Abstract
Mark Peterson’s is the latest in a number of efforts to provide macromarketing teaching materials. This commentary discusses two important monographs published in the early 1970s; Fisk’s early attempt to spell out the domain of macromarketing; the first macromarketing bibliography, which appeared in 1990; and an important article by Tamilia in which he argued that, for purposes of both pedagogy and further disciplinary development, a macromarketing textbook was urgently required. Attention is then called to more recent efforts to provide macromarketing reading lists and to promote a “controversies-based” approach to the study of macromarketing. The closing section explores the similarities and shared macromarketing dimensions of Peterson’s
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
