This research examines presidents' administrative actions in civil rights policy and agency responses to those actions. It considers the frequent debate between presidential influence over the bureaucracy versus the more commonly posited model of bureaucratic discretion. Results suggest that assertive presidents like Johnson and Reagan can influence agency actions in civil rights policy; they obtain closer correspondence with their preferred policies than do less assertive presidents. Overall, however, only limited correspondence between presidential and agency actions appears because agencies have considerable discretion in their implementing actions. Thus neither presidential influence nor bureaucratic discretion fully explains the relationship.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aberbach, J. P.
, & Rockman, B. A., (1976). Clashing beliefs within the executive branch: The Nixon administration bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 70 (June), 456-468.
2.
Bardach, E.
(1977). Implementation game. Boston: MIT Press.
3.
Budget of the U.S. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office (annual).
4.
Budget of the U.S. government: Appendix. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office (annual).
5.
Bullock, C. S. III
. (1984). Conditions associated with policy implementation. In C.S. Bullock & C. M. Lamb (Eds.), Implementation of civil rights policy. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 184-207.
6.
Bullock, C. S. Ill
, & Lamb, C. M., (Eds.). (1984). Implementation of civil rights policy. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
7.
Bullock, C. S. III
, & Stewart, J., Jr. (1984). New programs in "old" agencies: Lessons in organizational change from the Office for Civil Rights. Administration and Society, 15 (February), 387-412.
8.
Caputo, D.
, Cole, R. (1979). Presidential control of the senior civil service. American Political Science Review, 73 (June), 399-413.
9.
Carter, H. III
. (1986). South Africa at home: Reagan and the revival of racism. Playboy, (January), 107-108, 214, 218, 220.
10.
Department of Housing and Urban Development annual report. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office (annual).
11.
Department of Justice annual report, Civil Rights Division. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office (annual).
12.
Economic Indicators (1986). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
13.
Edwards, G. C.
(1979). Problems in presidential policy implementation. In S. A. Shull & L. T. LeLoup (Eds.), The presidency: Studies in policy making (pp. 271-295). Brunswick, OH: King's Court.
Flaxbeard, J. M.
(1983). Presidential policy making: The use of executive orders and presidential support on civil rights issues. Paper presented at Southern Political Science Association, Birmingham, November.
16.
Garand, J. C.
, & Gross, D. A., (1982). Toward a theory of bureaucratic compliance with presidential directives. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 12 (Spring), 195-208.
17.
Halperin, M.
(1971). Why bureaucrats play games. Foreign Policy, 2 (May), 70-90.
18.
Halpern, S. C.
(1985). Title VI enforcement, In T. Yarbrough (Ed.) The Reagan administration and human rights. New York. Praeger.
19.
Handbook of labor statistics. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office (serial).
20.
Hargrove, E. C.
(1974). Power of the modern presidency. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
21.
Lamb, C. M.
(1984). Equal housing opportunity. In C. F. Bullock III and C. M. Lamb (Eds.) Implementation of civil rights policy (pp. 148-183). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
22.
LeLoup, L. T.
(1979). Fiscal chief: Presidents and their budgets. In S. A. Shull & L. T. LeLoup (Eds.), The presidency: Studies in policy making. Brunswick, OH: King's Court, 195-219.
23.
McConnell, G.
(1976). The modern presidency (2nd ed.). New York: St. Martin's.
24.
Miller, J.
(1984). Ronald Reagan and the techniques of deception. Atlantic Monthly, (February), 62-68.
25.
Moe, T. M.
(1982). Regulatory performance and presidential administration. American Journal of Political Science, 26 (May), 197-244.
26.
Morgan, R. P.
(1970). The President and civil rights. New York: St. Martin's.
27.
Mowery, D.C.
, & Kamlet, M. S. (1984). Budgeting side payments and government growth. American Journal of Political Science, 27 (November), 636-664.
28.
Nathan, R. P.
(1983). The administration presidency. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
29.
Neely, A.
(1984). Government role in rooting out, remedying discrimination is shifting. National Journal, Sep. 22, 1984, 1772-1775.
30.
Neustadt, R. E.
(1980). Presidential power (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
31.
Orfield, G.
(1975). Congressional power: Congress and social change. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
32.
Panetta, L. E.
, & Gall, P. (1971). Bring us together: The Nixon team and the civil rights retreat. Philadelphia: Lippincott.
Randall, R.
(1979). Presidential power versus bureaucratic intransigence: The influence of the Nixon administration on welfare policy. American Political Science Review, 73 (September), 795-810.
35.
Rodgers, H. R., Jr.
, & Bullock, C. S. III. (1972). Law and social change: Civil rights laws and their consequences. New York: McGraw Hill.
36.
St. George, D.
(1983). Administration may have to shelve its relaxed minority hiring rules. National Journal, Nov. 22, 1983, 2170-2173.
37.
Scholz, J. T.
, & Wei, F. H. (1986). Regulatory enforcement in a federal system. American Political Science Review, 80 (December), 1249-1970.
38.
Shull, S. A.
(1983). Domestic policy formualtion: Presidential-Congressional partnership?Westport, CT: Greenwood.
39.
Shull, S. A.
(1977). Interrelated concepts in policy research. Sage Professional Papers in American Politics, 36. Beverly Hills: Sage.
40.
Special Analyses on Civil Rights, Budget of the U.S. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1984, 1985, 1986.
41.
Wayne, S. J.
(1978). The legislative presidency. New York: Harper & Row.
42.
Weingast, B. R.
, & Moran, M. J. (1983). Bureaucratic discretion or congressional control. Journal of Political Economy, 91, 765-800.
43.
Wildavsky, A. B.
(1984). Politics of the budgetary process (4th ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.
44.
Wines, M.
(1982). Administration says it merely seeks a "better way" to enforce civil rights. National Journal, Mar. 27, 1982, 536-541.
45.
Yarbrough, T.
(Ed.). (1985). The Reagan administration and human rights. New York: Praeger.
