A General Theory of Competition: Too Eclectic or Not Eclectic Enough? Too Incremental or Not Incremental Enough? Too Neoclassical or Not Neoclassical Enough?
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2000
A General Theory of Competition: Too Eclectic or Not Eclectic Enough? Too Incremental or Not Incremental Enough? Too Neoclassical or Not Neoclassical Enough?
The author thanks Professors Foss, Hodgson, and Savitt for their kind comments on A General Theory of Competition and replies to the questions they have concerning it.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Boland, Lawrence A.1981. On the futility of criticizing the neoclassical maximization hypothesis. American Economic Review71 (December): 1031-1036. (Reprinted in Appraisal and criticism in economics: A book of readings, edited by Bruce J. Caldwell [Boston: Allen & Unwin] and in Critical economic methodology: A personal odyssey, edited by Lawrence A. Boland [London: Routledge Kegan Paul]).
2.
Downie, Jack . 1958. The competitive process. London: Duckworth.
3.
Etzioni, Amitai . 1988. The moral dimension: Toward a new economics. New York: Free Press.
4.
Foss, Nicolai J.2000. The dangers and attractions of theoretical eclecticism. Journal of Macromarketing20 (1): 65-67.
5.
Hodgson, Geoffrey M.2000. The marketing of wisdom: Resource-advantage theory. Journal of Macromarketing20 (1): 68-72.
6.
Hunt, Shelby D.1991. Modern marketing theory: Critical issues in the philosophy of marketing science. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing.
7.
Hunt, Shelby D.1995. The resource-advantage theory of competition: Toward explaining productivity and economic growth. Journal of Management Inquiry4 (December): 317-332.
8.
Hunt, Shelby D.1997a. Competing through relationships: Grounding relationship marketing in resource advantage theory. Journal of Marketing Management13: 431-445.
Hunt, Shelby D.1997c. Resource-advantage theory: An evolutionary theory of competitive firm behavior?Journal of Economic Issues31 (March): 59-77.
11.
Hunt, Shelby D.1997d. Resource-advantage theory and the wealth of nations. Journal of Socio-Economics26 (4): 335-357.
12.
Hunt, Shelby D.1998-1998. Productivity, economic growth, and competition: Resource allocation or resource creation?Business and the Contemporary World10 (3): 367-394.
13.
Hunt, Shelby D.1999. The strategic imperative and sustainable competitive advantage: Public policy and resource advantage theory. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science27 (2): 144-159.
14.
Hunt, Shelby D.2000a. The competence-based, resource-advantage, and neoclassical theories of competition: Toward a synthesis. In Competence-based strategic management: Theory and research, edited by R. Sanchez and A. Heene. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
15.
Hunt, Shelby D.2000b. A general theory of competition: Resources, competences, productivity, economic growth. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
Hunt, Shelby D.2000c. Synthesizing resource-based, evolutionary and neoclassical thought: Resource-advantage theory as a general theory of competition. In Resources, technology, and strategy, edited by N. J. Foss and P. Robertson, 53-79. London: Routledge Kegan.
17.
Paul. B Hunt , Shelby D., and Dale F. Duhan. 2000. Competition in the third millennium: Efficiency or effectiveness?Journal of Business Research.
18.
Hunt, Shelby D. , and C. Jay Lambe. 2000. Marketing’s contribution to business strategy: Market orientation, relationship marketing, and resource-advantage theory. International Journal of Management Reviews2 (1): 17-44.
19.
Hunt, Shelby D. , and Robert M. Morgan. 1995. The comparative advantage theory of competition. Journal of Marketing59 (April): 1-15.
20.
Hunt, Shelby D.1996. The resource-advantage theory of competition: Dynamics, path dependencies, and evolutionary dimensions. Journal of Marketing60 (October): 107-114.
21.
Hunt, Shelby D.1997. Resource-advantage theory: A snake swallowing its tail or a general theory of competition?Journal of Marketing61 (October): 74-82.
22.
Knight, Frank H.1936. The place of marginal economics in a collectivist system. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings26: 255-266.
23.
Nelson, Richard R. , and Sidney G. Winter. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
24.
Richardson, George B.1960. Information and investment. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
25.
Savitt, Ronald . 2000. A philosophical essay about A general theory of competition: Resources, competences, economic growth. Journal of Macromarketing20 (1): 73-76.
26.
Steindl, Joseph . 1952. Maturity and stagnation in American capitalism. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
27.
Veblen, Thorstein B.1919. The place of science in modern civilization and other essays.New York: Huebsch. (Reprinted with a newintroduction by W. J. Samuels [New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1990])