Austin, G. R.
(1978). Process evaluation: A comprehensive study of outliers. Baltimore, MD: Maryland State Department of Education.
2.
Bimber, B.
(1993). School decentralization: Lessons from the study of bureaucracy. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
3.
Carnoy, M.
(1993). School improvement: Is privatization the answer? In J. Hannaway & M. Carnoy (Eds.), Decentralization and school improvement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4.
Chubb, J. E.
, & Moe, T. M. (1990a). Politics, markets, and America's schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
5.
Chubb, J. E.
, & Moe, T. M. (1990b). Choice is a panacea. Brookings Review, (Summer), 4-12.
6.
Chubb, J. E.
, & Moe, T. M. (1993). The forest and the trees: A response to our critics. In E. Rasell & R. Rothstein (Eds.), School choice (pp. 219-240). Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
7.
Cohen, D.
(1990). Governance and instruction: The promise of decentralization and choice. In W. H. Clune & J. F. Witte (Eds.), Choice and control in American education, Vol. 1: The theory of choice and control in American education. New York: Falmer.
8.
Cohen, M.
(1988). Restructuring the education system: Agenda for the 1990s. Washington, DC: Center for Policy Research, National Governors' Association.
9.
Edmonds, R. R.
(1979). Some schools work and more can. Social Policy, 9, 28-32.
10.
Edmonds, R. R.
(1981). Making public schools effective. Social Policy, 12, 56-60.
11.
Espinola, V.
(1991). Decentralization of the education system in Chile. Santiago: Centro de Investigacion de Desarollo de la Educacion (CIDE).
12.
Friedman, M.
(1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Hannaway, J.
, & Carnoy, M. (1993). Decentralization and school improvement: Can we fulfill the promise?San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
Henig, J. R.
(1994). Rethinking school choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
Hill, P. T.
, & Bonan, J. (1991). Decentralization and accountability in public education. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
16.
Krug, S. E.
(1993, November). Leadership craft and the crafting of school leaders. Phi Delta Kappa, pp. 240-244.
17.
Lugg, C. A.
, & Boyd, W. L. (1993, November). Leadership for collaboration: Reducingrisk and fostering resilience. Phi Delta Kappan, pp. 253-258.
18.
Murnane, R. J.
(1981). Interpreting the evidence on school effectiveness. Teachers College Record, 83, 19-35.
19.
Parry, T. R.
(1996). Will pursuit of higher quality sacrifice equal opportunity in education? An analysis of the education voucher system in Santiago. Social Science Quarterly, (December).
20.
Parry, T. R.
(1997a). Achieving balance in decentralization: The implementation of an education voucher system in Chile. World Development, (February).
21.
Parry, T. R.
(1997b). Decentralization and privatization: Some lessons from Chile. Journal of Public Policy, 17(1).
22.
Parry, T. R.
(1997c). Theory meets reality in the education voucher debate. Education Economics.
23.
Purkey, S. C.
, & Smith, M. S. (1983). Effective schools: A review. Elementary School Journal, 83(4), 427-452.
24.
Spartz, J. L.
, Valdez, A. L., McCormick, W. J., Myers, J., & Geppert, W. J. (1977). Delaware education accountability system case studies: Elementary schools grades 1-4. Dover, DE: Delaware Department of Public Instruction.
25.
Tomlinson, T. M.
(1980, May). Student ability, student background and student achievement: Another look at life in effective schools. Paper presented at Educational Testing Service Conference on Effective Schools, New York.
26.
Trisman, D. A.
, Waller, M. I., & Wilder, C. A. (1976). A descriptive and analytic study of compensatory reading programs: Final report. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
27.
Winkler, D.
(1990). Education decentralization. Washington, DC: World Bank.
28.
Wise, A. E.
, & Darling-Hammond, L. (1983). Educational vouchers: Regulating their efficiency and effectiveness. Educational Researcher, 12(9), 9-18.
