Three successive terms of market-oriented presidents raise difficulties for federal bureaucrats in legitimating past administrative doctrine and practices, which were government-centered. The present article responds to Charles Levine's call for a new administrative doctrine that is more fully descriptive of the needs and routines of today's federal civil servants than a doctrine based on either a liberal or neo-conservative ideology. The author introduces the concept of doctrine into public administration discourse in order to clarify the differences in ideology, doctrine, and practices between an era of top-down liberal progressivism and the era of bottom-up neo-conservative progressivism that dawned with the first Reagan administration. The purpose is to take a first step in describing emerging administrative realities that both traditional bureaucrats and free-marketeers must recognize.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Altshuler, A.
(1970). Community control. New York: Pegasus.
2.
Apple, R. W.
(1989, May 25). The capital: How long can Bush continue to speak in timid cliches while the world of totalitarianism shakes?The New York Times (national ed.). p. 16.
3.
Barnet, R. J.
, & Mueller, R. E. (1974). Global reach: The power of the multinational corporations. New York: Simon & Schuster.
4.
Burnham, W. D.
(1989). The Reagan legacy. In Gerald M. Pomper (Ed.) The election of 1988: Reports and interpretations (pp. 1-32). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
5.
Calista, D.
(Ed.). (1986). Bureaucratic and governmental reform. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
6.
Carroll, J. D.
, Fritschler, A. L., & Smith, B.L.R. (1985). Supply-side management in the Reagan administration. Public Administration Review, 45 (6), 805-813.
7.
Committee for Economic Development, Research and Development Committee
(1980). Stimulating technological progress. Qtd. in J. Diebold, Making the future work (p. 325). New York: Simon & Schuster.
8.
Court opinions in voiding Richmond contracting plan
. The New York Times, January 24, 1989, p. 12.
9.
Diebold, J.
(1984). Making the future work. New York: Simon & Schuster.
10.
Dionne, E. J., Jr.
(1988, December 2). Reagan debt legacy: His trap for democrats?The New York Times (national ed.). p. 11.
11.
Green, T. H.
1878-90 (1927). Lectures on the principles of political obligation. London: Longmans, Green & Co., Ltd.
12.
Hummel, R. P.
(1987). The bureaucratic experience. (3rd ed.). New York: St. Martin's.
13.
Ingraham, P.
, & Ban, C. (1986). Models of public management: Are they useful to federal managers in the 1980s?Public Administration Review, 46 (2), 152-160.
14.
Jun, J. S.
(1986). Public administration: Design and problem-solving. New York: Macmillan.
15.
Kash, D. E.
, & Ballard, S. (1987). Academic and applied policy studies—A comparison. American Behavioral Scientist, 30 (6), 597-611.
16.
Kilborn, P. T.
(1989, January 11). Reagan advisers blame U.S. policy for savings crisis. The New York Times (national ed.). p. 1, 30.
17.
Kotler, M.
(1969). Neighborhood government. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
18.
Levine, C. H.
(1986). The federal government in the year 2000: Administrative legacies in the Reagan years. Public Administation Review, 46 (3), 195-206.
19.
Moe, T. M.
(1985). The politicized presidency. In J. Chubb and P. Peterson, (Eds.), The new direction in American politics (pp. 235-271). Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
20.
Peters, G. B.
(1989). The politics of bureaucracy: A comparative perspective (3rd ed.). New York: Longman.
21.
Peters, T. J.
, & Waterman, R. H. (1984). In search of excellence. New York: Warner Books.
22.
Roelofs, H. M.
(1976). Ideology and myth in American politics: A critique of a national political mind. Boston: Little, Brown.
23.
Sanera, M.
(1984). Implementing the mandate. In S. M. Butler, M. Sanera, & W. B. Weinrod, (Eds.) Mandate forleadership II: Continuing the conservative revolution (pp. 514-515). Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation.
24.
Seidman, H.
, & Gilmour, R. (1986). Politics, position and power: From the positive to the regulatory state (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
Selznick, P.
(1957). Leadership in administration. New York: Harper & Row.
26.
Shain, B. Personal communication, spring, 1989.
27.
Stockman, D.
(1987). The triumph of politics: The inside story of the Reagan revolution. New York: Avon Books.
28.
U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff
(1968). Dictionary of United States terms for joint usage (JCS Publication 6). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
29.
Waldo, D.
(1984). The administrative state (2nd ed.). New York: Homes & Meier.
30.
Wamsley, G. L.
, Goodsell, C. J., Rohr, J. A., White, O. F., & Wolf, J. F. (1984). The public administration and the governing process: Reforming the American dialogue [Blacksburg Manifesto]. Dialogue—The Public Administration Theory Network, 6 (2), 1-17.
31.
Weber, M.
(1958). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism (T. Parsons, Trans.). New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
32.
Weber, M.
(1968). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology, G. Roth & C. Wittich (Eds.), E. Fischoff et al. (trans.). New York: Bedminster Press.
33.
White, O.
, & McSwain, C. (1988, April). The Phoenix Project: Raising a new image of public administration from the ashes of the past. Paper presented at the First National Symposium in Public Administration Theory held in conjunction with the annual meeting of the American Society for Public Administration, Lewis & Clark College, Portland, OR.
