Taking Language Seriously: Toward a Narrative Theory of Knowledge for Administrative Research

Bailey, M. T. (1992). Do physicists use case studies? Thoughts on public administration research. Public Administration Review, 52(1): 47-55.

Bell, D. (1976). The cultural contradictions of capitalism. New York: Basic Books.

Berger, P. L. , Berger, B. , & Kellner, H. (1973). The homeless mind. New York: Vintage Books.

Bernstein, R. J. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Campbell, C. (1986, February 9). The tyranny of the Yale critics. The New York Times Magazine. p. 23.

Deetz, S. (1973). An understanding of science and a hermeneutic science of understanding. Journal of Communication, 23(2): 139-159.

Derrida, J. (1973). Speech and phenomena, and other essays on Husserl's theory of signs. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

Dobel, J. (1992). The moral realities of public life as portrayed in fiction. American Review of Public Administration, 22(2): 127-143.

Duhem, P. (1954). The aim and structure of physical theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Gadamer, H-G. (1975). Truth and method. New York: Seabury Press.

Gadamer, H-G. (1977). Philosophical Hermeneutics. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Gunnell, J. G. (1975). Philosophy, science, and political inquiry. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interests (translated by J. Shaprio). Boston: Beacon Press.

Habermas, J. (1977). A review of Gadamer's truth and method. In F. Dallmayr & T. McCarthy (Eds.), Understanding and social inquiry (pp. 353-356). Notre Dame. IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

Habermas, J. (1981). New social movements. Telos, 49(Fall): 33-37.

Hesse, M. (1980). Revolutions and reconstructions in the philosophy of science. Brighton, England: Harvester Press.

Hirsch, E. D. (1967). Validity in interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Hirsch, E. D. (1976). The aims of interpretation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Holzer, M. , Morris, K. , & Ludwin, W. (Eds.) (1979). Literature in bureaucracy: Readings in administrative fiction. Yayne, NJ: Avery Publishing Group.

Hummel, R. (1991). Stories managers tell: Why they are as valid as science. Public Administration Review, 51(1): 31-41.

Jameson, F. (1984). Postmodernism and the cultural logic of capital. New Left Review, 146(July/August): 53-92.

Jameson, F. (1985). The political unconsciousness: Narrative as a socially symbolic act. London: Methuen.

Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kroll, M. (1965). Administrative fiction and credibility. Public Administration Review, 25(1): 80-84.

Lacan, J. (1977). Ecrits: A selection. London: Tavistock.

Lacan, J. (1978a). The language of the self: The function of language in psychoanalysis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Lacan, J. (1978b). The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis. London: Hogarth Press.

Lyotard, J. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Marini, F. (1992). Literature and public administration ethics. American Review of Public Administration, 22(2): 111-125.

McCurdy, H. E. (1973). Fiction, phenomenology, and public administration. Public Administration Review, 33(1): 52-60.

McCurdy, H. E. (1987). How novelists view public administration. In R. C. Chandler (Ed.), A centennial history of the American administrative state (pp. 543-574). New York: The Free Press.

Palmer, R. (1969). Hermeneutics. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic Books.

Quine, W. V. O. (1964). Form a logical point of view. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Saussure, F. (1974). Course in general linguistics. London: Fontana.

Waldo, D. (1956). Perspectives of literature. In D. Waldo (Ed.), Perspectives on administration (pp. 77-106). University of Alabama: University of Alabama Press.

White, J. D. (1987). Action theory and literary interpretation. Administration and Society, 19(3): 346-366.

White, J. D. (1992). Knowledge development and use in public administration: Views from postpositivism, poststructuralism, and postmodernism. In M. T. Bailey & R. T. Mayer (Eds.), Public administration in an interconnected world: Essays in the Minnowbrook tradition (pp. 159-176). New York: Greenwood Press.

Yanow, D. (1992). Supermarkets and culture clash: The epistemological role of metaphor in administrative practice. American Review of Public Administration, 22(2): 89-109.