All public organizations face conflicting goals that in theory require trade-offs. Using data from school systems, this article argues that good organizations may be able to attain more than one goal simultaneously. The research uses a substantively weighted analytical technique1to determine how organizations concerned with equity also meet demands for effectiveness. The best organizations do this through a more efficient translation of inputs into outputs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anyon, J.
(1995). Race, social class and educational reform in an inner-city school. Teachers College Record, 97(2), 69-94.
2.
Burtless, G.
(1996). Does money matter? The effect of school resources on student achievement and adult success. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
3.
Downs, A.
(1967). Inside bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown.
4.
Evans, W. N.
, Murray, S. E., & Schwab, R. M. (1997). Schoolhouses, courthouses, and statehouses after Serrano. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 16(1), 10-31.
5.
Frederickson, H. G.
(1997). The spirit of public administration. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Fuller, B.
, Eggers-Pierola, C., Holloway, S. D., Liang, X., & Rambaud, M. F. (1996). Rich culture, poor markets: Why do Latino parents forego preschooling?Teachers College Record, 97(4), 400-418.
7.
Garaway, G. B.
(1995). The equity/excellence dialectic: Pluralism and the impact of educational reform. Equity & Excellence in Education, 28(1), 65-72.
8.
Gill, J.
(1997). Generalized substantively reweighted least squares regression. Political Methodology. http://wizard.ucr.edu/polmeth/working_papers97.
9.
Goodsell, C. T.
(1989). Balancing competing values. In J. Perry (Ed.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 575-584). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10.
Hanushek, E. A.
(1989). Expenditures, efficiency, and equity in education: The federal government’s role. American Economic Review, 79(1), 46-51.
11.
Hanushek, E. A.
(1996). School resources and student performance. In G. Burtless (Ed.), Does money matter? The effect of school resources on student achievement and adult success (pp. 43-73). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
12.
Hanushek, E. A.
, & Pace, R. R. (1995). Who chooses to teach (and why)?Economics of Education Review, 14(1), 107-117.
13.
Hedges, L. V.
, & Greenwald, R. (1996). Have times changed? The relation between school resources and student performance. In G. Burtless (Ed.), Does money matter? The effect of school resources on student achievement and adult success (pp. 74-96). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
14.
Katz, D.
, & Kahn, R. L. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. New York: John Wiley.
15.
Katz, M. B.
(1992). Chicago school reform as history. Teachers College Record, 94(4), 56-72.
16.
Meier, K. J.
, & Keiser, L. R. (1996). Public administration as a science of the artificial: A methodology for prescription. Public Administration Review, 56(5), 459-466.
17.
Meier, K. J.
, & Stewart, J., Jr. (1991). The politics of Hispanic education. Albany: State University of New York Press.
18.
Meier, K. J.
, & Stewart, J., Jr. (1992). Active representation in educational bureaucracies: Policy impacts. The American Review of Public Administration, 22(3), 157-171.
19.
Murphy, J.
(1989). Is there equity in educational reform?Educational Leadership, 46(1), 32-33.
20.
Murray, S. E. (1995.) Two essays on the distribution of education resources and outcomes. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Economics, University of Maryland.
21.
Necochea, J.
, & Cune, Z. (1996). A case study of within district school funding inequities. Equity & Excellence in Education, 29(4), 69-77.
22.
Oakes, J.
(1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23.
Okun, A.
(1976). Equality versus efficiency: The big tradeoff. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
24.
Perrow, C.
(1970). Organizational analysis: A sociological view. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
25.
Polinard, J. L.
, Wrinkle, R. D., Longoria, T., & Binder, N. E. (1994). Electoral structure and urban policy: The impact on Mexican American communities. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
26.
Polinard, J. L.
, Wrinkle, R. D., & Meier, K. J. (1995). The influence of educational and political resources on minority students. Journal of Negro Education, 64(4), 463-474.
27.
Rainey, H. G.
(1997). Understanding and managing public organizations (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28.
Simon, H. A.
(1957). Administrative behavior (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.
29.
Smith, K. B.
, & Meier, K. J. (1994). Bureaucrats, markets and schools. Public Administration Review, 54(4), 511-558.
30.
Theilemann, G. S.
, & Stewart, J., Jr. (1996). A demand side perspective on the importance of representative bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 56(2), 168-173.
31.
Thompson, F. J.
(1976). Minority groups in public bureaucracies. Administration and Society, 8(2), 201-226.
32.
Thompson, J. D.
(1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
33.
Tyack, D. B.
(1974). The one best system: A history of American urban education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
Waller, G.
(1998). For the want of a modem and a comfortable chair: School facilities and state education performance. American Journal of Political Science, 42(2), 705-708.
