On the Nature of Markets and Their Practices,” Marketing Theory, 7 (2), 137-62.
29.
Koskela-HuotariKaisaVargoStephen L (2016), “Institutions as Resource Context,” Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 26 (2), 163-78.
LatourBruno (1986), “The Powers of Association,” in Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?LawJohn, ed. Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 264-80.
32.
LatourBruno (2005), Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
33.
LaytonRoger A (2007), “Marketing Systems—A Core Macromarketing Concept,” Journal of Macromarketing, 27 (3), 227-42.
34.
LaytonRoger A (2008), “The Search for A Dominant Logic: A Macromarketing Perspective,” Journal of Macromarketing, 28 (3), 215-27.
35.
LaytonRoger A (2019), “Marketing Systems–Looking Backward, Sizing up and Thinking Ahead,” Journal of Macromarketing, 39 (2), 208-24.
36.
LounsburyMichael (2001), “Institutional Sources of Practice Variation: Staffing College and University Recycling Programs,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 46 (1), 29-56.
37.
LuschRobert F (2006), “The Small and Long View,” Journal of Macromarketing, 26 (2), 240-44.
38.
LuschRobert F (2017), “The Long Macro View,” Journal of Macromarketing, 37 (3), 321-23.
39.
LuschRobert FVargoStephen L (2006), “Service-Dominant Logic: Reactions, Reflections and Refinements,” Marketing theory, 6 (3), 281-88.
40.
LuschRobert FVargoStephen L (2014), Service-Dominant Logic: Premises, Perspectives, Possibilities, New York: Cambridge University Press.
41.
NicoliniDavide (2009), “Zooming In and Out: Studying Practices by Switching Theoretical Lenses and Trailing Connections,” Organization Studies, 30, 1391-418.
42.
PeñalozaLisaMishJenny (2011), “The Nature and Processes of Market Co-Creation in Triple Bottom Line Firms: Leveraging Insights From Consumer Culture Theory and Service Dominant Logic,” Marketing Theory, 11 (1), 9-34.
43.
PittzThomas GSteinerSusan DPenningtonJulia R (2019), “An Ethical Marketing Approach to Wicked Problems: Macromarketing for the Common Good,” Journal of Business Ethics, 1-10.
44.
RittelHorst WWebberMelvin M (1973), “2.3 Planning Problems Are Wicked,” Polity, 4 (155), e169.
45.
RogersEverett M (2010), Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Simon and Schuster.
46.
RumeTanjenaDidar-Ul IslamS. M. (2020), “Environmental Effects of COVID-19 Pandemic and Potential Strategies of Sustainability,” Heliyon, 6 (9), e04965.
47.
SchatzkiTheodore R (1996), Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. New York: Cambridge University Press.
48.
SevónGuje (1996), “Organizational Imitation in Identity Transformation,” in Translating Organizational Change, Vol. 56, CzarniawskaBarbaraSevónGuje, eds. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 49-67.
49.
ShapiroStanley JTadajewskiMarkShultzClifford J (2009), “Interpreting Macromarketing: The Construction of A Major Macromarketing Research Collection,” Journal of Macromarketing, 29 (3), 325-34.
50.
VargoStephen L (2007), “On A Theory of Markets and Marketing: From Positively Normative to Normatively Positive,” Australasian Marketing Journal AMJ, 15 (1), 53-60.
51.
VargoStephen LAkakaMelissa Archpru (2012), “Value Cocreation and Service Systems (Re) Formation: A Service Ecosystems View,” Service Science, 4 (3), 207-17.
52.
VargoStephen LAkakaMelissa ArchpruWielandHeiko (2020), “Rethinking the Process of Diffusion in Innovation: A Service-Ecosystems and Institutional Perspective,” Journal of Business Research, 116 (August), 526-34.
53.
VargoStephen LKoskela-HuotariKaisaBaronSteveEdvardssonBoReynosoJavierColurcioMaria (2017), “A Systems Perspective on Markets–Toward A Research Agenda,” Journal of Business Research, 79, 260-68.
54.
VargoStephen LLuschRobert F (2004), “Evolving to A New Dominant Logic for Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 68 (1), 1-17.
55.
VargoStephen LLuschRobert F (2008), “Service-Dominant Logic: Continuing the Evolution,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36 (1), 1-10.
56.
VargoStephen LLuschRobert F (2011), “It's All B2B… and Beyond: Toward A Systems Perspective of the Market,” Industrial Marketing Management, 40 (2), 181-87.
57.
VargoStephen LLuschRobert F (2013), “Service-Dominant Logic: Prologue and Prospects,” Die Betriebswirtschaft, 73 (2), 91-3.
58.
VargoStephen LLuschRobert F (2016), “Institutions and Axioms: An Extension and Update of Service-Dominant Logic,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44 (1), 5-23.
59.
VargoStephen LLuschRobert F (2017), “Service-Dominant Logic 2025,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34 (1), 46-67.
60.
VargoStephen LMaglioPaul PAkakaMelissa Archpru (2008), “On Value and Value Co-Creation: A Service Systems and Service Logic Perspective,” European Management Journal, 26 (3), 145–52.
61.
VargoStephen LWielandHeikoAkakaMelissa Archpru (2015), “Innovation Through Institutionalization: A Service Ecosystems Perspective,” Industrial Marketing Management, 44 (January), 63-72.
62.
VenkateshAlladiPenalozaLisaFiratA. Fuat (2006), “The Market as A Sign System and the Logic of the Market,” in The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate, and Directions, LuschR. F.VargoS. L., eds. Armonk, MA: ME Sharpe, 251-65.
63.
ViswanathanMadhuJungKijuVenugopalSrinivasMinefeeIshvaWoo JungIn (2014), “Subsistence and Sustainability: From Micro-Level Behavioral Insights to Macro-Level Implications on Consumption, Conservation, and the Environment,” Journal of Macromarketing, 34 (1), 8-27.
64.
ViswanathanMadhuRosaJosé Antonio (2010), “Understanding Subsistence Marketplaces: Toward Sustainable Consumption and Commerce for A Better World,” Journal of Business Research, 63 (6), 535-37.
