The role of social responsibility within business has been debated for decades. It appears that there is a growing understanding that doing the right thing for society can not only be good for business but is also a responsibility of the modern corporation. Causes, corporations, and society have benefited from corporate involvement with social issues. However, it also appears that in some cases, there may be potential pitfalls associated with merging social and corporate objectives. The “overcommercialization” of some activities designed to benefit society may in fact harm those that these activities are trying to help. This article examines potential pitfalls associated with cause-related marketing and provides recommendations for reducing the potential negative consequences.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abrahams, B.1996. Profit from principles. Marketing, 11 July, 22-23.
2.
Andreasen, A. R.1996. Profits for nonprofits: Find a corporate partner. Harvard Business Review74 (6): 47-59.
3.
Andreasen, A. R. , and M. E. Drumwright. 2000. Alliances and ethics in social marketing. In Ethical issues in social marketing, edited by A. K. Andreasen, 95-124. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
4.
Argandoña, A.1998. The stakeholder theory of the common good. Journal of Business Ethics17:1093-1102.
5.
Austin, J.2000. The collaboration challenge: How nonprofits and business succeed through strategic alliances. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Bailey, R.1994. Book review—Patterns of corporate philanthropy: The progressive deception. Chief Executive92:73-73.
7.
Barnes, N. G.1991. Philanthropy, profits and problems: The emergence of joint venture marketing. ABER22 (4): 78-86.
8.
Barnes, N. G.1994. Cause-related marketing revisited: The effects of the United Way scandal. American Business Review12 (2): 95-99.
9.
Barone, M. C. , A. D. Miyazaki, and K. A. Taylor. 2000. The influence of cause marketing on consumer choice: Does one good turn deserve another?Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science28 (2): 248-262.
10.
Baumhart, R. C.1961. How ethical are businessmen?Harvard Business Review38:6-12, 16-19, 156-166.
11.
Buchholtz, A. K. , A. C. Amason, and M. A. Ruterford. 1999. Beyond resources: The mediating effect of top management discretion and values on corporate philanthropy. Business and Society38 (2): 167-187.
12.
Business in the Community. 1998. The cause related marketing guidelines: Towards excellence [Online]. Available: http://www.crm.org.uk/step2/publications/guidelines.htm.
13.
Campbell, L. , C. S. Gulas, and T. S. Gruca. 1999. Corporate giving behavior and decision-maker social consciousness. Journal of Business Ethics19 (4): 375-383.
14.
Carringer, P. T.1994. Not just a worthy cause: Cause-related marketing delivers the goods and the good. American Advertising10 (1): 16-19.
15.
Carroll, A. B.1993. Business and society: Ethics and stakeholder management. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing.
16.
Caudron, S.1994. Fight crime, sell products. Industry Week243 (20): 49-52.
17.
Cheary, N.1997. The limits of affinity. Marketing Week20 (20): 26-29.
18.
Clarkson, M.B.E.1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review20 (1): 92-117.
19.
Coddington, W.1993. Environmental marketing: Positive strategies for reaching green consumers. New York: McGraw-Hill.
20.
Collins, M.1994. Global corporate philanthropy and relationship marketing. European Management Journal12 (2): 226-233.
21.
Cone, C. L.1996. Doing well by doing good. Association Management48 (4): 103-108.
22.
Dalton, D. R. , and C. M. Daily. 1991. The constituents of corporate responsibility: Separate, but not inseparable, interests?Business Horizons34 (4): 74-78.
23.
Davidson, J.1997. Cancer sells. Working Woman22 (5): 36-39.
24.
Direct Marketing . 1997. Cause related marketing makes new strides in the United Kingdom. Direct Marketing60 (4): 7-8.
25.
Dodson, L.1998. Business to the rescue. Australian Financial Review,19May, 18-18.
26.
Donlon, J. P.1998. Zen and the art of cause-related marketing. Chief Executive138 (October): 51-57.
27.
Drumwright, M. E.1994. Socially responsible organizational buying: Environmental concern as a noneconomic buying criterion. Journal of Marketing58 (3): 1-19.
28.
Drumwright, M. E.1996. Company advertising with a social dimension: The role of noneconomic criteria. Journal of Marketing60 (4): 71-87.
29.
Drumwright, M. E. , and P. Murphy. 2001. Corporate societal marketing. In The handbook of marketing and society, edited by P. N. Bloom and G. T. Gundlach, 168-183. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
File, K. M. , and R. A. Prince. 1998. Cause related marketing and corporate philanthropy in the privately held enterprise. Journal of Business Ethics17 (14): 1529-1539.
31.
Friedman, M.1962. Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
Frumkin, P.1996. A distorted portrait of corporate philanthropy. Foundation News37 (2): 22-25.
33.
Gray, S.1997. Tracking big-business donations. The Chronicle of Philanthropy, November, 27-27.
34.
Hoffman, A.1998. Two sides of the coin, corporate giving is business. Fund Raising Management29 (1): 27-30.
35.
Industry Commission . 1995. Charitable organizations in Australia. Report 45. Melbourne: Australian Government Publishing Services.
36.
Kahn, F. S.1997. Pandora’s box: Managerial discretion and the problem of corporate philanthropy. UCLA Law Review44 (3): 576-676.
37.
Kelley, B.1991. Cause-related marketing: Doing well while doing good. Sales and Marketing Management143 (3): 60-64.
38.
Klincewicz, K.1998. Ethical aspects of sponsorship. Journal of Business Ethics17:1103-1110.
39.
Larson, J.1995. Sweet charity. American Demographics, May, 68-72.
40.
Meenaghan, T.1983. Commercial sponsorship. European Journal of Marketing17:5-43.
41.
Meenaghan, T. , and D. Shipley. 1999. Media effect in commercial sponsorship. European Journal of Marketing33 (3/4): 328-347.
42.
Mendleson, N. , and M. J. Polonsky. 1995. Using strategic alliances to develop credible green marketing. Journal of Consumer Marketing12 (2): 4-18.
43.
Mescon, T. S. , and D. J. Tilson. 1987. Corporate philanthropy a strategic approach to the bottom-line. California Management Review29 (3): 49-61.
44.
Meyer, H.1999. When the cause is just. Journal of Business Strategy20 (6): 27-31.
45.
Michaels, N.1995. Plan your civic marketing. Managers Magazine70 (9): 16-18.
46.
Mihaly, S. P.1997. Ramada franchisees give new meaning to CRM. Franchising World29 (5): 20-21.
47.
Miller, C.1993. Tapping into women’s issues is potent way to reach market. Marketing News27 (25): 1-1, 13-13.
48.
Milne, G. , E. Iyer, and S. Gooding-Williams. 1996. Environmental organization alliance relationships within and across nonprofit, business, and government sectors. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing15 (2): 203-215.
49.
Milner, L. M.1996. Determinants of corporate donations to nonprofits. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing4 (1/2): 11-20.
50.
Minow, N.1999. Corporate charity: An oxymoron?The Business Lawyer54 (3): 997-1001.
51.
Mitchell, A.1998. Business pays the price for having a conscience. Marketing Week21 (41): 38-39.
52.
Mullen, J.1997. Performance-based corporate philanthropy: How “giving smart” can further corporate goals. Public Relations Quarterly42 (2): 42-48.
Nonprofit World . 1998. When does cause related marketing work best?Non-profit World16 (5): 55-55.
55.
Osterhus, T. L.1997. Pro-social consumer influence strategies: When and how do they work?Journal of Marketing61 (3): 16-29.
56.
O’Sullivan, P. , and P. Murphy. 1998. Ambush marketing: The ethical issues. Psychology and Marketing15 (4): 349-366.
57.
Polonsky, M. J. , and E. K. Macdonald. 2000. Exploring the link between cause related marketing and brand building. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing5 (1): 46-57.
58.
Polonsky, M. J. , and R. Speed. Forthcoming. Leveraging sponsorship through cause related marketing: Complementarities and conflicts. European Journal of Marketing35 (11/12).
59.
Ptacek, J. J. , and G. Salazar. 1997. Enlightened self-interest: Selling business on the benefits of cause-related marketing. Nonprofit World15 (4): 9-13.
60.
Richards, A.1998. New era for cause link-ups. Marketing, 9 April, 14-14.
61.
Ross, J. K., III , L. T. Patterson, and M. A. Strutts. 1992. Consumer perceptions of organizations that use cause related marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science20 (1): 93-97.
62.
Saiia, D. 1999. Strategic philanthropy: Corporate resources for the public good. Ph.D. diss., University of Georgia.
63.
Sandler, D. M. , and D. Shani. 1993. Sponsorship and the Olympic games: The consumer perspective. Sport Marketing Quarterly2 (3): 38-43.
64.
Schlegelmilch, B. B. , and H. Woodruffe. 1995. A comparative analysis of the affinity card market in the USA and the UK. International Journal of Bank Marketing13 (5): 12-23.
65.
Sharfmann, M.1994. Changing institutional roles: The evolution of corporate philanthropy, 1833-1955. Business and Society33 (3): 236-269.
66.
Shaw, B. , and F. R. Post. 1993. A moral basis for corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics12:745-751.
67.
Smith, C.1994. The new corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review72 (3): 105-116.
68.
Smith, G. , and R. Stodghill II. 1994. Are good causes good marketing?Business Week, 21 March, 64-66.
69.
Smith, S. M. , and D. S. Alcorne. 1991. Cause marketing: A new direction in marketing of corporate responsibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing8 (3): 19-35.
70.
Speed, R. , and P. Thompson. 2000. Determinants of sports sponsorship response. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science38 (2): 226-238.
71.
Spethmann, B.2000. Charity begins at the home page. Promo [Online]. Available: http://www.promomagazine.com/content/features/2000/2000020101.HTM.
72.
Strahilevitz, M. , and J. H. Myers. 1998. Donations to charity as purchase incentives: How well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell. Journal of Consumer Research24 (1): 434-446.
73.
Tonkiss, F. , and A. Passey. 1999. Trust, confidence and voluntary organizations: Between values and institutions. Sociology33 (2): 257-274.
74.
Varadarajan, P. R. , and A. Menon. 1988. Cause-related marketing: A coalignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Marketing52 (3): 58-74.
75.
Wagner, L. , and R. L. Thompson. 1994. Cause-related marketing: Fundraising tool or phony philanthropy?Nonprofit World12 (6): 9-13.
76.
Waugh, L.1997. Cause-related marketing more acceptable than ever. Philanthropy Journal, 3 November, 1-3.
77.
Webb, D. J. , and L. A. Mohr. 1998. A typology of consumer responses to cause-related marketing: From skeptics to socially concerned. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing17 (2): 226-238.
78.
Webb, N. J.1996. Corporate profits and social responsibility: “Subsidization” of corporate income under charitable giving tax laws. Journal of Economics and Business48 (4): 401-422.
79.
Weeden, C.1998. Corporate social investing: New strategies for giving and getting corporation contributions. San Francisco: Brett-Koehler.
80.
Wilkinson, A.1999. Cause for concern. Marketing Week22 (2): 28-31.
81.
Wood, D. J. , and R. E. Jones. 1995. Stakeholder mismatch: A theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Organizational Analysis3 (3): 229-267.
82.
Yablonski, C.1999. Patterns of corporate philanthropy: Passing the share-holder’s buck. Fund Raising Management29 (11): 48-48.
