This study uses a survey of 1,135 city managers to evaluate the contemporary city manager role and to evaluate its consistency with principal-agent theory. The findings are mixed. It appears that city councils can control city managers as principal-agent theory suggests, but that most city councils opt for less complex solutions involving trust and role sharing with the city manager. In other words, principal-agent theory does not fully explain the council-manager relationship. In an effort to understand this relationship more thoroughly, this study develops a typology of city manager roles based on the extent of their involvement in policy and the degree of autonomy exercised.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ammons, D. N.
, & Newell, C. (1988). City managers don’t make policy: “A lie; let’s face it.”National Civic Review, 57, 124-132.
2.
Ammons, D. N.
, & Newell, C. (1989). City executives: Leadership roles, work characteristics, and time management. Albany: State University of New York Press.
3.
Bendor, J.
(1990). Formal models of bureaucracy: A review. In N. B. Lynn & A. Wildavsky (Eds.), Public administration: The state of the discipline (pp. 373-417). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
4.
Berman, E. M.
(1997). Getting support from city council: City managers’views. Public Administration and Management: An Interactive Journal [On-line], 2(3). Available: http://www.hbg.psu.edu/faculty/jxr11/97_2_3.html
5.
Eisner, M. A.
, & Meier, K. J. (1990). Presidential control versus bureaucratic power: Explaining the Reagan revolution in antitrust. American Journal of Political Science, 34, 269-287.
6.
Golembiewski, R. T.
, & Gabris, G. T. (1994). Today’s city managers: A legacy of success-becomingfailure. Public Administration Review, 54(6), 525-530.
7.
Golembiewski, R. T.
, & Gabris, G. T. (1995). Tomorrow’s city management: Guides for avoiding success-becoming-failure. Public Administration Review, 55(3), 240-246.
8.
Green, R. E.
(1987). Local government managers: Styles and challenges. Baseline Data Report, 19, 1-11.
9.
Gruber, J. E.
(1987). Controlling bureaucracies: Dilemmas in democratic governance. Berkeley: University of California Press.
10.
Hill, J.
(1985). Why so much stability? The role of agency determined stability. Public Choice, 46, 275-287.
11.
Kahn, R. L.
, Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R. P., & Snoek, J. D. (1964). Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
12.
Krause, G. A.
(1996). The institutional dynamics of policy administration bureaucratic influence over securities regulation. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 1083-1121.
13.
Meier, K. J.
(1993). Politics and the bureaucracy: Policymaking in the fourth branch of government (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
14.
Meier, K. J.
, Wrinkle, R. D., & Polinard, J. L. (1995). Politics, bureaucracy, and agricultural policy: An alternative view of political control. American Politics Quarterly, 23, 427-460.
15.
McCubbins, M.
, Noll, R. G., & Weingast, B. R. (1987). Administrative procedures as instruments of political control. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 3, 243-277.
16.
McCubbins, M.
, Noll, R. G., & Weingast, B. R. (1989). Structure and process as solutions to the politicians principal-agency problem. Virginia Law Review, 74, 431-482.
17.
Moe, T. M.
(1982). Regulatory performance and presidential administration. American Journal of Political Science, 26, 197-224.
18.
Moe, T. M.
(1987). An assessment of the positive theory of “congressional dominance.”Legislative Studies Quarterly, 12, 475-520.
19.
Montjoy, R. S.
, & Watson, D. J. (1995). A case for reinterpreted dichotomy of politics and administration as a professional standard in council-manager government?Public Administration Review, 55(3), 231-239.
20.
Nalbandian, J.
(1989). The contemporary role of city managers. The American Review of Public Administration, 19(4), 261-277.
21.
Nalbandian, J.
(1991). Professionalism in local government: Transformations in the roles, responsibilities, and values of city managers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22.
Pratt, J. W.
, & Zeckhauser, R. J. (Eds.). (1985). Principals and agents: The structure of business. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
23.
Protasel, G. J.
(1988). Abandonments of the council-manager plan: A new institutionalist perspective. Public Administration Review, 48, 807-812.
24.
Redford, E. S.
(1969). Democracy in the administrative state. New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
Ringquist, E. J.
(1995). Political control and policy impact in EPA’s office of water quality. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 336-363.
26.
Romzek, B. S.
(1998). Where the buck stops: Accountability in reformed public organizations. In P. W. Ingraham, J. R. Thompson, & R. P. Sanders (Eds.), Transforming government: Lessons from the reinvention laboratories (pp. 193-219). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27.
Spence, D. B.
(1997). Agency policy making and political control: Modeling away the delegation problem. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7, 199-219.
28.
Stein, R. M.
(1990). Urban alternatives: Public and private markets in the provision of local services. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
29.
Stillman, R. J. II.
(1974). The rise of the city manager. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
30.
Svara, J. H.
(1991). Council and administrator perspectives on the city manager’s role: Conflict, divergence, or congruence?Administration and Society, 23(2), 227-246.
31.
Svara, J. H.
(1998). The politics-administration dichotomy model as aberration. Public Administration Review, 58(1), 51-58.
32.
Teske, P.
, & Schneider, M. (1994). The bureaucratic entrepreneur: The case of city managers. Public Administration Review, 54, 331-340.
33.
Weingast, B. R.
(1984). The congressional-bureaucratic system: Principal agent perspective. Public Choice, 44, 147-191.
34.
Weingast, B. R.
, & Moran, M. F. (1983). Bureaucratic discretion or congressional control? Regulatory policymaking by the federal trade commission. Journal of Political Economy, 91, 765-800.
35.
Wheeler, C. M.
(1994). Identity and excellence: Role models for city managers. Administration and Society, 26, 281-305.
36.
White, H. C.
(1985). Agency as control. In J. W. Pratt & R. J. Zeckhauser (Eds.), Principals and agents: The structure of business (pp. 187-212). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
37.
Wood, B. D.
(1988). Principals, bureaucrats, and responsiveness in clean air enforcements. American Political Science Review, 82, 213-234.
38.
Wood, B. D.
, & Waterman, R. W. (1991). The dynamics of political control of the bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 85(3), 801-850.
39.
Wood, B. D.
, & Waterman, R. W. (1993). The dynamics of political-bureaucratic adaption. American Journal of Political Science, 37(2), 497-529.
40.
Wood, B. D.
, & Waterman, R. W. (1994). Bureaucratic discretion: The role of bureaucracy in a democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview.
41.
Woodruff, C. R.
(Ed.). (1919). A new municipal program. New York: D. Appleton.
