The public sector faces increasing demands to run government like a business, importing privatesector concepts such as entrepreneurism, privatization, treating the citizen like a “customer,” and management techniques derived from the production process. The idea that government should mimic the market is not new in American public administration, but the current situation is particularly intense. The new public management seeks to emphasize efficient, instrumental implementation of policies, removing substantive policy questions from the administrative realm. This revival of the politics-administration dichotomy threatens core public-sector values of citizen selfgovernance and the administrator as servant of the public interest. The article examines the political culture that encourages expansion of market-like practices in the American public sector, explores the issues of the purpose and scope of government and the role of the public-service practitioner, and offers a framework for the study and practice of public administration based on citizenship and public service.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, G. B.
, Bowerman, P. V., Dolbeare, K. M., & Stivers, C. (1990). Joining purpose to practice: A democratic identity for the public service. In H.D. Kass & B.L. Catron (Eds.), Images and identities in public administration (pp. 219-240). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Anderson, T. T.
, & Crawford, R. G. (1998). Unsettling the metaphysics of neo-classical micro-economic and management thinking. International Journal of Public Administration, 21, 645-690.
3.
Arnold, P. E.
(1995). Reform’s changing role. Public Administration Review, 55, 407-417.
4.
Barber, B. R.
(1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5.
Barber, B. R.
(1998). A place for us: How to make society civil and democracy strong. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
6.
Barrett, K.
, & Greene, R. (1998, March). Customer disorientation. Governing, 11, 62.
7.
Bellah, R. N.
, Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (1985). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. New York: Harper & Row.
8.
Bellone, C. J.
, & Goerl, G. F. (1993). In defense of civic-regarding entrepreneurship or helping wolves to promote good citizenship. Public Administration Review, 53, 396-398.
9.
Bowles, S.
, & Gintis, H. (1986). Democracy and capitalism: Property, community, and the contradictions of modern social thought. New York: Basic Books.
10.
Box, R. C.
(1998). Citizen governance: Leading American communities into the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
Campbell, J.
(1996). Understanding John Dewey: Nature and cooperative intelligence. Chicago: Open Court Publishing.
12.
Cheung, A.B.L.
(1997). The rise of privatization policies: Similar faces, diverse motives. International Journal of Public Administration, 20, 2213-2245.
13.
Cohn, D.
(1997). Creating crises and avoiding blame: The politics of public service reform and the new public management in Great Britain and the United States. Administration and Society, 29, 584-616.
14.
Cope, G. H.
(1997). Bureaucratic reform and issues of political responsiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7, 461-471.
15.
Downs, A.
(1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
16.
Dryzek, J. S.
(1996). Democracy in capitalist times: Ideals, limits, and struggles. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17.
Eberly, D. E.
(1994). Building a community of citizens: Civil society in the 21st century. New York: University Press of America.
18.
Eisenhardt, K. M.
(1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14, 57-74.
19.
Fox, C. J.
, & Miller, H. T. (1995). Postmodern public administration: Toward discourse. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
Gerth, H. H.
, & Mills, C.W. (1958). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
Giddens, A.
(1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
22.
Golembiewski, R. T.
(1977). A critique of “democratic administration” and its supporting ideation. American Political Science Review, 71, 1488-1507.
23.
Hood, C.
(1996). Beyond “progressivism”: A new “global paradigm” in public management?International Journal of Public Administration, 19, 151-177.
24.
Hummel, R.
, & Stivers, C. (1998). Government isn’t us: The possibility of democratic knowledge in representative government. In C. K. King & C. Stivers (Eds.), Government is us: Public administration in an anti-government era (pp. 28-48). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Jennings, E. T., Jr.
(1991). Public choice and the privatization of government: Implications for public administration. In J. S. Ott, A .C. Hyde, & J. M. Shafritz (Eds.), Public management: The essential readings (pp. 113-129). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
26.
Johnson, D. B.
(1991). Public choice: An introduction to the new political economy. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
27.
Kamensky, J. M.
(1996). Role of the “reinventing government” movement in federal management reform. Public Administration Review, 56, 247-255.
28.
Kaplan, R. D.
(1997, December). Was democracy just a moment?Atlantic Monthly, 280, 55-80.
29.
Kass, H. D.
, & Catron, B. L. (1990). Images and identities in public administration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30.
Kelly, R. M.
(1998). An inclusive democratic polity, representative bureaucracies, and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 58, 201-208.
31.
Kettl, D. F.
(1997). The global revolution in public management: Driving themes, missing links. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 16, 446-462.
32.
King, C. S.
, & Stivers, C. (1998a). Government is us: Public administration in an anti-government era. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
King, C. S.
, & Stivers, C. (1998b). Introduction: The anti-government era. In C. S. King & C. Stivers (Eds.), Government is us: Public administration in an anti-government era (pp. 3-18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
Lan, Z.
, & Rosenbloom, D. H. (1992). Public administration in transition?Public Administration Review, 52, 535-537.
35.
Lasch, C.
(1996). The revolt of the elites and the betrayal of democracy. New York: Norton.
36.
Lynn, L. E., Jr.
(1998). The new public management: How to transform a theme into a legacy. Public Administration Review, 58, 231-237.
37.
Lyons, W. E.
, & Lowery, D. (1989). Governmental fragmentation versus consolidation: Five publicchoice myths about how to create informed, involved, and happy citizens. Public Administration Review, 49, 533-543,
38.
March, J. G.
(1992). The war is over, the victors have lost. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2, 225-231.
39.
McSwite, O. C.
(1997). Legitimacy in public administration: A discourse analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
Mikesell, J. A.
(1995). Fiscal administration: Analysis and applications for the public sector (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
41.
Moe, T. M.
(1984). The new economics of organization. American Journal of Political Science, 28, 739-777.
42.
Niskanen, W. A.
(1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldine Atherton.
43.
Niskanen, W. A.
(1991). A reflection on bureaucracy and representative government. In A. Blais & S. Dion (Eds.), The budget-maximizing bureaucrat: Appraisals and evidence (pp. 13-31). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
44.
Olson, M.
(1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45.
Osborne, D.
, & Gaebler, T. (1993). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. New York: Penguin.
46.
Ostrom, V.
(1977). Some problems in doing political theory: A response to Golembiewski’s “critique.”American Political Science Review, 71, 1508-1525.
47.
Ostrom, V.
(1991). The intellectual crisis in American public administration. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press. (Original work published 1973)
48.
Ostrom, V.
(1994). The meaning of American federalism: Constituting a self-governing society. San Francisco: ICS. (Original work published 1991)
49.
Peters, B. G.
, & Pierre, J. (1998). Governance without government? Rethinking public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8, 223-243.
50.
Phares, D.
(1989). Bigger is better, or is it smaller?Urban Affairs Quarterly, 25, 5-17.
51.
Public Administration Review
. (1993). Forum on public administration and the Constitution. Public Administration Review, 53, 237-267.
52.
Ramos, A. G.
(1984). The new science of organizations: A reconceptualization of the wealth of nations. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press. (Original work published 1981)
53.
Ross, B. H.
, & Levine, M. A. (1996). Urban politics: Power in metropolitan America (5th ed.). Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.
54.
Savas, E. S.
(1987). Privatization: The key to better government. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
55.
Schachter, H. L.
(1997). Reinventing government or reinventing ourselves: The role of citizen owners in making a better government. Albany: State University of New York Press.
56.
Schmidtz, D.
(1991). The limits of government: An essay on the public goods argument. Boulder, CO: Westview.
57.
Scott, W. G.
, & Hart, D. K. (1979). Organizational America. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
58.
Simon, H. A.
(1997). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1945)
59.
Skowronek, S.
(1982). Building a new American state: The expansion of national administrative capacities, 1877-1920. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
60.
Stillman, R. J. II
(1991). Preface to public administration: A search for themes and direction. New York: St. Martin’s.
61.
Terry, L. D.
(1993). Why we should abandon the misconceived quest to reconcile public entrepreneurship with democracy. Public Administration Review, 53, 393-395.
62.
Terry, L. D.
(1998). Administrative leadership, neo-managerialism, and the public management movement. Public Administration Review, 58, 194-200.
63.
Timney, M. M.
(1998). Overcoming administrative barriers to citizen participation: Citizens as partners, not adversaries. In C. S. King & C. Stivers (Eds.), Government is us: Public administration in an anti-government era (pp. 88-101). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64.
Waldo, D.
(1981). The enterprise of public administration: A summary view. Novato, CA: Chandler & Sharp.
65.
Walters, J.
(1998, February). Did somebody say downsizing?Governing, 11, 17-20.
66.
Waterman, R. W.
, & Meier, K. J. (1998). Principal-agent models: An expansion?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8, 173-202.
67.
Weintraub, J.
(1997). Public/private: The limitations of a grand dichotomy. Responsive Community, 7, 13-24.
68.
White, L. D.
(1954). The Jacksonians: A study in administrative history, 1829-1861. New York: Macmillan.
69.
Wood, E. M.
(1996). Democracy against capitalism: Renewing historical materialism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
70.
Yankelovich, D.
(1991). Coming to public judgment: Making democracy work in a complex world. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
