This article is a comment and reflection on Hill’s text on unconditional basic income (this issue). It deals with a main tendency in contemporary, neoliberal societies, a tendency that—it is suggested—contributes to the experience of unconditional income as a controversial and even unrealistic proposition. Drawing inspiration from Hobbes’ Leviathan, itis argued that the harsh reception of the idea of an unconditional income is intertwined with a general erosion of the notion of society, that is, of a conception of a collective whole, a commonwealth, that transcends the individual.
Bauman, Z.1993. Postmodernethics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
2.
Hill, Ronald Paul. 2005. Do the poor deserve less than surfers? An essay for the special issue on vulnerable consumers. Journal of Macromarketing25 (2): 215-218.
3.
Hobbes, T.1651/1991. Leviathan. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Hobsbawn, E.1995. Age of extremes: The short twentieth century 1914- 1991. London: Time Warner Books.
5.
Parsons, T.1949. The structure of social action. New York: Free Press.
6.
Scott, M. B., and S. M. Lyman. 1968. Accounts. American Sociological Review33 (1): 46-62.
7.
Tönnies, F.1957/1988. Community and society. Somerset, UK: Transaction Books.
