As the Internet makes secondary data increasingly more accessible and less costly to obtain, the need for methods to evaluate the reliability and validity of such data has grown accordingly. In efforts to harness the surge of data at the country level, researchers have created indexes to more efficiently track the performance of societies on a variety of dimensions. Large-scale global indexes like the Sustainable Society Index (SSI), published biannually since 2006 by the Sustainable Society Foundation, have the potential to provide valuable insights into important issues related to macromarketing, sustainability, and quality of life. The primary purpose of this article is to assess the value of a societal-level index for macromarketing research. By evaluating the reliability, internal validity and external validity of a societal-level index, such as the SSI, researchers will be better informed about the importance of such an index, but will also understand how the protocol used in this study can be applied to other indexes. In order to gauge the external validity of the SSI, the study also evaluates and utilizes three other established secondary data sources in conjunction with the SSI. These include: (1) the Legatum Prosperity Index; (2) Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index; and (3) the Euromoney Country Risk Index.
AbdiHervé (2010), “Coefficient of Variation”. Encyclopedia of Research Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 169–71.
2.
AczelAmir D. (1993), Complete Business Statistics, 2nd ed. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
3.
AsiriBatool K.HubailRehab A. (2014), “An Empirical Analysis of Country Risk Ratings,” Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 5 (4), 52.
4.
BusseChristian (2010), “A Procedure for Secondary Data Analysis: Innovation by Logistics Service Providers,” The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46 (4), 44–58.
5.
Cuervo-CazurraAlvaro (2008), “Better the Devil You Don’t Know: Types of Corruption and FDI in Transition Economies,” Journal of International Management, 14 (1), 12–27.
6.
DavenportThomas H. (2014), Big Data @ Work: Dispelling the Myths, Uncovering the Opportunities. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
GibbonJohn (1971), “Scalar Timing and Semi-Markov Chains in Free-Operant Avoidance,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 8 (1), 109–38.
12.
GobbleMaryAnne M. (2013), “Big Data: The Next Big Thing in Innovation,” Research Technology Management, 56 (1), 64–66.
13.
HairJoseph F.BlackWilliam C.BabinBarry J.AndersonRolph E. (2010), Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective, 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
14.
HillRonald PaulDhandaKanwalroop Kathy (2004), “Globalization and Technological Achievement: Implications for Macromarketing and the Digital Divide,” Journal of Macromarketing, 24 (December), 147–55.
15.
HoustonMark B. (2004), “Assessing the Validity of Secondary Data Proxies for Marketing Constructs,” Journal of Business Research, 57 (2), 154–61.
16.
HuntShelby D. (1981), “Macromarketing as a Multidimensional Concept,” Journal of Macromarketing, 1 (1), 7–8.
JoselynRobert W. (1977), Designing the Marketing Research Project. New York, NY: Mason/Charter Publishers, Inc.
19.
Kaivo-ojaJariPanula-OnttoJuhaVehmasJarmoLuukkanenJyrki (2014), “Relationships of the Dimensions of Sustainability as Measured by the Sustainable Society Index Framework,” International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 21 (1), 39–45.
20.
KerkGeurt van deManuelArthur (2013), “Sustainable Society Foundation,” (accessed March 27, 2015), [available athttp://www.ssfindex.com/].
21.
LaytonRoger (2009), “On Economic Growth, Marketing Systems, and the Quality of Life,” Journal of Macromarketing, 29 (4), 349–62.
MalhotraNaresh K. (1996), Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24.
MalhotraNaresh K.PetersonMarkKleiserSusan Bardi (1998), “Assessing the Reliability and Validity of International Secondary Data Used to Design Competitive Strategies for Global Marketing,” in Research in Marketing, Vol. 14, Ajay Manrai and Lalita Manrai, eds. Stamford, CT: JAI Press, 185–28.
25.
MengJie (2015), “Sustainability: A Framework of Typology Based on Efficiency and Effectiveness,” Journal of Macromarketing, 35 (1), 84–98.
26.
MittelstaedtJohn D.ShultzClifford J.KilbourneWilliam E.PetersonMark (2014), “Sustainability as Megatrend: Two Schools of Macromarketing Thought,” Journal of Macromarketing, 34 (3), 253–64.
27.
MooreDavidMcCabeGeorge P.CraigBruce A. (2012), Introduction to the Practice of Statistics, 7th ed. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
28.
MulaikStanley A. (1972), The Foundations of Factor Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
MullenMichael R.MilneGeorge R.DoneyPatricia M. (1995), “An International Marketing Application of Outlier Analysis for Structural Equations: A Methodological Note,” Journal of International Marketing, 3 (1), 45–62.
31.
NicholsonShawn W.BennettTerrence B. (2009), “Transparent Practices: Primary and Secondary Data in Business Ethics Dissertations,” Journal of Business Ethics, 84 (3), 417–25.
32.
O’LearyMick (2008), “Prosperity Index Defines National Well-Being,” Information Today, 25 (1), 35.
33.
PatzerGordon L. (1995), Using Secondary Data in Marketing Research. Westport, CT: Praeger.
34.
PetersonMarkMalhotraNaresh K. (1997), “Comparative Marketing Measures of SocietalQuality of Life: Substantive Dimensions in 186 Countries,” Journal of Macromarketing, 17 (Spring), 25–38.
35.
PetersonMark (2006), “Focusing the Future of Macromarketing,” Journal of Macromarketing, 26 (December), 245–49.
PunjGirishStewartDavid W. (1983), “Cluster Analysis in Marketing Research: Review and Suggestions for Application,” Journal of Marketing Research, 20 (2), 134–48.
38.
RabianskiJoseph S. (2006), “Primary and Secondary Data: Concepts, Errors and Issues,” Appraisal Journal, 71 (1), 43–55.
39.
RiceJohn A. (2006), Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.
40.
SahaShrabaniGounderRukmaniSuJen-Je (2012), “Is There a “Consensus” Towards Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index?” International Journal of Business Studies, 20 (1), 1–9.
SchultzDon E. (2014), “Why Big Data is so Difficult,” Marketing News, 48 (5), 20.
43.
ShultzClifford JII (2007), ‘‘Marketing as Constructive Engagement,’’Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 26 (2), 293–301.
44.
TasicSvetlanaFeruhMarija Belin (2012), “Errors and Issues in Secondary Data Used in Marketing Research,” Scientific Journal for Theory and Practice of Socio-Economic Development, Socioeconomica (SJSECO), 1 (2), 326–35.
45.
Transparency International - The Global Coalition against Corruption (2014), “Transparency International - The Global Coalition against Corruption,” (accessed March 27, 2015), [available athttp://www.transparency.org/].
46.
UslanerEric M. (2008), Corruption, Inequality, and the Rule of Law: The Bulging Pocket Makes the Easy Life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
47.
ViswanathanMadhuJungKijuVenugopalSrinivasMinefeeIshvaWoo JungIn (2014), “Subsistence and Sustainability: From Micro-Level Behavioral Insights to Macro-Level Implications on Consumption, Conservation, and the Environment,” Journal of Macromarketing, 34 (1), 8–27.
