This article discusses the political and administrative ideas of Frederick the Great, as expressed in his writings, and attempts to assess their significance for American public administration thinking. Frederick's ideas on enlightened government, the good of the state, and the role of public administration are examined here. It is argued that the ideas espoused by Frederick have been influential in American public administration thinking about the role of public administration and the nature of the state.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barker, J. E.
(1916). The foundations of Germany: A documentary account revealing the causes of her strength, wealth and efficiency. New York: E. P. Dutton.
2.
Behn, R. D.
(1995). The big questions of public management. Public Administration Review, 55(4), 313-324.
3.
Beloff, M.
(1962). The age of absolutism: 1660-1815. New York: Harper & Row.
4.
Bluntschli, J. K.
(1895). The theory of the state. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
5.
Carey, H. C.
(1967). The unity of law. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.
6.
Finer, H.
(1941). Administrative responsibility in democratic government. Public Administration Review, 1, 335-350.
7.
Frederick II
, King of Prussia (1789). The posthumous works of Frederick the Great (T. Holcroft, Trans.). London: G.G.J. & J. Robinson.
8.
Frederick II
, King of Prussia. (1966). Frederick the Great on the art of war (J. Luvaas, Ed. & Trans.). New York: Free Press.
9.
Frederick of Prussia
. (1981). Anti-Machiavel (P. Sonnino, Trans.). Athens: Ohio University Press.
10.
Friedrich, C.
(1940). Public policy and the nature of administrative responsibility. In C. Friedrich (Ed.), Public policy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
Gooch, G. P.
(1990). Frederick the Great: The ruler, the writer, the man. New York: Dorset.
12.
Gore, A.
(1995). Common sense government. New York: Random House.
13.
Gulick, L.
(1937). Notes on the theory of organization. In L. Gulick & L. Urwick (Eds.), Papers on the science of administration. New York: Institute of Public Administration.
14.
Hegel, G. W.
(1952). Hegel's philosophy of right (T. M. Knox, Trans.). New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
Hegel, G. W.
(1956). The philosophy of history (J. Sibree, Trans.). New York: Dover.
16.
Hegel, G. W.
(1983). Hegel's lectures on the history of philosophy. Volume 2 (E. S. Haldane & F. H. Simson, Trans.). Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities.
17.
Kant, I.
(1949). The philosophy of Kant. New York: Modern Library.
18.
Meier, K. J.
(1997). Bureaucracy and democracy: The case for more bureaucracy and less democracy. Public Administration Review, 57(3), 193-199.
19.
Meinecke, F.
(1962). Machiavellism (D. Scott, Trans.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20.
Mitford, N.
(1995). Frederick the Great. New York: Penguin.
21.
Oakeshott, M.
(1975). On human conduct. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
22.
Parry, G.
(1963). Enlightened government and its critics in eighteenth-century Germany. The Historical Journal, 6(2), 178-192.
23.
Ritter, G.
(1968). Frederick the Great: A historical profile (P. Paret, Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
24.
Rosenberg, H.
(1966). Bureaucracy, aristocracy, and autocracy: The Prussian experience, 1660-1815. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
Saint-Simon, Henri de
. (1964). Social organization, the science of man, and other writings (Felix Markham, Ed. & Trans.). New York: Harper Torchbooks.
26.
Schmoller, G.
(1989). The mercantile system and its historical significance. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.
27.
Smith, P.
(1962). The enlightenment 1687-1776. New York: Collier.
28.
Spicer, M. W.
(1995). The founders, the Constitution, and public administration: A conflict in world-views. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
29.
Spicer, M. W.
(1997). Public administration, the state, and the postmodern condition: A constitutionalist perspective. American Behavioral Scientist, 41(1), 90-102.
30.
White, L. D.
(1926). Introduction to the study of public administration. New York: Macmillan
31.
Wilson, W.
(1887). The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2(2), 197-222.
