This article examines how gender informed the construction of the federal government's merit-based civil service during the 1930s. Specifically, itfocuses on the debate over the employment of married women in the civil service as outlined in section 213 of the Economy Act. Many women found the measure discriminatory and developed a wide variety of arguments to dispute it. Nevertheless, opponents of section 213 incorporated, rather than rejected, the notion that women and men inhabited distinct social roles. Hence, many within the civil service continued to argue that women were not well suited for most high-level, well-paying positions. As this case study suggests, more recent debates over affirmative action and worthiness with respect to job placement fail to recognize the cultural biases that have and will continue to inform the meaning of merit.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Appleby, P., to Bulow, W. (1940, September 28). In RG 16, Office of Secretary, Box 129, Personnel, August 23-November 15. Washington, DC: National Archives and Records Administration.
2.
Bernstein, C.
(1989). Loyalties: A son's memoirs. New York: Simon & Schuster.
3.
Caldwell, D., to Stanley. (1933, August 8). In Official Files 252, Government Employees, April-June 1933. Hyde Park, NY: Franklin D. Roosevelt Library.
4.
Camp, M. W., to Howe, L. (1933, July 14). In Official Files 252, Government Employees, April-July, 1933. Hyde Park, NY: Franklin D. Roosevelt Library.
5.
Coleman, E., to Roosevelt, F. D. (1933, April 25). In Official Files 252, Government Employees, April-July 1933. Hyde Park, NY: Franklin D. Roosevelt Library.
Council of Personnel Administration. (1939, December 7). Meeting transcript in RG 146, Federal Personnel Council Meetings, Box 4. Washington, DC: National Archives and Records Administration.
8.
Duerst-Lahti, G.
, & Johnson, C. M. (1992). Management styles, stereotypes, and advantages. In M. E. Guy (Ed.), Men and women of the states: Public administrators at the state level (pp. 125-156). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
9.
Duke, L. L.
(1992). Career development and affirmative action. In M. E. Guy (Ed.), Men and women of the states: Public administrators at the state level (pp. 19-41). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Economy Act. (1933). Pub. L. No. 2,4,48 Stat. 14 (1934).
12.
Federal Security Agency. (1941, September 4.) Employee relations policy. In the papers of William McReynolds, Box 18, Federal Security Agency, Executive and Judiciary Departments (Agencies). Hyde Park, NY: Franklin D. Roosevelt Library.
13.
Ferguson, K. E.
(1984). The feminist case against bureaucracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
14.
Gladmon, P. L., to Matasoff, L. (1937a, February 26). In RG 16, Office of Secretary, Box 2606, Personnel, January-July [3 of 3]. Washington, DC: National Archives and Records Administration.
15.
Gladmon, P. L., to Tolley, H. R. (1937b, February 17). In RG 16, Office of Secretary, Box 2606, Personnel, January-July [3 of 3]. Washington, DC: National Archives and Records Administration.
16.
Guy, M. E.
(Ed.). (1992). Men and women of the states: Public administrators at the state level. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
17.
Guy, M. E.
, & Duerst-Lahti, G. (1992). Agency culture and its effect on managers. In M. E. Guy (Ed.), Men and women of the states: Public administrators at the state level (pp. 157-188). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
18.
Harvey, T. W., to Gladmon, P. L. (1937, February 23). In RG 16, Office of Secretary, Box 2606, Personnel, January-July [3 of 3]. Washington, DC: National Archives and Records Administration.
19.
The history of section 213. (1935, November 9). In RG 86, Women's Bureau division of research, unpublished studies and materials, 1919-1972, Box 17, Effects of Dismissing Married Women 1936, Married Women's Employment, 1935. Washington, DC: National Archives and Records Administration.
20.
Hobbs, M.
(1993). Rethinking antifeminism in the 1930s: Gender crisis or work place justice? A response to Alice Kessler-Harris. Gender and History, 5, 4-15.
21.
Kanter, R. M.
(1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic.
22.
Kessler-Harris, A.
(1989). Gender ideology in historical reconstruction: A case study from the 1930s. Gender and History, 1, 31-49.
23.
Kessler-Harris, A.
(1993). Reply to Hobbs. Gender and History, 5, 16-19.
24.
Klein, E., to Bernhardt, J. (1937, February 4). In RG 16, Office of Secretary, Box 2606, Personnel, January-July [3 of 3]. Washington, DC: National Archives and Records Administration.
25.
Kwolek-Folland, A.
(1994). Engendering business: Men and women in the corporate office, 1870-1930. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
26.
Lunbeck, E.
(1994). The psychiatric persuasion: Knowledge, gender and power in modem America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
Marital status act scored by 12
. (1935, April 18). Washington Evening Star, p. B-1.
28.
Marital status change defended
. (1935, April 25). Washington Evening Star, p. A-2.
29.
Marriage law seems likely to be repealed
. (1935, May 3). Government Standard, 6 (11).
30.
Married person's clause hit in bill
. (1935, March 7). Washington Evening Star, p. B-i.
31.
Married worker's ban seen invading emergency units
. (1935, April 19). Washington Evening Star, p. B-1.
32.
Matasoff, L., to Appleby, P. (1937a, January 27). In RG 16, Office of Secretary, Box 2606, Personnel, January-July [3 of 3]. Washington, DC: National Archives and Records Administration.
33.
Matasoff, L., to Stockberger, W. (1937b, February 8). In RG 16, Office of Secretary, Box 2606, Personnel, January-July [3 of 3]. Washington, DC: National Archives and Records Administration.
34.
National Labor Relations Board. (1934, August 10). Hearing transcript in RG 25, Case No. 39, New Series, Donovan, John L. Washington, DC: National Archives and Records Administration.
35.
Nevin, J.
, & Nevin, L. (1976). AFGE-federal union: The story of the AFGE. Washington, DC: American Federation of Government Employees.
36.
Patterson, E., to Roosevelt, F. D. (n.d.). In Official Files 252, Government Employees, January-June 1935. Hyde Park, NY: Franklin D. Roosevelt Library.
37.
Roosevelt, F. D. (1933). Papers of Franklin D. Roosevelt, Official File 252, Government Employees, April-July 1933, Hyde Park, NY: Franklin D. Roosevelt Library.
38.
Scharf, L.
(1980). To work and to wed: Female employment, feminism, and the Great Depression. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
39.
Sealander, J.
(1983). As minority becomes majority: Federal reaction to the phenomenon of women in the workforce, 1920-1963. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
40.
Stivers, C.
(1993). Gender images in public administration: Legitimacy and the administrative state. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41.
Strom, S. H.
(1992). Beyond the typewriter: Gender; class and the origins of modern office work. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
42.
U.S. Department of Justice
. (1908). Official opinions of the attorney-general of the United States advising the president and heads of departments in relation to their official duties, 26. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
43.
Weiner, L.
(1985). From working girl to working mother. The female labor force in the United States, 1820-1980. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
44.
Wickard, C., to Bulow, W. (1940, August 14). In RG 16, Office of Secretary, Box 129, Personnel, August 23-November 15. Washington, DC: National Archives and Records Administration.
45.
Women's Bureau, U.S. Department of Labor. (1935). A preliminary study of the application of section 213 of the Economy Act of June 30, 1932. In Official Files 252, Government Employees, January-June 1935. Hyde Park, NY: Franklin D. Roosevelt Library.
46.
Women's Bureau, U.S. Department of Labor
. (1941). Employment of women in the federal government, 1923-1939 (Bulletin No. 182). Washington, DC: Author.
47.
Women's Bureau, U.S. Department of Labor
. (1949). Women in the federal service, 1923-1947: Part n Trends in employment (Bulletin No. 230-1) Washington, DC: Author.
48.
Women's right to work upheld
. (1935, September 28). Washington Evening Star, p. A-16.
