This paper describes the development, implementation and evaluation of a successful performance appraisal system for probationary police officers for a medium-sized (330,000) Mid-Atlantic city. The case study summarizes the factors that contributed to the adoption of the performance appraisal system and the elements that contributed to the system's effectiveness. These factors include significant user participation in the system's development; thorough rater training; a clear articulation of the system's rationale, goals, and objectives; a rating format that is compatible with the organization's culture and congruent with the objectives of the appraisal system.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ammons, D. N.
(1987). Executive satisfaction with managerial performance appraisal in city government. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 8, 33-48.
2.
Ammons, D. N.
, & Rodriguez, A. (1986). Performance appraisal practices for upper management in city governments. Public Administration Review, 46, 460-467.
3.
Balzer, W. K.
, & Sulsky, L. M. (1992). Halo and performance appraisal research: A critical examination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 975-985.
4.
Bernardin, H. J.
, & Beatty R. W. (1984). Performance appraisal: Assessing human behavior at work. Boston: Kent Publishing Company.
5.
Bernardin, H. J.
, & Orban, J. A. (1990). Leniency effect as a function of rating format, purpose for appraisal, and rater individual differences. Journal of Business and Psychology, 5, 197-211.
6.
Bowman, J. S.
(1994). At last, an alternative to performance appraisal: Total quality management. Public Administration Review, 54, 129-136.
7.
Burke, R. J.
, Weitzel, W., & Weir, T. (1978). Characteristics of effective employee performance reviews and development interviews: Replication and extension. Personnel Psychology, 31, 903-919.
8.
Cardy, R. L.
, & Dobbins, G. H. (1993). Performance appraisal: Alternative perspectives. Cincinnati: South-Western Publishing Co.
9.
Carroll, S. J.
, & Schneier, C. E. (1982). Performance and review systems: The identification, measurement, development of performance in organizations. Dallas: Scott, Foresman and Company.
10.
Daley, D.
(1992). Performance appraisal in the public sector. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
11.
Deming, W. E.
(1986). Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study.
12.
Dipboye, R. L.
, & dePontbriand. (1981). Correlates of employee reactions to performance appraisals and appraisal systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 248-251.
13.
England, R. E.
, & Parle, W. M. (1987). Nonmanagerial performance appraisal practices in large American cities. Public Administration Review, 47, 498-504.
14.
Feldman, J.
(1981). Beyond attribution theory: Cognitive processes in performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 127-148.
15.
Feldman, J. M.
(1986). Instrumentation and training for performance appraisal: A perceptual-cognitive viewpoint. In K. M. Rowlan & G. R.. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (voL 4 pp. 45-99). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
16.
Fox, C. J.
(1991). Employee performance appraisal: The keystone made of clay. In C. Ban & N. M. Riccucci (Eds.), Public personnel management: Current concerns-future challenges. New York: Longman.
17.
Gabris, G.
, Mitchell, K., & McLemore, R. (1985). Rewarding individual and team productivity. The Biloxi merit bonus plan. Public Personnel Management, 14, 231-245.
18.
Harris, M. M.
(1994). Rater motivation in the performance appraisal context: A theoretical framework. Journal of Management, 20, 737-756.
19.
Harris, M. M.
, Smith, D. E., & Champagne, D. (1995). A field study of performance appraisal purposes: Research versus administrative-based ratings. Personnel Psychology, 48, 151-160.
20.
Hartel, C. E.
(1993). Rating format research revisited: Format effectiveness and acceptability depend on rater characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 212-217.
21.
Hillery, J. M.
, & Wexley, K. N. (1974). Participation effects in appraisal interviews conducted in a training situation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 168-171.
22.
Ilgen, D. R.
, & Feldman, J. M. (1983). Performance appraisal: A process focus. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: Vol. 5. (pp. 141-197). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
23.
Ilgen, D. R.
, Barnes-Farrell, J. L., & McKellin, D. B. (1993). Performance appraisal process research in the 1980s: What has it contributed to appraisals in use?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 54, 321-368.
24.
Ilgen, D. R.
, Fisher, C. D., & Taylor, S. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 349-371.
25.
Ivancevich, J. M.
, & Matteson, M. T. (1993). Organizational behavior and management. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
26.
Joiner, B. L.
(1994). Fourth generation management: The new business consciousness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
27.
Klein, H. J.
, & Snell, S. A. (1994). The impact of interview process and context on performance appraisal interview effectiveness. Journal of Managerial Issues, 6, 160-175.
28.
Klingner, D. E.
, & Nalbandian, J. (1993). Public personnel management: Contexts and strategies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
29.
Lacho, K. J.
, Stearns, G. K., & Whelan, R. (1991). Performance appraisal in local government: A current update. Public Productivity and Management Review, 14, 281-296.
30.
Latham, G. P.
, & Wexley, K. N. (1981). Increasing productivity through performance appraisal. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
31.
Longenecker, C. O.
, & Gioia, D. A. (1994). The politics of executive appraisals. Journal of Compensation & Benefits, 10, 5-11.
32.
Lovrich, N. P.
, Shaffer, P. L., Hopkins, R. H., & Yale, D. A. (1981). Participative performance appraisal effects upon job satisfaction, agency climate, and work values: Results of a quasi-experimental study in six state agencies. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 1, 51-73.
33.
Lovrich, N.
, Shaffer, P., Yale, D., & Hopkins, R. (1980). Do public servants welcome or fear merit evaluation of their performance?Public Administration Review, 40, 214-222.
34.
Maurer, T. J.
, & Taylor, M. A. (1994). Is sex by itself enough? An explanation of gender bias issues in performance appraisal. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60, 231-251.
35.
Mohrman, A. M.
, Resnick-West, S. M., & Lawler, E. E. (1989). Designing performance appraisal systems. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco.
36.
Murphy, K. R.
, & Cleveland, J. N. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational and goal-based perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
Nathan, B. R.
, Mohrman, A. M., & Milliman, J. F. (1991). Interpersonal relations as a context for the effects of appraisal interviews on performance and satisfaction: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 352-369.
38.
Nemeroff, W. F.
, & Wexley, K. N. (1977). Relationships between performance appraisal interview characteristics and interview outcomes as perceived by supervisors and subordinates. Paper presented at the 1977 Academy of Management Meeting, Orlando, FL.
39.
Roberts, G. E.
(1992). Linkages between performance appraisal system effectiveness and rater and ratee acceptance: Evidence from a survey of municipal personnel administrators. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 12(3), 19-41.
40.
Roberts, G. E.
(1994). Barriers to municipal government performance appraisal systems: Evidence from a survey of municipal personnel administrators. Public Personnel Management, 23, 225-236.
41.
Roberts, G. E.
(1995a). Developmental performance appraisal in municipal government: An antidote for a deadly disease?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 15, 17-43.
42.
Roberts, G. E.
(1995b). Municipal government performance appraisal system practices: Is the whole less than the sum of its parts?Public Personnel Management, 24, 197-221.
43.
Roush, D. L.
, Curtis, C., Dershem, H. A., & Lovrich, N. (1991). The development of behavioral-based performance appraisal process in smaller local governments: Lessons from a case study. Public Productivity and Management Review, 14, 267-279.
44.
Silverman, S. B.
, & Wexley, K. N. (1984). Reaction employees have to performance appraisal interview as a function of their participation in rating scale development. Personnel Psychology, 37, 703-710.
45.
Thayer, F.
(1987). Performance appraisal and merit pay systems. The disasters multiply. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 7, 36-53.
46.
Thomas, S. L.
, & Bretz, R. D., Jr. (1994). Research and practice in performance appraisal: Evaluating employee performance in America's largest companies. Advanced Management Journal, 59, 28-34.
47.
Tziner, A.
, Kopelman, R. E., & Livneh, N. (1993). Effects of performance format on perceived goal characteristics, appraisal process satisfaction, and changes in rated job performance: A field experiment. Journal of Psychology, 127, 281-291.
48.
Villanova, R.
, Bernardin, H. J., Dahmus, S. A., & Sims, R. L. (1993). Rater leniency and performance appraisal discomfort. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 789-799.
49.
Woehr, D. J.
, & Huffcutt, A. I. (1994). Rater training for performance appraisal: A quantitative review. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 189-205.
