Published admissions standards typically include factors such as test scores, grades, and letters of recommendation. Yet there is little direct evidence in the literature on how these criteria as well as race and sex are actually utilized in student selection. That is, what are the operative rules in admissions decisions? This study reports the results of a survey of the National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration principal representatives. Each respondent was presented an applicant profile booklet designed to estimate the impact of grades, GRE scores, references, race, and gender on admission decisions. In the findings we discuss how these variables are considered in the selection process. The analysis concludes with a commentary on the implications of the data for Master of Public Administration programs, and their admissions practices.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Assembly of Collegiate Schools of Business
(1987). Outcome Measurement Project: Phase 111 Report. St. Louis: Author.
2.
Baird, L. L.
(1987). Do students think admissions tests are fair? Do tests affect their decisions?Research in Higher Education, 26(4), 373-388.
3.
Baxter, J. C.
, Brock, B., Hill, R. C., & Rozelle, R. M. (1981). Letters of recommendation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66 (June), 296-301.
4.
Bloom, A.
(1987). Closing of the American MindNew York: Simon and Schuster.
5.
Bowman, J. S.
(1988). Admission practices in MPA Programs: A nationwide survey. Public Administration Review, 48, 5 (September/October), 867-875.
6.
Clark, M. J.
(1984). Older and Younger Graduate Students: A Comparison of Goals, Grades, and GRE Scores (Research Report 84-5). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
7.
Dawes, R. M.
(1971). A case study of graduate admissions: Application of three principles of human decision making, American Psychologist, 26,(2) (February), 180-188.
8.
Dunlap, W. R.
(1979). How effective are graduate social work admission criteria?Journal of Education for Social Work, 15 (Fall), 96-102.
9.
Fuller, B.
(1978). Alternative admissions procedures, New Directions for Higher Education6 (3) 1-27.
10.
Guyot, J. F.
& Wiedemann, C. F. (1982, May 1). New polish for an old shoe: The Graduate Record Examination and MPA admission decisions. Public Administration Times, p. 5.
11.
Harnett, R. T.
& Willingham, W. W. (1979). The Criterion Problem: What Measure of Success in Graduate Education? (Research Report No. 77-4R). Princeton, NJ: GRE Board.
12.
Hartle, T.
, et a/. (1983). Older Students and the GRE Aptitude Test (Research Report 83-20). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
13.
Heslip, R. D.
(1980). Admitting disadvantaged students to academic research programs: ETS's non-traditional academic admissions criteria, Educational Theory, 30 (Summer), 193-202.
14.
Jennings, E. T., Jr.
(1988, March). Do we need a major curriculum study? The work of the NASPAA Curriculum Committee, Paper presented at the National Conference on Teaching Public Administration, Georgia State University, Atlanta.
15.
Kaiser, J.
(1982, November). Predictive validity of the Graduate Record Examination Aptitude Test, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Rocky Mountain Research Association, Albuquerque, NM.
16.
Klitgaard, R.
(1985). Choosing Elites. New York: Basic Books.
17.
Lee, D. S.
& Cayer, N. J. (1987). Recruitment of minority students for public administration education, Public Administration Review, 47 (July/August), 329-335.
18.
Leonardson, G. R.
(1979). The contribution of academic factors in predicting graduate school success, College Student Journal13 (Spring), 21-24.
19.
Lerner, B.
(1979). Tests and standards today: Attacks, counterattacks and responses, New Directions for Testing and Measurement, 3, 15-31.
20.
Linn, R. L.
(1982). Admissions testing on trial, American Psychologist, 37 (March), 279-291.
21.
Manning, W. H.
(1978). Beyond Bakke: Unfinished agenda in admissions. Current Issues in Higher Education Annual Monograph, 2.
22.
Millimet, C. T.
and Flume, M. E. (1982). Estimating graduate admission standards in psychology, Research in Higher Education17(2), 125-137.
23.
Milner, M.
, McNeil, J. & King, S. (1984). The GRE: A question of validity in predicting performance in professional schools of social work, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44 (Winter), 945-950.
24.
Mitchell, J. V.
(1985). Mental Measurements Yearbook9th ed.Lincoln, NE: Burros Institute of Mental Measurements, 448.
25.
National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration
(1987). Task Force Report on the Future of NASPAA. Washington, DC: Author.
26.
National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration
. (1986). Standards for Professional Master's Degree Programs in Public Affairs and AdministrationWashington, DC: Author.
27.
Schmidt, F. L.
, Johnson, R. H. & Gugel, J. F. (1978). Utility of policy capturing as an approach to graduate admissions decision making, Applied Psychological Measurement, 2, 3 (Summer), 345-357.
28.
Thompson, L.
& Kobrak, P. (1983). Predicting the success of students in an MPA program, Teaching Political Science, 10 (Summer), 182-188.
29.
Walden, T.
(1981). Appeals of graduate admissions decisions, Journal of Education for Social Work, 17 (Winter), 96-101.
30.
Wallach, M. A.
(1976). Tests tell us little about talent, American Scientist, 64 (January-February), 57-63.
31.
Wigdor, A. K.
& Garner, W. R. (1982). Ability testing in modern society In A. K. Wigdor & W. R. Garner (Eds.), Ability Testing: Uses, Consequences, and Controversies (pp 7-24) Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
32.
Willingham, W. W.
(1976). Validity and the Graduate Record Examinations Program, Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
33.
Wilson, K.
(1984). Foreign Nations Taking the GRE General Test During 1981-82: Highlights of a Study (Research Report 84-23) Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
