We systematically explore differences between the policy analysis and public administration/management approaches to public service education. From the literature, we identify four aspects of public service education that may differ between public administration/management and policy analysis: the students who enter each kind of program, the norms students gain through professional socialization in each approach, the career paths followed by graduates of each kind of program, and program graduates career satisfaction. We develop several hypotheses about differences in applicant pools, student socialization, and the careers of graduates of public administration and policy analysis programs. Finally, we discuss the importance of testing these hypotheses: why alternative findings might be expected and implications of tests of these hypotheses for public service education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allison, G.
(1980). Public and private management: Are they fundamentally alike in all unimportant respects?Proceedings for the Public Management Research Conference, November 19-20, 1979. Washington, DC: Office of Personnel Management, OPM Document 127-53-1.
2.
Altshuler, A.
(1990). Teaching leadership. Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, San Francisco, CA, October 18-20.
3.
Appleby, P.
(1949). Policy and administration. University, AL: University of Alabama Press.
4.
Averch, H.
, & Dluhy, M. (1991). Teaching public administration, public management, and policy analysis: Convergence or divergence in the masters core. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 11, 541-551.
5.
Banfield, E. C.
(1980). Policy science as a metaphysical madness. In R. A. Goldman (Ed.), Bureaucrats, policy analysts, statesmen: Who leads? (pp. 1-19). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
6.
Barzelay, M.
, & Armajani, B. J. (1990). Managing state government operations: Changing visions of staff agencies. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 10, 307-338.
7.
Barzelay, M.
, & Kaboolian, L. (1990). Structural metaphors and public management education. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 10, 599-610.
8.
Behn, R. D.
(1988). Management by groping along?Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 8, 643-663.
9.
Bovbjerg, R. R.
(1989). Nurturing policy ideas: In search of creative new insights. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 8, 329-332.
10.
Brandl, J. E.
(1982). Economics in the public policy curriculum. In J. P. Crecine (Ed.), The new educational programs in public policy: The first decade (pp. 25-49). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
11.
Crecine, J. P.
(1982). Introduction and overview. In J. P. Crecine (Ed.), The new educational programs in public policy: The first decade (pp. 1-23). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
12.
Elmore, R. F.
(1986). Graduate education in public management: Working the seams of government. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 6, 69-83.
13.
Fredrickson, H. G.
(1990). Public administration as social equity. Public Administration Review50, 228-237.
14.
Gurel, L.
(1975). The human side of evaluating human service programs. In M. Guttentag & E. L. Struening (Eds.), Handbook of evaluation research, Volume 1. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
15.
Heineman, R. A.
, Bluhm, W. T., Peterson, S. A., & Kearney, E. N. (1990). The world of the policy analyst: Rationality, values, and politics. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.
16.
Jenkins-Smith, H. C.
(1990). Democratic politics and policy analysis. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
17.
Lauth, T.
(1985). Performance evaluation in the Georgia budgetary process. Public Budgeting and Finance, 5, 67-82.
18.
Lynn, L. E., Jr.
(1987). Managing public policy. Boston: Little, Brown.
19.
MacRae, D.
, & Wilde, J. A. (1979). Policy analysis for public decisions. North Scituate, MA: Duxbury Press.
20.
Marini, F.
(Ed.). (1971). Toward a new public administration: The Minnowbrook perspective. Scranton, PA: Chandler Publishing Company.
21.
Meltsner, A. J.
(1976). Policy analysts in the bureaucracy. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
22.
National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration (NASPAA)
. (1981). Standards of professional master degree programs in public affairs. Washington, DC: NASPAA.
23.
Robinson, J. P.
, Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1991). Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes, Volume 1. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
24.
Roeder, P. W.
, & Whitaker, G. P. (1993). Education for the public service: Policy analysis and administration in the MPA core curriculum. Administration and Society, 24, 512-540.
25.
Rosenberg, M.
(1957). Occupations and values. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
26.
Russell, J. R.
(1982). Management in the public sector. In J. R. Crecine (Ed.), The new educational programs in public policy: The first decade (pp. 103-130). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
27.
Simon, H. A.
(1947). Administrative behavior. New York: Macmillan.
28.
Simon, H. A.
, & Thompson, V. A. (1991). The reissue of Simon, Smithburg, and Thompson's public administration. Journal of Public Administration: Research and Theory, 1, 75-88.
29.
Stillman, R. J.
(1991). Preface to public administration: A search for themes and direction. New York: St. Martin's Press.
30.
Stokes, D. E.
(1982). General skills in public policy programs. In J. P. Crecine (Ed.), The new educational programs in public policy: The first decade (pp. 157-174). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
31.
Stone, D. A.
(1988). Policy paradox and political reason. New York: Harper Collins.
32.
Tribe, L.
(1972). Policy science: Analysis or ideology?Philosophy and Public Affairs, 2, 66-110.
33.
Weimer, D. L.
, & Vining, A. R. (1989). Policy analysis: Concepts and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
34.
Weiss, C. H.
(1972). Evaluation research: Methods for assessing program effectiveness. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
