Interest in professional ethics education for public administrators has been booming for the past two decades, and teaching public administration ethics entails a variety of approaches. This article argues that literature is an effective main source for exploring public administration ethics. Several reasons support this argument: students are receptive to literature and learn from it; there is an element of storytelling in our everyday approach as well as in our scholarly approach to ethics; literature offers an empathetic dimension; and good literature of lasting value instead of more prosaic methods with short-lived value contributes to lifelong education as well as professional training. This article offers examples of how we can use certain works of literature to teach public administration ethics and how this literature relates to central questions of public administration ethics. This approach can be useful to practitioners in their exploration of professional ethics as well as to public administration teachers and students. This perspective also suggests directions for future research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anouilh, J.
(1958). Antigone: A Tragedy (adapted and translated by L. Galantiere). In J. Anouilh, Five plays (Vol. I). New York: Hill and Wang.
2.
Argyle, N. J.
, & Bright, B. K. (1992). The novel as case study: Using fiction to teach administrative truths. In Fifteenth national conference on teaching public administration (pp. 9-20). Charleston, SC: The Institute for Public Affairs and Policy Studies, College of Charleston.
3.
Bennett, J.
(1974). The conscience of Huckleberry Finn. Philosophy, 49(188), 123-134.
4.
Brecht, B. (1984). Sophocles' Antigone, (Adapted by B. Brecht, based on the German translation by F Höderlin, and translated into English by J. Malina). New York: Applause Theatre Book Publishers.
5.
Burke, J. P.
(1986). Bureaucratic responsibility. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
6.
Cooper, T. L.
(1986). The responsible administrator: An approach to ethics for the administrative role (2nd ed.). New York: Associate Faculty Press.
7.
Denhardt, K. G.
(1988). The ethics of public service: Resolving moral dilemmas in public organizations. New York: Greenwood Press.
8.
Donagan, A.
(1977). The theory of morality pp. 131-142. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
Egger, R.
(1944). Fable for wise men. Public Administration Review, 4(4), 371-376.
10.
Egger, R.
(1959). The administrative novel. American Political Science Review, 53(2), 448-455.
11.
Harmon, M. M.
(1990). The responsible actor as "tortured soul": The case of Horatio Hornblower. In H. D. Kass & B. L. Catron (Eds.), Images and identities in public administration (pp. 151-180). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
12.
Holzer, M.
, Morris, K., & Ludwin, W. (Eds.). (1979). Literature in bureaucracy: Readings in administrative fiction. Wayne, NJ: Avery Publishing Group.
13.
Hockhuth, R.
(1964). The deputy (Translated by R. Winston & C. Winston, preface by A. Schweitzer). New York: Grove Press.
14.
Hummel, R.
(1991). Stories managers tell: Why they are as valid as science. Public Administration Review, 51(1), 31-41.
15.
Hunker, B. S.
(1992). A rationale and bibliography: Films for the teaching of ethics. In Fifteenth national conference on teaching public administration (pp. 187-191). Charleston, SC: The Institute for Public Affairs and Policy Studies, College of Charleston.
16.
Kroll, M.
(1965). Administrative fiction and credibility. Public Administration Review, 25(1), 80-84.
17.
Kroll, M.
(1981). The third dimension: Uses of fiction in public administration. Dialogue: The public administration theory network, 3(2), 9-12.
18.
Marini, F.
(1991). Literature and teaching ethics for public administrators. In Proceedings of the 14th national teaching public administration conference (pp. 146-152). Knoxville, TN: East Tennessee ASPA Chapter.
19.
Marini, F.
(in press). The uses of literature in the exploration of public administration ethics: The example of Antigone. Public Administration Review.
20.
McCurdy, H. E.
(1973). Fiction, phenomenology, and public administration. Public Administration Review, 33(1), 52-60.
21.
McCurdy, H. E.
(1987). How novelists view public administration. In R. C. Chandler (Ed.), A centennial history of the American administrative state (pp. 543-574). New York: The Free Press.
22.
Murray, N.
(1992). PA 631: Humanizing the workplace. In Fifteenth national conference on teaching public administration (pp. 301-309). Charleston, SC: The Institute for Public Affairs and Policy Studies, College of Charleston.
23.
Myers, J. A.
(1992). The different perspectives of the budget making process. In Fifteenth national conference on teaching public administration (pp. 313-321). Charleston, SC: The Institute for Public Affairs and Policy Studies, College of Charleston.
24.
Rohr, J. A.
(1989). Ethics for bureaucrats: An essay on law and values (2nd ed.). New York: Marcel Dekker.
25.
Sartre, J.
(1989). Dirty hands. In J. Sartre, No exit and three other plays (pp. 1-46). New York: Vintage International.
26.
Sophocles. Antigone.
27.
Sidnell, M. J.
(1967). Huck Finn and Jim: Their abortive freedom ride. The Cambridge Quarterly, 2(3), 203-211.
28.
Steinberg, S. S.
(1982). PM: Public management, 64(5), 20-33.
29.
Timmins, W. M.
(1990). A casebook of public ethics and issues. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
30.
Twain, M.The adventures of Huckleberry Finn. Many editions.
31.
Vonnegut, K.
(1970). Harrison Bergeron. In K. Vonnegut, Welcome to the monkey house (pp. 7-13). New York: Dell.
32.
Wagenheim, J.
(1990). The secret life of men: A New Age Journal interview. New Age, 44 (September/October).
33.
Waldo, D.
(1956). Perspectives of literature. In D. Waldo, Perspectives on administration (pp. 77-106). University, AL: University of Alabama Press.
34.
Waldo, D.
(1968). The novelist on organization & administration: An inquiry into the relationship between two worlds. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California.
35.
Waldo, D.
(1980). The enterprise of public administration: A summary view. Novato, CA: Chandler & Sharp.
36.
Walzer, M.
(1973). Political action: The problem of dirty hands. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 2(2), 160-180.
37.
White, J. D.
(in press). Knowledge development and use in public administration: Views from postpositivism, poststructuralism, and postmodernism. In M. T. Bailey & R. T. Mayer (Eds.), Public administration in an interconnected world: Essays in the Minnowbrook tradition. New York: Greenwood Press.
38.
Willbern, Y.
(1984). Types and levels of public morality. Public Administration Review, 44(2), 102-108.
39.
Zimmerman, J. F.
(1987). Preventing unethical behavior in government. Urban Law and Policy8, 335-356.
