Abstract
Between 1976 and 1986, women's gross turnover rates were about one-third higher than men's in the federal civil service. Such differences frequently are cited as a justification for preferring men for positions with high training costs or as one explanation why men earn so much more than women. Using a 1% sample of federal personnel records for 1976-86, this paper shows how misleading gross turnover rates can be. Male-female differences seem to be almost entirely due to differences in average age, salary, and length of service. Men and women in similar circumstances have very similar turnover probabilities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
