Local-government associations often advocate constitutional or statutory reimbursement requirements as a solution for unfunded state mandates, predicating advocacy on the assumption that such a requirement will be effective once in place. However, the experience of the states with mandate reimbursement requirements varies widely. Much of the variation can be attributed to legislative flexibility in implementation language and by technical exemptions courts offer. Rather than offering a solution for one of the more contentious issues in state-local relations, mandate reimbursement requirements can sometimes create a new set of problems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
California Commission on State Mandates
. (1990). Local government guide to the mandate process. Sacramento.
2.
Committee on Taxation, Michigan State Senate
. (1983). Michigan's fiscal structure: Background and current issues. Lansing.
3.
Florida Advisory Council on Intergovernmental Relations
. (1991). 1991 report on mandate and measures affecting local fiscal capacity. Tallahassee.
4.
Horte, R.
(1990). State experiences with mandate reimbursement. In M. Fix & D. A. Kenyon (Eds.), Coping with mandates: What are the alternatives? (pp. 57-62). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
5.
Illinois Commission on Intergovernmental Relations
. (1986). A review of the Illinois State Mandates Act, 1981-1985. Springfield.
6.
Kelly, J. M.
(1992). State mandates. Washington, DC: National League of Cities Press.
7.
Lovell, C.
, & Tobin, C. (1981). The mandate issue. Public Administration Review, 41, 318-331.
8.
Lunceford, E. D.
(1990). Massachusetts mandate statute and its applications. In M. Fix & D. A. Kenyon (Eds.), Coping with mandates: What are the alternatives? (pp. 77-84). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
9.
McManus, S. A.
(1990). Mad about mandates: The issue of who should pay for what resurfaces in the 1990s. Publius, 21, 59-75.
10.
Neiman, M.
, & Lovell, C. (1982). Federal and state mandating: A first look at the mandate terrain. Administration and Society, 14, 343-372.
11.
Office of the State Auditor, Commonwealth of Massachusetts
. (1990). Eighth semi-annual report. Boston.
12.
Rhode Island Public Expenditure Council
. (1990, March 9). RIPEC comments. Providence.
13.
Rubin, K. C.
(1990). Unfunded mandates: A continuing source of intergovernmental discord. Florida State University Law Review, 17, 592-620.
14.
U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations
. (1990). Mandates: Cases in state-local relations. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
15.
U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations
. (1978). State mandating of local expenditures. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
16.
U.S. General Accounting Office
. (1988). Legislative mandates. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
17.
Zimmerman, J. F.
(1987). The state mandate problem. State and Local Government Review, 19, 78-84.
