Hitherto, the pure marketing concept has focused on creating value for firms and their customers in a manner consistent with the Dominant Social Paradigm (DSP). Nevertheless, as the sustainability paradigm established stronger roots over the last few decades, the marketing discipline may benefit by creating value from a broader perspective to stimulate shared prosperity and wealth for society at large. This paper proposes a four-stage model of value creation that classifies sustainability-oriented marketing approaches guided by different economic paradigms and different levels of involvement. This commentary provides a framework for organizations to reframe their marketing approach. The goal is to gravitate from a firm-centric approach to a society-centric approach to enhance societal well-being.
BenklerYochai (2017), “Peer Production, the Commons, and the Future of the Firm,” Strategic Organization, 15 (2), 264‐74.
3.
BennSuzanneEdwardsMelissaWilliamsTim (2018), Organizational Change for Corporate Sustainability. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis Group.
4.
CornelissenJoep (2016), “Editor’s Comments: Developing Propositions, A Process Model, or A Typology? Addressing the Challenges of Writing Theory Without A Boilerplate,” Academy of Management, 42 (1), 1‐9.
5.
CovaBernardKozinetsRobert V.ShankarAvi (2011), “Tribes, Inc.: The New World of Tribalism,” in Consumer Tribes, Routledge, Kindle Edition: pp. 440‐982.
6.
DruckerPeter (2020), The Essential Drucker. New York, NY: HarperCollins eBooks, Kindle Edition.
7.
FıratA. FuatDholakiaNikhilesh (2017), “From Consumer to Construer: Travels in Human Subjectivity,” Journal of Consumer Culture, 17 (3), 504‐22.
8.
FranklinAdrian (2011), Ethical Consumption: A Critical Introduction. Abingdon: Routledge.
9.
FuchsChristian (2017), Social Media: A Critical Introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
GladwinThomas N.KennellyJames J.KrauseTara-Shelomith (1995), “Shifting Paradigms for Sustainable Development: Implications for Management Theory and Research,” Academy of Management, 20 (4), 874–907.
11.
GummessonEvert (2004), “From One-to-One to Many-to-Many Marketing,” in QUIS 9, Edvardsson et al.Bo , ed. Karlstad, Sweden: Karlstad University, 16–25.
12.
GummessonEvert (2015), “Many-to-Many Marketing as Grand Theory: A Nordic School Contribution,” in The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate, and Directions, LuschRobert F. VargoStephen L., eds. New York: Routledge, 339–353.
13.
GundlachGregory T.WilkieWilliam L. (2009), “The American Marketing Association's New Definition of Marketing: Perspective and Commentary on the 2007 Revision,” Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 28 (2), 259‐64.
14.
HagelJohnSeely BrownJohn (2005), The Only Sustainable Edge: Why Business Strategy Depends on Productive Friction and Dynamic Specialization. Harvard Business School Press.
15.
HoffmanAndrew J.Devereaux JenningsP. (2015), “Institutional Theory and the Natural Environment: Research In (and On) the Anthropocene,” Organization & Environment, 28 (1), 8‐31.
16.
KelleciAlpaslanYıldızOğuz (2021), “A Guiding Framework for Levels of Sustainability in Marketing,” Sustainability, 13 (4), 1644.
17.
KotlerPhilip (2020), “Marketing and Value Creation,” Journal of Creating Value, 6 (1), 10‐1.
18.
KotlerPhilipArmstrongGary (2018), Principles of Marketing. London: Pearson.
19.
MarxKarl (1867), Capital (Vol. 1). London: Penguin.
20.
MarxKarl (1997), Writings of the Young Marx on Philosophy and Society. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
MuzellecLaurentRonteauSébastienLambkinMary (2015), “Two-Sided Internet Platforms: A Business Model Lifecycle Perspective,” Industrial Marketing Management, 45 (1), 139‐50.
24.
PorterMichael E.KramerMark R. (2011), “Creating Shared Value: How to Reinvent Capitalism —and Unleash a Wave of Innovation and Growth,” Harvard Business Review. January-February,62–77.
25.
RamosJose (2017), “Cosmo-Localization and Leadership for the Future,” Journal of Futures Studies, 21 (4), 65‐84.
SaravadeSwapnilFelixRetoFuat FıratA. (2021), “From Solidity to Liquidity: Macro-Level Consumption Patterns in the Sharing Economy,” Journal of Macromarketing, 41 (2), 284‐96.
StahelWalter R. (1997), “The Functional Economy: Cultural and Organizational Change,” in The Industrial Green Game: Implications for Environmental Design and Management, RichardsDeanna J., ed. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 91–100.
30.
SteffenAdrienne (2017), Second-Hand Consumption as A Lifestyle Choice. Creative Commons - Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0.
31.
SzmiginIsabelleCarriganMarylynBekinCaroline (2011), “New Consumption Communities and the Reenabling of 21st Century Consumers,” in Consumer Tribes, Bernard Cova, KozinetsRobert VShankarAvi, eds. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 6687‐7017.
