Bremer, J. A.
(1984). Building institutional capacity for policy analysis: An alternative approach to sustainability. Public Administration and Development, 4, 1-13.
2.
Brinkerhoff, D. W.
(1986). The evolution of current perspectives on institutional development: An organizational focus. In D. W. Brinkerhoff & J.-C. Garcia-Zamor (Eds.), Politics, projects, and people: Institutional development in Haiti (pp. 11-59). New York: Praeger.
3.
Bryant, C.
(1979). Organizational impediments to making participation a reality: Swimming upstream in AID. Rural Development Participation Review (Spring), 8-10.
4.
Caravedo Molinari, B. (1983). El problema del descentralismo. Lima: Centro de Investigación de la Universidad del Pacĺfico.
5.
Chambers, R.
(1978). Project selection for poverty-focused rural development: Simple is optimal. World Development, 6, 209-219.
6.
Checchi and Company Consulting, Inc.
(1987). Evaluation of the Peruvian flood drought rehabilitation and construction program 1983-1987. Final Report. Washington, DC: Author.
7.
Cheema, G. S.
, & Rondinelli, D. A. (1983). Decentralization and development: Conclusions and directions. In G. S. Cheema & D. A. Rondinelli (Eds.), Decentralization and development: Policy implementation in developing countries (pp. 295-315). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
8.
Chetwynd, E.
, Hatch, J., Hammergren, L., Johnson, R., Rondinelli, D., & Salinas, P. W. (1985). Integrated regional development: Final evaluation. Lima: AID/Peru.
9.
De Soto, H. (1987). El otro sendero (6th ed.). Bogotá: Printer Colombiana.
10.
Dillon, R (1986). Sistema de priorización de inversiones (2nd ed.). Lima: PATC-CORDES.
11.
Franco Temple, I. (1986). Algunos problemas cuyas soluciones están fuera del alcance de las Corporaciones Departamentales de Desarrollo y que han obstaculizado su gestión. Lima: AID/Peru.
12.
French, J.
, Lindenburg, M., Gomez, F. J., Mann, L., Austin, A., Baanante, J., Hatch, J., Lanao, A., Cornejo, W., & Arce, A. (1983). Evaluation of the Integrated Regional Development Project. Lima, AID/Peru.
13.
Garzón, J. (1986). Centralization, decentralization, and the state in southern Peru (Doctoral dissertation, University of California at Berkeley). Ann Arbor, Ml: University Microfilms.
14.
Hage, J.
, & Finsterbusch, K.1987. Organizational change as a development strategy: Models and tactics for improving Third World organizations. Boulder, CO: Lynn Reinner.
15.
Hammergren, L.
(1985). Institutional development in the CORDES. In E. Chetwynd, J. Hatch, L. Hammergren, R. Johnson, D. Rondinelli, & P. W. Salinas (Eds.), Integrated regional development: Final evaluation (Annex B). Lima: AID/Peru.
16.
Hatch, J. K.
, Lanao Flores, A., Cornejo, W., Arce, R., & Arce, J. (1985). An evaluation of rural development projects in the departments of Cajamarca and Junín-Peru: Their cost effectiveness and community impact. Bethesda, MD: Rural Development Services.
17.
Hermann, C.
(1985). Implementing policy and institutional change via performance disbursement (A.I.D. Evaluation Occasional Paper No. 1). Washington, DC: Agency for International Development.
18.
Hermann, C.
(1986). Flexible project design approaches: AID/Washington views and examples from the Philippines (A.I.D. Evaluation Occasional Paper No. 3). Washington, DC: Agency for International Development.
19.
Hirsh, M. H.
(1987). Project assistance completion report. Peru: Disaster Relief, Rehabilitation, and Reconstruction Project (527-0277). Lima: AID/Peru.
20.
Honadle, G. H.
, & Rosengard, J. K. (1983). Putting `projectized' development in perspective. Public Administration and Development, 3, 299-305.
21.
Honadle, G. H.
, & Van Sant, J. (1985). Implementation for sustainability: Lessons from integrated rural development, West Hartford, CN: Kumarian.
22.
Johnson, T.
, Hammergren, L., Berry, E., Landmann, R., Cohen, J., & Adler, R. (1983). The impact of PL 480 Title I in Peru: Food as an effective development resource (A.I.D. Project Impact Evaluation, no. 47). Washington, DC: U.S. Agency for International Development.
23.
King, D. Y.
(1982). Bilateral development assistance in Indonesia. Jakarta: American Embassy.
24.
King, D. Y.
(1988). Civil service policies in Indonesia: An obstacle to decentralization?Public Administration and Development, 8, 249-260.
25.
Korten, D. C.
(1980). Community organization and rural development: A learning process approach. Public Administration Review, 40, 480-511.
26.
Korten, D. C.
(1983). Learning from field experience: Institutional development and the dynamics of the policy process (NASPAA Working Paper, no. 7). Washington, DC: National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration and U.S. Agency for International Development, Bureau for Science and Technology, Office of Rural Development and Development Administration.
27.
Lecomte, B. J.
(1986). Project aid: Limitations and alternatives, Paris: Development Centre of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
28.
Leonard, D. K.
(1982a). Analyzing the organizational requirements for serving the rural poor. In D. K. Leonard & D. R. Marshall (Eds.), Institutions of rural development for the poor: Decentralization and organizational linkages (pp. 1-39). Berkeley: University of California, Institute of International Studies.
29.
Leonard, D. K.
(1982b). Choosing among forms of decentralization and linkage. In D. K. Leonard & D. R. Marshall (Eds.), Institutions of rural development for the poor: Decentralization and organizational linkages (pp. 193-226). Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California.
30.
Leonard D. K.
(1983). Interorganizational linkages for decentralized rural development: Overcoming administrative weakness. In G. Shabbir Cheema & D. A. Rondinelli (Eds.), Decentralization and development: Policy implementation in developing countries (pp. 271-293). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
31.
Lindblom, C. E.
(1965). The intelligence of democracy: Decision making through mutual adjustment, New York: Free Press.
32.
Local Revenue Administration Project
. (1984). Syracuse University technical assistance to the Integrated Regional Development Project (Peru): Final report. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs.
33.
Mathur, K.
(1983). Administrative decentralization in Asia. In G. S. Cheema & D. A. Rondinelli (Eds.), Decentralization and development: Policy implementation in developing countries (pp. 59-76). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
34.
Moncada, L.
, Collins, D., Cordon, O., & Faigenblum, J. (1985). Progress evaluation of the Rural Water Systems and Environmental Sanitation Project: Peru. (WASH Field Report, no. 134). Washington, DC: Water and Sanitation for Health Project.
35.
Morgan, E. P.
(1983). The project orthodoxy in development: Re-evaluating the cutting edge. Public Administration and Development, 3, 329-339.
36.
Morss, E. R.
, Gow, D. D., & Nordlinger, C. W. (1985). Sustaining project benefits. In E. R. Morss & D. D. Gow (Eds.), Implementing rural development projects: Lessons from AID and World Bank experiences (pp. 217-243). Boulder, CO: Westview.
37.
Morss, E. R.
, & Honadle, G. H. (1985). Differing agendas. In E. R. Morss & D. D. Gow (Eds.), Implementing rural development projects: Lessons from AID and World Bank experiences (pp. 199-215). Boulder, CO: Westview.
38.
Morss, E. R.
, & Van Sant, J. (1985). Timing. In E. R. Morss & D. D. Gow (Eds.), Implementing rural development projects: Lessons from AID and World Bank experiences (pp. 149-173). Boulder, CO: Westview.
39.
National Planning Institute, (INP). (1983). Programa integral de rehabilitación y reconstrucción de las zonas afectadas por los desastres de la naturaleza (3 vols.).
40.
Painter, M.
, Fitch, J., Merschrod, K., & Molina, M. (1985). Improved water and land use in the sierra (Plan MERIS): Final Evaluation. Lima: AID/Peru.
41.
Rondinelli, D. A.
(1981). Government decentralization in comparative perspective: Theory and practice in developing countries. International Review of Administrative Science, 47, 133-145.
42.
Rondinelli, D. A.
(1983a). Development projects as policy experiments: An adaptive approach to development administration. New York: Methuen.
43.
Rondinelli, D. A.
(1983b). Implementing decentralization programmes in Asia: A Comparative Analysis. Public Administration and Development3:181-207.
44.
Rondinelli, D. A.
(1983c). Projects as instruments of development administration: A qualified defence and suggestions for improvement. Public Administration and Development, 3, 307-327.
45.
Rondinelli, D. A.
(1985). Applied methods of regional analysis: The spatial dimensions of developmental policyBoulder, CO: Westview.
46.
Rondinelli, D. A.
(1987). Development administration and U.S. foreign aid policy. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner.
47.
Rondinelli, D. A.
, & Nellis, J. R. (1986). Assessing decentralization policies in developing countries: The case for cautious optimism. Development Policy Review, 4, 3-23.
48.
Rondinelli, D. A.
, Nellis, J. R., & Cheema, G. S. (1984). Decentralization in developing countries: Review of recent experiences (World Bank Staff Working Papers, no. 581). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
49.
Rondinelli, D. A.
, & Ruddle, K. (1978). Urbanization and rural development: A spatial strategy for equitable growth. New York: Praeger.
50.
Rondinelli, D. A.
, & Salinas, P. W. (1985). Regional planning in the IRD Project. In E. Chetwynd, J. Hatch, L. Hammergren, R. Johnson, D. Rondinelli, & P. W. Salinas, Integrated regional development: Final evaluation (Annex A.) Lima: AID/Peru.
51.
Roush, J.
, Avalos, J., Kusterer, K., Rodriquez, J., & Stone, R. (1984). Management assessment of Andean relief activities: Draft final report. Prepared for Office of Development Resources, Bureau of Latin America and the Caribbean, Agency for International Development by Checchi and Company, Washington, DC.
52.
[Translated and disseminated by USAID-Peru as La asistencia de la A.I.D. y las corporaciones departamentales de Desarrollo en el Perú: Contexto, experiencias del Proyecto y perspectives para el futuro.]
53.
Schmidt, G. D.
(1988). Effective donor support for decentralization: Some insights from USAID experience in Peru (A.I.D. Working Paper, No. 93). Washington, DC: Agency for International Development, Center for Development Information and Evaluation.
54.
Schmidt, G. D.
(1989a). Donors and decentralization in developing countries: Insights from AID experience in Peru. Boulder, CO: Westview.
55.
Schmidt, G. D.
(1989b). Effective donor support for decentralization: The Peruvian experience in comparative perspective. (A.I.D. Working Paper, No. 118). Washington, DC: Agency for International Development, Center for Development Information and Evaluation.
56.
Schmidt, G. D.
(1989c). Political variables and governmental decentralization in Peru. Journal of InterAmerican Studies and World Affairs, 31(1-2) (Spring/Summer), 193-232.
57.
Schmidt, G. D.
(1989d, December). Regional governments in Peru: Electoral demagoguery or transcendental reform? Paper presented at the XV International Congress, Latin American Studies Association, Miami, FL.
58.
Silverman, J. M.
(1984). Technical assistance and aid agency staff: Alternative techniques for greater effectiveness (World Bank Technical Paper Number 28). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
59.
Strachan, H. W.
(1978). Side-effects of planning in the aid control system. World Development, 6, 467-478.
60.
Tendler, J.
(1975). Inside foreign aid. Balitmore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
61.
Torres Guzm An, A.
(1989). Perfil de/elector. Lima: Editorial Apoyo.
62.
Uphoff, N. T.
(1986). Local institutional development: An analytical source-book with cases. West Hartford, CN: Kumarian.
63.
U.S. Agency for International Development
. (1979). Peru project paper: Integrated regional development. Washington, DC: Author.
64.
U.S. Agency for International Development
. (1983). Peru project paper: Disaster relief and rehabilitation. Washington, DC: Author.
65.
U.S. General Accounting Office
. (1983). A troubled project: Rural water systems and environmental sanitation in Peru (GAO/ID-83-42). Washington, DC: Author.
66.
U.S. General Accounting Office
. (1985). Report to the administrator, Agency for International Development: AID recognizes need to improve the foreign economic assistance planning and programming process (GAO/NSIAD-85-110). Washington, DC: Author.
67.
Van Sant, J.
, & Crawford, P. R. (1985). Coping with political, economic, environmental, and institutional constraints. In E. R. Morss & D. D. Gow (Eds.), Implementing rural development projects: Lessons from AID and World Bank experiences. (pp. 1-32). Boulder, CO: Westview.
68.
White, L. G.
(1987). Creating opportunities for change: Approaches to managing development programs. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner.
69.
Wilkinson, J. L.
, McKean, C., Meyer, R., Nunberg, B., Weil, C., & Martinez, H. (1984). Peru: Improved water and land use in the sierra (A.I.D. Project Impact Evaluation, no. 54). Washington, DC: U.S. Agency for International Development.
