The politics-administration dichotomy was long ago dismissed as either a descriptive or (except for a few notable holdouts) prescriptive account of what the role of public administration should be. Yet the dichotomy endures in practice and in habit of mind, embedded in institutional traditions and in the legal code as well.
Political involvement-coalition formation, symbol manipulation, constituency mobilization-by public administrators is an everyday occurrence. Inside and outside the agency are struggles over resource distribution, professional norms and proper procedures, or the level of threat/reassurance that should be attached to various events, groups, or individuals.
Political engagement remains problematic for public administrators, however. If political involvement is permitted, someone will have to rethink the meaning of Progressivism, neutral competence, professionalism, and an expert-based civil service. More daunting still, compelling critiques of representative democracy have placed electoral institutions on the table for discussion as well.
A hopeful future for public administration is grounded in a renewed assertion of the viability and meaningfulness of the public interest as a standard against which claims offered in the public conversation may be judged. A healthy public discourse preserves and creates an authentic polls that is able to focus on community aims and purposes, hence clarifying public administration's legitimate role in governance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, G. B.
, & Ingersoll, V. H. (1990). Culture technical rationality, and organization culture. American Review of Public Administration, 20 (4), 285-302.
2.
Adams, H.
(1958). Civil service reform. In G. Hochfield (Ed.), The great secession winter of 1860-61 and other essays by Henry Adams. New York: Sagamore Press.
3.
Argyris, C.
(1957). The individual and the organization: Some problems of mutual adjustment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2 (1), 1-24.
4.
Bacharach, S. B.
, & Lawler, E. J. (1980). Power and politics in organizations: The social psychology of conflict, coalitions, and bargaining. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
Bell, R.
(1985). Professional values and organizational decision making. Administration & Society, 17 (1), 21-60.
6.
Burke, J. P.
(1986). Bureaucratic responsibility. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
7.
Cook, B. J.
(1992). The representative function of bureaucracy: Public administration in constitutive perspective. Administration & Society, 23 (94), 403-429.
8.
Cooper, T. L.
(1991). An ethic of citizenship for public administration. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
9.
Reprinted from M. Haire (Ed.), (1959). Modern organization theory (pp. 76-90). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
10.
DiMaggio, P. J.
, & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48 (2), 147-160.
11.
Edelman, M.
(1964). The symbolic uses of politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
12.
Edelman, M.
(1988). Constructing the political spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Elder, C. D.
, & Cobb, R. W. (1983). The political uses of symbols. New York: Longman.
14.
Fischer, F.
(1989). Technocracy & the politics of expertise: Managerial & policy perspectives. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15.
Fox, C. J.
(1990). Warrants for public policy discourse: Public administration and democracy. Paper presented at the Public Administration Theory Symposium, April 1990, Los Angeles.
16.
Fox, C. J.
, & Cochran, C. E. (1990). Discretionary public administration: Toward a platonic guardian class? In H. D. Kass & B. L. Catron, Images and identities in public administration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17.
Frost, P. J.
, Moore, L. F., Louis, M. R., Lundberg, C. C., & Martin, J. (Eds.). (1991). Organizational culture. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18.
Gawthrop, L.
(1987). Toward an ethical convergence of democratic theory and administrative politics. In R. C. Chandler (Ed.), A centennial history of the American administrative state (pp. 189-216). New York: The Free Press.
19.
Goodsell, C.
(1990). Public administration and the public interest. In G. L. Wamsley et al., Refounding public administration (pp. 96-113). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
Green, R. T.
(1992). Constitutional jurisprudence: Reviving praxis in public administration. Administration & Society, 24 (1), 3-21.
21.
Gruber, J. E.
(1986). Controlling bureaucracies: Dilemmas in democratic governance. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
22.
Habermas, J.
(1975). Legitimation crisis. Translated by Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.
23.
Henry, N.
(1987). The emergence of public administration as a field of study. In R. C. Chandler (Ed.), A centennial history of the American administrative state (pp. 37-85). New York: The Free Press.
24.
Kass, H. D.
(1990). Stewardship as a fundamental element of public administration. In H. D. Kass & B. L. Catron, Images and identities in public administration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25.
Kellow, A.
(1988). Promoting elegance in policy theory: Simplifying Lowi's arenas of power. Policy Studies Journal, 16 (4), 712-724.
26.
Long, N. E.
(1949). Power and administration. Public Administration Review, 9, 257-264.
27.
Long, N. E.
(1990). Conceptual notes on the public interest for public administration and policy analysis. Administration & Society, 22 (2), 170-181.
28.
Also reprinted as Chapter 44: Distribution, regulation, redistribution: The functions of government (1986). In P. S. Nivola & D. H. Rosenbloom, (Eds.), Classic readings in American politics. New York: St. Martins.
29.
Lowi, T. J.
(1969). The end of liberalism: Ideology, policy, and the crisis of public authority. New York: W. W. Norton.
30.
Lowi, T. J.
(1972). Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public Administration Review, 32, 298-310.
31.
Macpherson, C. B.
(1966). The real world of democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
Marshall, G. S.
, & White, O. F. (1990). The Blacksburg Manifesto and the postmodern debate: Public administration in a time without a name. American Review of Public Administration, 20 (2), 61-76.
33.
Merkle, J. A.
(1980). Management and ideology: The legacy of the international scientific management movement. Berkeley: University of California Press.
34.
Miller, H. T.
(1990). Weber's action theory and Lowi's policy types in formulation, enactment, and implementation. Policy Studies Journal, 18 (3), 13-21.
35.
Miller, T. C.
(1992). What Adam Smith and James Madison would say about the American political economy today. Public Administration Review, 52 (1), 70-76.
36.
Morgan, D.
(1990). Administrative phronesis: Discretion and the problem of administrative legitimacy in our constitutional system. In H. D. Kass & B. L. Catron, Images and identities in public administration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37.
Pateman, C.
(1970). Participation and democratic theory. London: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Pfeffer, J.
(1981). Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pittman Publishing.
39.
Pfeffer, J.
(1992). Managing with power. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing Division.
40.
Ripley, R. B.
, & Franklin, G. A. (1986). Policy implementation and bureaucracy (2nd ed.). Chicago: Dorsey Press.
41.
Schein, E.
(1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
42.
Scott, W. R.
(1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 493-511.
43.
Smith, T. A.
(1975). The comparative policy process. Santa Barbara: ABC-Clio.
44.
Spitzer, R. J.
(1987). Promoting policy theory: Revising the arenas of power. Policy Studies Journal, 15 (4), 675-689.
45.
Stivers, C.
(1990). The public agency as polls. Administration & Society, 22 (1), 86-105.
46.
Stone, D.
(1988). Policy paradox and political reason. Glenveiw, IL: Scott, Foresman & Company.
47.
Tannenbaum, A. S.
(1984). Some controversies about control and democracy in organizations. In National Employee-Ownership and Participation Conference Proceedings (pp. 450-474). Greensboro, NC.
48.
Van Riper, R. P.
(1987). The American administrative state: Wilson and the founders. In R. C. Chandler (Ed.), A centennial history of the American administrative state (pp. 3-36). New York: The Free Press.
49.
Wamsley, G. L.
(1990). Introduction. In Wamsley et al. Refounding public administration (pp. 19-29). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
50.
Wamsley, G. L.
, Bacher, R. N., Goodsell, C. T., Kronenberg, P. S., Rohr, J. A., Stivers, C. M., White, O. F., & Wolf, J. F. (1990). Refounding public administration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
51.
Wamsley, G. L.
, Goodsell, C. T., Rohr, J. A., Stivers, C. M., White, O. F., & Wolf, J. F. (1987). The public administration and the governance process: Refocusing the American dialogue. In R. C. Chandler (Ed.), A centennial history of the American administrative state (pp. 291-317). New York: The Free Press.
52.
Yates, D., Jr.
(1985). The politics of management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
